AID Phase 4 - Development phase. Use for implementing features, TDD practices, code reviews, transitioning from planning to QA.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-PRD Research methodology combining Business Analysis, Creative Problem-Solving, Brainstorming, and Innovation Strategy. Use before writing any PRD for problem validation, market research, competitive analysis, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Applies before any PRD exists: problem validation, market/competitive research, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis. Does not apply once the PRD is being written.
Core belief: fall in love with the problem, not the solution.
| Pillar | Focus | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| Business Analysis | Evidence & Requirements | What do we know for certain? |
| Creative Problem-Solving | Root Causes & Systems | What's really going on? |
| Brainstorming | Possibilities & Ideas | What could we do? |
| Innovation Strategy | Value & Positioning | Why would anyone care? |
ACTIVITY A: UNDERSTAND (problem analysis, stakeholder map, market research) -> ACTIVITY B: EXPLORE (ideation, root cause hunt) -> ACTIVITY C: DEFINE (strategic synthesis, validation)
ID format: [Project]-[Activity]-[Type]-[Number]
PROJ-A-INT-001 = Interview finding #1PROJ-B-IDEA-003 = Idea #3PROJ-C-OPP-002 = Opportunity #2Traceability matrix columns:
| Research ID | Finding | Source | PRD Requirement | User Story |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROJ-A-INT-001 | Users frustrated by X | Interview | REQ-001 | US-001 |
Details: references/traceability-guide.md
Entry: initial idea/request/problem exists; stakeholders available; time allocated (minimum 2-3 sessions).
Exit (Gate to PRD):
Emit: Stated Problem: [Initial statement]; Why 1..Why 5 each -> [Answer] with Why 5 -> [Root Cause]; Validation Method: [How to verify].
Rate each dimension 1-10: Frequency, Impact, Reach, Urgency, Strategic. Score = (Frequency x Impact x Reach) + (Urgency x 2) + (Strategic x 3)
Questions: references/interview-guide.md
| Interest Low | Interest High | |
|---|---|---|
| Power High | Satisfy | Manage Closely |
| Power Low | Monitor | Keep Informed |
Table columns: Competitor, Target, Features, Pricing, Strengths, Weaknesses.
Key questions: Gap in market? Overserved needs? Underserved needs? Emerging trends?
Method: references/competitive-analysis.md
When [situation] I want to [progress] So I can [outcome]. Also capture emotional job, social job.
Facilitation: references/brainstorming-techniques.md
Emit per idea: Idea: [Title]; ID: [PROJECT]-B-IDEA-[XXX]; One-Liner: [Explain in one sentence]; User Value: [Why would someone want this?]; Wild Rating: 1-5.
Systems Map: system boundaries; feedback loops (reinforcing/balancing); leverage points (small changes, big effects); unintended consequences.
Theory of Constraints:
Emit per cluster: Cluster: [Theme Name]; Insights: [List]; Pattern: [Common thread]; Opportunity: [What to do].
Frameworks in depth: references/strategic-frameworks.md
Four Actions Framework — per factor, decide: ELIMINATE, REDUCE, RAISE, CREATE.
Customer Profile: Jobs (Functional, Emotional, Social); Pains — [Pain]: Severity (1-10); Gains — [Gain]: Importance (1-10). Value Map: Products & Services; Pain Relievers; Gain Creators.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| User Value | 30% |
| Feasibility | 25% |
| Strategic Fit | 20% |
| Time to Value | 15% |
| Risk Level | 10% |
Score each option (Option A, Option B, ...) per criterion.
Table columns: Assumption, Impact, Certainty, Validation Method. Example row: [Critical] | High | Low | [How to test].
| Mode | Trigger | Tools | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Analyst | Need evidence | Interviews, 5 Whys, JTBD | Problem statement, stakeholder map |
| Brainstorming | Need ideas | SCAMPER, Crazy 8s, Six Hats | Idea backlog, opportunities |
| Problem-Solver | Need root causes | Systems Map, TOC, TRIZ | Root cause analysis |
| Innovation Strategist | Need positioning | Blue Ocean, Value Prop | Strategic positioning |
| Pitfall | Fix |
|---|---|
| Solution Bias | Write assumptions, try to disprove |
| Confirmation Seeking | Assign devil's advocate |
| Sampling Bias | Cover stakeholder matrix |
| Analysis Paralysis | Time-box, define "good enough" |
| Idea Attachment | Generate 10+ alternatives first |
docs/research/YYYY-MM-DD-[project]/
research-report.md
traceability-matrix.md
interviews/
analysis/
ideation/
opportunities/
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
AID Phase 4 - Development phase. Use for implementing features, TDD practices, code reviews, transitioning from planning to QA.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AID Phase 0 - Research & discovery. Use for validating problem spaces, identifying stakeholders, defining success metrics, deciding whether to proceed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AID Phase 3 - Implementation Planning with consolidation-first approach. Resolves contradictions between PRD and Tech Spec, creates consolidated master document, then breaks down into actionable tasks and populates Jira. Includes sprint planning and risk assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AID Phase 1 - PRD creation. Use for user stories, acceptance criteria, scoping features, transitioning from discovery to tech spec.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AID Phase 5 - QA and Release. Use for validating implementations, acceptance tests, preparing releases, deployment, operational readiness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AID Phase 2 - Technical Specification. Use for system architecture, API contracts, data models, security architecture, transitioning from PRD to implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.