Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Source | Marginal ROI optimization + portfolio theory for marketing |
| Core Principle | Allocate each dollar where the marginal return is highest — shift spend from diminishing-returns channels to underspent ones |
| Framework | 70/20/10 — 70% proven channels, 20% optimization tests, 10% new channel experiments |
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Calculates ROAS, CAC, and CPL per channel and campaign | Total budget constraints |
| Identifies diminishing returns and reallocation opportunities | Risk tolerance for new channels |
| Models projected outcomes for different allocation scenarios | Business priorities and brand considerations |
| Creates monitoring dashboards and alert thresholds | Platform selection and creative direction |
Collect these metrics per channel and campaign:
| Metric | Formula | Healthy Range |
|---|---|---|
| ROAS | Revenue ÷ Ad Spend | >3:1 for most B2B/B2C |
| CAC | Ad Spend ÷ New Customers | <LTV ÷ 3 |
| CPL | Ad Spend ÷ Leads | Varies by industry |
| CTR | Clicks ÷ Impressions | >1% search, >0.5% social |
| Conv Rate | Conversions ÷ Clicks | >2% landing pages |
Validation checkpoint: If data is missing for any channel, flag it — incomplete data leads to wrong reallocations.
Choose the model that matches the business:
| Model | Best For | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Last Click | Direct response, short cycles | Ignores awareness |
| First Click | Awareness campaigns | Ignores conversion assist |
| Linear | Balanced multi-touch view | Dilutes signal |
| Time Decay | Shorter sales cycles | Biases toward bottom-funnel |
| Position-Based | Balanced with emphasis | May miss mid-funnel |
| Data-Driven | Sophisticated, enough data | Requires volume |
For each channel, answer: Where does the next $1 produce the most return?
| Signal | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| CAC well below target | Headroom to scale | Increase spend 50%, monitor weekly |
| CAC at target | Optimized | Maintain, test creative |
| CAC above target | Diminishing returns | Reduce spend, reallocate |
| Low volume, good CAC | Underinvested | Scale cautiously (2x) |
| High volume, rising CAC | Hitting ceiling | Cap spend, diversify |
Build 3 scenarios (conservative, moderate, aggressive) showing projected leads, CAC, and ROAS at each budget level. Include:
Weekly monitoring checklist:
Scaling rule: If CAC stays 15%+ below target for 2 consecutive weeks, increase spend by 25%. If CAC exceeds target for 2 weeks, reduce by 25%.
Input: $100K/month — Google ($50K), Meta ($30K), LinkedIn ($15K), Other ($5K). Target: $200 CAC, 500 leads/month. Current: 395 leads, $253 CAC.
Diagnosis:
Proposed reallocation:
| Channel | Current | Proposed | Expected CAC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | $50K | $35K | $206 |
| Meta | $30K | $50K | $196 |
| $15K | $8K | $286 | |
| Testing | $5K | $7K | Variable |
Projected result: 473 leads (+20%), $211 CAC (-17%).
google-ads-expert — Google-specific campaign optimizationaarrr-metrics — Full funnel view beyond paid acquisitiongrowth-loops — Sustainable growth beyond paid channels아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Créez des storyboards visuellement cohérents en utilisant la technique des 2x2 Grid Shots de PJ Ace, garantissant éclairage, personnages et décors uniformes entre les plans. Use when: **Après avoir finalisé un script vidéo** - Transformer le concept en visuels; **Besoin de cohérence visuelle** - Personnages et éclairage constants entre les plans; **Préparer des assets pour animation** - Frames prêtes pour Veo, Runway, Kling; **Présenter un storyboard client** - Visualisation avant production;...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.