본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

analyze-test-failures

Use when analyzing failing test cases to determine whether failures indicate genuine bugs or test implementation issues. Activates on "analyze failing tests", "debug test failures", "investigate test errors", or when provided with specific failing test names or output. Applies balanced investigative reasoning — does not auto-fix tests without establishing root cause.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Analyze Test Failures

Analyze failing test cases with a balanced, investigative approach.

Context

When tests fail, there are two primary possibilities:

  1. False positive: The test itself is incorrect
  2. True positive: The test discovered a genuine bug

Analysis Process

1. Initial Analysis

  • Read the failing test carefully, understanding its intent
  • Examine the test's assertions and expected behavior
  • Review the error message and stack trace

2. Investigate the Implementation

  • Check the actual implementation being tested
  • Trace through the code path that leads to the failure
  • Verify that implementation matches documented behavior

3. Apply Critical Thinking

For each failing test, ask:

  • What behavior is the test trying to verify?
  • Is this behavior clearly documented or implied by the API design?
  • Does the current implementation actually provide this behavior?
  • Could this be an edge case the implementation missed?

4. Make a Determination

Classify the failure as one of:

ClassificationMeaning
Test BugTest's expectations are incorrect
Implementation BugCode doesn't behave as it should
AmbiguousIntended behavior is unclear

5. Document Reasoning

Provide clear explanation including:

  • Evidence supporting the conclusion
  • Specific mismatch between expectation and reality
  • Recommended fix (to test or implementation)

Example Analyses

Example 1: Ambiguous Behavior

Scenario: Test expects calculateDiscount(100, 0.2) to return 20, but it returns 80

Analysis:

  • Test assumes function returns discount amount
  • Implementation returns price after discount
  • Function name is ambiguous

Determination: Ambiguous Recommendation: Check documentation or clarify intended behavior

Example 2: Implementation Bug

Scenario: Test expects validateEmail("user@example.com") to return true, but it returns false

Analysis:

  • Test provides a valid email format
  • Implementation regex is missing support for dots in domain
  • Other valid emails also fail

Determination: Implementation Bug Recommendation: Fix the regex to properly validate email addresses per RFC standards

Example 3: Test Bug

Scenario: Test expects divide(10, 0) to return 0, but it throws an error

Analysis:

  • Test assumes division by zero returns 0
  • Implementation throws DivisionByZeroError
  • Standard mathematical behavior is to treat as undefined/error

Determination: Test Bug Recommendation: Update test to expect an error, not 0

Output Format

For each failing test, provide:

Test: [test name/description]
Failure: [what failed and how]

Investigation:
- Test expects: [expected behavior]
- Implementation does: [actual behavior]
- Root cause: [why they differ]

Determination: [Test Bug | Implementation Bug | Ambiguous]

Recommendation:
[Specific fix to either test or implementation]

Key Principles

  • When uncertain, lean toward investigating the implementation
  • Tests are often your specification - they define expected behavior

Related Skills

  • test-failure-mindset: Set investigative approach for session
  • comprehensive-test-review: Full test suite review

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add automated documentation updater to any Claude skill. Creates a Python sync script that downloads upstream docs, processes markdown for AI consumption, and maintains local cache with configurable refresh. Collects template variables, then delegates implementation through 5-phase workflow. Use when adding auto-updating reference documentation to plugins or skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

SAM-style feature initiation workflow — discovery through codebase analysis, architecture spec, task decomposition, validation, and context manifest. Use when a user asks to add a feature, plan a feature, or convert an idea into an executable SAM plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Browser automation for AI agents using the agent-browser CLI and Playwright. Use when navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, logging into sites, or automating any browser task. Triggers on "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "scrape data", "test this web app", "automate browser actions", or any programmatic web interaction request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Create or adapt Claude Code agent definitions. Use when creating an agent, changing subagent configuration, selecting agent scope, or designing a specialized delegation role.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Jamie-BitFlight의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고