본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

openspec-bulk-archive-change

Archive multiple completed changes at once. Use when archiving several parallel changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.

This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.

Input: None required (prompts for selection)

Steps

  1. Get active changes

    Run openspec list --json to get all active changes.

    If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.

  2. Prompt for change selection

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes:

    • Show each change with its schema
    • Include an option for "All changes"
    • Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.

  3. Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes

    For each selected change, collect:

    a. Artifact status - Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    • Parse schemaName and artifacts list
    • Note which artifacts are done vs other states

    b. Task completion - Read openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md

    • Count - [ ] (incomplete) vs - [x] (complete)
    • If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"

    c. Delta specs - Check openspec/changes/<name>/specs/ directory

    • List which capability specs exist
    • For each, extract requirement names (lines matching ### Requirement: <name>)
  4. Detect spec conflicts

    Build a map of capability -> [changes that touch it]:

    auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
    api  -> [change-c]            <- OK (only 1 change)
    

    A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.

  5. Resolve conflicts agentically

    For each conflict, investigate the codebase:

    a. Read the delta specs from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify

    b. Search the codebase for implementation evidence:

    • Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
    • Check for related files, functions, or tests

    c. Determine resolution:

    • If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
    • If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
    • If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user

    d. Record resolution for each conflict:

    • Which change's specs to apply
    • In what order (if both)
    • Rationale (what was found in codebase)
  6. Show consolidated status table

    Display a table summarizing all changes:

    | Change               | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
    |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
    | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | auth (!)  | Ready* |
    | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
    

    For conflicts, show the resolution:

    * Conflict resolution:
      - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
    

    For incomplete changes, show warnings:

    Warnings:
    - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
    
  7. Confirm batch operation

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation:

    • "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
    • Options might include:
      • "Archive all N changes"
      • "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
      • "Cancel"

    If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.

  8. Execute archive for each confirmed change

    Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):

    a. Sync specs if delta specs exist:

    • Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
    • For conflicts, apply in resolved order
    • Track if sync was done

    b. Perform the archive:

    mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive
    mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
    

    c. Track outcome for each change:

    • Success: archived successfully
    • Failed: error during archive (record error)
    • Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
  9. Display summary

    Show final results:

    ## Bulk Archive Complete
    
    Archived 3 changes:
    - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
    - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
    - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
    
    Skipped 1 change:
    - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
    
    Spec sync summary:
    - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
    - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order)
    

    If any failures:

    Failed 1 change:
    - some-change: Archive directory already exists
    

Conflict Resolution Examples

Example 1: Only one implemented

Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]

Checking add-oauth:
- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow

Checking add-jwt:
- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found

Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.

Example 2: Both implemented

Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]

Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts

Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts

Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).

Output On Success

## Bulk Archive Complete

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/

Spec sync summary:
- N delta specs synced to main specs
- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)

Output On Partial Success

## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/

Skipped M changes:
- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)

Failed K changes:
- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists

Output When No Changes

## No Changes to Archive

No active changes found. Use `/opsx:new` to create a new change.

Guardrails

  • Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
  • Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
  • Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
  • When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
  • Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
  • Show clear per-change status before confirming
  • Use single confirmation for entire batch
  • Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
  • Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
  • Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
  • If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

lint

무료

Run lint checks for VK.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

impactaky/vk82026년 4월 10일 업데이트

impactaky의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고