본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

product-demand-research

Test product-demand hypotheses using public customer language, search and social signals, competitor offers, reviews, comments, creator content, and social-commerce evidence before committing to a product, launch, offer, or campaign.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • skill.meta.json398 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Product Demand Research

Assess whether a product problem, promise, audience, or concept has meaningful evidence behind it.

Inputs

  • Product idea or current product, target market, geography, price/offer assumptions, competitors, and the decision at stake.
  • Hypotheses to test: problem frequency, urgency, current alternatives, willingness signals, objections, or message fit.

Workflow

  1. Write the hypotheses and what evidence would support or weaken each one.
  2. Collect customer language from reviews, forums, search results, social posts, video transcripts, and comments. Use scrapecreators-api, comment-mining, and transcript-intelligence where appropriate.
  3. When the category is sold through social commerce, add a social-commerce evidence pass: TikTok Shop search and category results, product details, reviews, creator showcases, and relevant Amazon Shop pages. Record prices, offers, ratings, review themes, creator-product adjacency, and visible assortment changes.
  4. Map alternatives: direct competitors, substitutes, workarounds, and doing nothing. Record offers, pricing, proof, repeated complaints, and audience response.
  5. Separate attention signals from buying signals. Views and likes show interest; questions about price, availability, comparison, results, repeat use, and credible purchase or review evidence are closer to demand. Shop presence and creator showcases are not proof of sales.
  6. Score each hypothesis by evidence strength, consistency across sources, recency, source diversity, and distance from an observable purchase decision.
  7. Recommend the cheapest next validation: interview, landing-page test, waitlist, offer test, creator test, merchandising test, or ad-message test.

Output

  • Decision summary: proceed, refine, test further, or weak evidence.
  • Hypothesis evidence table with supporting and contradicting sources.
  • Customer language, use cases, triggers, alternatives, objections, willingness signals, and social-commerce evidence when relevant.
  • Market/competitor observations without unsupported market-size claims.
  • Recommended validation plan and success thresholds.

This is directional research, not proof of product-market fit or a substitute for first-party sales data.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3천2026년 10월 24일 업데이트

gooseworks-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고