본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

codexkit-survey-analyzer

Analyze survey and feedback data with statistical distributions, cross-tabulations, significance testing, and open-ended theme extraction. Produces executive-ready survey reports with segment comparisons and action recommendations. Use when processing NPS, CSAT, employee engagement, or market research surveys.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml166 B
  • examples/common-mistakes.md849 B
  • examples/good-output.md837 B
  • verification/checklist.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Survey Analyzer

When to Use

  • After collecting NPS, CSAT, or employee engagement survey responses
  • When analyzing market research or customer feedback data
  • When leadership needs actionable insights from survey results
  • When comparing satisfaction across segments (regions, teams, products)

Procedure

Step 1 — Data Overview

Summarize the survey:

  • Total responses vs invitations sent → response rate
  • Collection period
  • Question types: Likert scale, multiple choice, ranking, open-ended
  • Known biases: self-selection, non-response, recency

Step 2 — Quantitative Analysis

For each closed-ended question:

QuestionNMeanMedianStd DevDistribution Shape
[Q1 text][n][mean][median][sd]Normal / Skewed L / Skewed R / Bimodal

Calculate key indices:

  • NPS: % Promoters (9–10) − % Detractors (0–6)
  • CSAT: % Satisfied (4–5 on 5-point scale)
  • Engagement: Overall index from engagement battery

Step 3 — Segment Comparison

Cross-tabulate by key segments:

SegmentNScorevs OverallSignificant?
Region A12072+4Yes (p<0.05)
Region B9565−3No (p=0.12)

Test significance:

  • Chi-square for categorical × categorical
  • t-test or ANOVA for continuous × categorical
  • Flag small samples (<30) as unreliable

Step 4 — Open-Ended Theme Extraction

For free-text responses:

  1. Code responses into themes (max 8–10 themes)
  2. Count frequency of each theme
  3. Identify sentiment per theme (positive / neutral / negative)
ThemeFrequency% of ResponsesSentimentExample Quote
Onboarding speed4518%Negative"Took 3 weeks to get access"

Step 5 — Insight Synthesis

Structure insights as:

  • What: the finding (data-driven)
  • So What: why it matters (impact)
  • Now What: recommended action

Step 6 — Action Recommendations

PriorityInsightActionOwnerTimeline
1NPS dropped 8 pts in segment XInvestigate root causeCX Lead2 weeks

Inputs

InputRequiredFormat
Survey responsesYesCSV, spreadsheet, or summary tables
Question listYesQuestions with response types
SegmentsRecommendedHow to slice the data
Previous resultsRecommendedFor trend comparison

Output

## Survey Analysis — [Survey Name]

### Overview
- **Period:** Q1 2024 | **Responses:** 532 / 1,200 (44% response rate)
- **NPS:** +32 (↓4 from Q4) | **CSAT:** 78% (stable)

### Key Findings
1. **Onboarding satisfaction dropped 12 points** — driven by Region B
   - Root cause: New system rollout created delays
   - Action: Expedite training for Region B ops team

2. **Support quality is the #1 driver of promoter scores**
   - Correlation: 0.72 between support rating and NPS
   - Action: Protect support team headcount in budget cycle

### Segment Comparison
[Cross-tabulation table]

### Open-Ended Themes
[Theme frequency table with example quotes]

### Recommended Actions
[Prioritized action table with owners]

Definition of Done

  • Response rate calculated and bias noted
  • All quantitative questions summarized with distributions
  • Segment comparisons with significance testing
  • Open-ended themes extracted and quantified
  • What / So What / Now What insights provided
  • Action recommendations prioritized with owners

Quality Criteria

  • Data sources and assumptions are explicitly stated
  • Calculations are reproducible from provided inputs
  • Visualizations or tables have clear labels, units, and time ranges
  • Caveats and confidence levels are documented for estimates

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessAre formulas, aggregations, and statistical methods applied correctly?
CompletenessDoes the analysis cover all requested metrics and time ranges?
Context-fitAre the chosen metrics relevant to the business question being answered?
ConsequenceIf this data were used for a decision today, what blind spots remain?

Edge Cases

  • Missing or incomplete data — Document gaps and their potential impact on conclusions. Provide ranges instead of point estimates.
  • Outliers skewing results — Report with and without outliers. Document the decision to include or exclude.
  • Changing data definitions mid-period — Split analysis at the change boundary and note the schema difference.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

hoavdc/CodexKit252026년 10월 11일 업데이트

hoavdc의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고