본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

codexkit-business-case-writer

Write structured business cases with problem framing, options analysis, financial modeling (NPV/ROI/Payback), risk assessment, and implementation roadmap. Follows HBR business case structure. Use when seeking budget approval, proposing new initiatives, or justifying investment decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml179 B
  • examples/common-mistakes.md791 B
  • examples/good-output.md870 B
  • verification/checklist.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Business Case Writer

When to Use

  • When proposing a new project or initiative that needs funding
  • When leadership requires financial justification for an investment
  • When comparing build vs buy vs partner options
  • When preparing for a governance or investment board review

Procedure

Step 1 — Executive Summary

Write a 1-paragraph summary that covers:

  • The problem / opportunity (1 sentence)
  • The recommended solution (1 sentence)
  • The expected value (1 sentence with key numbers)
  • The ask (1 sentence — what you need approval for)

Step 2 — Problem Statement

Frame the problem with data:

  • What is happening today? (current state with metrics)
  • What is the impact? (revenue, cost, risk, customer satisfaction)
  • Why now? (trigger event, competitive pressure, window of opportunity)
  • What happens if we do nothing? (cost of inaction)

Step 3 — Options Analysis

CriterionOption A: BuildOption B: BuyOption C: Do Nothing
Time to value6 months2 months—
Upfront cost$200K$80K$0
Annual cost$50K$120K/yr$300K (cost of problem)
ControlFullLimited—
RiskMedium (execution)Low (vendor)High (growing problem)
Strategic fitHighMediumLow

Step 4 — Financial Analysis

MetricYear 1Year 2Year 3Total
Revenue impact$100K$250K$400K$750K
Cost savings$50K$80K$80K$210K
Total benefit$150K$330K$480K$960K
Investment($200K)($50K)($50K)($300K)
Net value($50K)$280K$430K$660K

Summary metrics:

  • ROI: 220% over 3 years
  • Payback period: 14 months
  • NPV (8% discount): $540K

Step 5 — Risk Assessment

RiskProbabilityImpactMitigation
Execution delayMediumMediumPhased rollout, dedicated team
Adoption failureLowHighChange management plan
Technology riskLowMediumPOC before full commit

Step 6 — Implementation Roadmap

PhaseDurationDeliverablesInvestment
Phase 1: Discovery4 weeksRequirements, vendor shortlist$20K
Phase 2: Build/Buy12 weeksWorking solution$150K
Phase 3: Rollout4 weeksTraining, go-live$30K

Step 7 — The Ask

Clearly state:

  • What approval is needed (budget, headcount, executive sponsor)
  • What the decision deadline is
  • What happens if delayed

Inputs

InputRequiredFormat
Problem descriptionYesCurrent situation and impact
Proposed solutionYesWhat you want to do
Financial dataYesCosts, expected benefits
AlternativesRecommendedOther options considered
TimelineRecommendedWhen you need a decision

Output

## Business Case — [Initiative Name]

### Executive Summary
Our customer support team handles 5,000 tickets/month manually, costing
$400K/year in labor. Implementing an AI-powered triage system will reduce
manual handling by 40%, saving $160K/year with a 10-month payback.
We request $120K in funding for Q2 implementation.

### Problem Statement
[Data-driven problem framing]

### Options
[Comparison matrix]

### Financial Analysis
[3-year projection with ROI, payback, NPV]

### Risk Assessment
[Risk table with mitigations]

### Implementation Roadmap
[Phased plan with milestones]

### Decision Requested
Approve $120K Q2 budget + 2 FTE allocation by March 30.

Definition of Done

  • Executive summary fits in one paragraph
  • Problem quantified with cost of inaction
  • At least 3 options compared (including do nothing)
  • Financial analysis includes ROI, payback, NPV
  • Risks identified with mitigations
  • Clear ask with decision deadline

Quality Criteria

  • All claims reference specific frameworks, standards, or quantifiable data
  • Content matches the stated audience's expertise level
  • Recommendations are actionable — each includes a concrete next step
  • No unsupported assertions or generic filler language

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessDo referenced frameworks and standards match their official definitions?
CompletenessAre all key concepts covered without significant gaps for the stated audience?
Context-fitWould this be useful for someone new to this domain, or is it too advanced/too basic?
ConsequenceIf a stakeholder acted on this immediately, what could they misinterpret?

Edge Cases

  • Conflicting frameworks — State which framework takes precedence and why. Document the trade-off explicitly.
  • Rapidly changing domain — Note information currency date. Flag sections likely to need updates.
  • Audience has mixed expertise levels — Provide a glossary and mark advanced sections as optional.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

hoavdc의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고