Structured peer-review of academic papers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Consulting-grade research reports: framework + final report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Produces professional, consulting-grade research reports in Markdown, covering market analysis, consumer insights, brand strategy, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, and investment due diligence.
Operates in two phases:
Output adheres to McKinsey/BCG consulting voice standards.
All data in the report MUST derive from provided Data Summary or External Search Findings. No hallucinations. If data is missing, state "Data not available" rather than fabricating numbers. Every major claim must be traceable to input data.
| Domain | Typical Dimensions |
|---|---|
| Market Analysis | Market size, growth, segmentation, drivers, competition |
| Brand Analysis | Positioning, share, perception, strategy |
| Consumer Insights | Demographics, behavior, decision journey, pain points |
| Financial Analysis | Macro, industry, fundamentals, metrics, valuation |
| Industry Research | Value chain, market size, competition, policy, tech |
| Investment DD | Business model, financials, management, opportunity, risk |
| Competitive Intel | Competitor ID, comparison, SWOT, positioning |
Select 2-4 complementary frameworks per domain:
| Category | Frameworks |
|---|---|
| Strategic | SWOT, PESTEL, Porter's Five Forces, VRIO |
| Market & Growth | STP, BCG Matrix, Ansoff, TAM-SAM-SOM, PLC |
| Consumer | Decision Journey, AARRR, RFM, JTBD |
| Financial | DuPont, DCF, Comparable Company, EVA |
| Competitive | Benchmarking, Value Chain, Blue Ocean, Perceptual Mapping |
| Industry | Gartner Hype Cycle, GE-McKinsey Matrix |
Selection principles: domain-first, complementary not overlapping, depth over breadth, data-feasible, explicitly mapped to chapters.
Each chapter must include:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Data Metric | Specific metric needed |
| Data Type | Quantitative / Qualitative / Mixed |
| Suggested Sources | Industry reports, gov stats, social media, etc. |
| Search Keywords | Queries for data collection |
| Priority | P0 (Required) / P1 (Important) / P2 (Supplementary) |
| Time Range | Period data should cover |
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Chart Type | Line, bar, pie, scatter, radar, heatmap, table |
| Chart Title | Descriptive title |
| Data Mapping | Which metrics map to axes/segments |
| Argument Structure | "What → Why → So What" narrative outline |
# [Research Subject] Analysis Framework
## Research Overview
- **Research Subject**: [...]
- **Scope**: [Geography, time range, segment]
- **Analysis Domain**: [Market / Finance / Industry / ...]
- **Core Research Questions**: [1-3 key questions]
## Framework Selection
| Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application |
|---------|----------------------|-------------|
## Chapter Skeleton
### 1. [Chapter Title]
- **Analysis Objective**: [...]
- **Analysis Logic**: [...]
- **Core Hypothesis**: [...]
#### Data Requirements
| # | Metric | Type | Sources | Keywords | Priority | Time |
#### Visualization & Content Plan
[Chart plan + table design + argument structure]
## Data Collection Task List
[Consolidated P0/P1 tasks for downstream data collection]
After data collection (by deep-research or other skills), synthesize into
final report.
Confirm Analysis Framework + Data Summary present. Flag missing P0 data.
For each sub-chapter, follow "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis":
Each insight must connect Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication:
❌ Bad: "Females are 60%. Strategy: Target females."
✅ Good: "Females constitute 60% with high TGI. This suggests purchase is
driven by aesthetic validation. Consequently, media spend should pivot
to visual-heavy platforms."
# [Report Title]
## Abstract
[Executive summary with key takeaways]
## 1. Introduction
[Background, objectives, methodology]
## 2. [Body Chapter]
### 2.1 [Sub-chapter]
| Metric | Brand A | Brand B |
[Integrated narrative: What → Why → So What, min 200 words]
## N+1. Conclusion
[Pure objective synthesis, NO bullet points, neutral tone]
## N+2. References
[Formatted references]
1,000 not 1,000)1., 1.1), no "Chapter/Part/Section"
prefixes---).poirot/outputs/아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Structured peer-review of academic papers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Dark-themed SVG architecture/cloud/infra diagrams as HTML.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search arXiv papers by keyword, author, category, or ID.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Monitor blogs and RSS/Atom feeds via blogwatcher-cli.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Onboarding conversation to generate a user profile.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate charts: select type, extract data, render image.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.