본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

suede-sales-enablement

Suede AI sales enablement: builds rep-ready pitch decks (10-12 slide narrative), one-pagers, objection libraries, demo scripts and talk tracks, competitive battle cards kept consistent with public comparison pages, proposal structures, buyer cards, and deal-level ROI calculators that separate sourced claims from modeled value. Returns draft assets with a claim-source table, held for approval. Use when creating or refreshing sales collateral, preparing for a competitive deal, or arming reps for objections and demos. NOT FOR: setting price or terms (use suede-pricing), building the offer (use suede-offers), public comparison pages (use suede-competitors), sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), or publishing unsupported proof.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(8)

  • SKILL.md16.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml577 B
  • CARD.md4.5 KB
  • evals/evals.json6.3 KB
  • references/deck-frameworks.md7.5 KB
  • references/demo-scripts.md11.4 KB
  • references/objection-library.md13.0 KB
  • references/one-pager-templates.md5.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Suede Sales Enablement

Suede AI Sales Enablement turns verified positioning, proof, and deal context into rep-usable decks, one-pagers, objection guides, demos, and playbooks. Every asset separates sourced claims from modeled value and remains a draft until its audience and version are approved.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

  1. Value Proposition & Differentiators

    • What do you sell and who is it for?
    • What makes you different from the next best alternative?
    • What outcomes can you prove?
  2. Sales Motion

    • How do you sell? (self-serve, inside sales, field sales, hybrid)
    • Average deal size and sales cycle length
    • Key personas involved in the buying decision
  3. Collateral Needs

    • What specific assets do you need?
    • What stage of the funnel are they for?
    • Who will use them? (AE, SDR, champion, prospect)
  4. Current State

    • What materials exist today?
    • What's working and what's not?
    • What do reps ask for most?

Core Principles

Sales Uses What Sales Trusts

Involve reps in creation. Use their language, not marketing's. If reps rewrite your deck before sending it, you wrote the wrong deck. Test drafts with your top performers first.

Situation-Specific, Not Generic

Tailor to persona, deal stage, and use case. A deck for a CTO should look different from one for a VP of Sales. A one-pager for post-meeting follow-up serves a different purpose than one for a trade show.

Scannable Over Comprehensive

Reps need information in 3 seconds, not 30. Use bold headers, short bullets, and visual hierarchy. If a rep can't find the answer mid-call, the doc has failed.

Tie Back to Business Outcomes

Every claim connects to revenue, efficiency, or risk reduction. Features mean nothing without the "so what." Replace "AI-powered analytics" with "cut reporting time by 80%."


Sales Deck / Pitch Deck

10-12 Slide Framework

  1. Current World Problem: The pain your buyer lives with today
  2. Cost of the Problem: What inaction costs (time, money, risk)
  3. The Shift Happening: Market or technology change creating urgency
  4. Your Approach: How you solve it differently
  5. Product Walkthrough: 3-4 key workflows, not a feature tour
  6. Proof Points: Metrics, logos, analyst recognition
  7. Case Study: One customer story told well
  8. Implementation / Timeline: How they get from here to live
  9. ROI / Value: Expected return and payback period
  10. Pricing Overview: Transparent, tiered if applicable
  11. Next Steps / CTA: Clear action with timeline

Deck Principles

  • Story arc, not feature tour. Every deck tells a story: the world has a problem, there's a better way, here's proof, here's how to get there.
  • One idea per slide. If you need two points, use two slides.
  • Design for presenting, not reading. Slides support the conversation: they don't replace it. Minimal text, strong visuals.

Customization by Buyer Type

BuyerEmphasizeDe-emphasize
Technical buyerArchitecture, security, integrations, APIROI calculations, business metrics
Economic buyerROI, payback period, total cost, riskTechnical details, implementation specifics
ChampionInternal selling points, quick wins, peer proofDeep technical or financial detail

For full slide-by-slide guidance: See references/deck-frameworks.md


One-Pagers / Leave-Behinds

When to Use

  • Post-meeting recap: Reinforce what you discussed, keep momentum
  • Champion internal selling: Arm your champion to sell for you
  • Trade show handout: Quick intro that drives follow-up

Structure

  1. Problem statement: The pain in one sentence
  2. Your solution: What you do and how
  3. 3 differentiators: Why you vs. alternatives
  4. Proof point: One strong metric or customer quote
  5. CTA: Clear next step with contact info

Design Principles

  • One page, literally. Front only, or front and back maximum.
  • Scannable in 30 seconds. Bold headers, short bullets, whitespace.
  • Include your logo, website, and a specific contact (not info@).
  • Match your brand but keep it clean: this is a sales tool, not a brand piece.

For templates by use case: See references/one-pager-templates.md


Objection Handling Docs

Objection Categories

CategoryExamples
Price"Too expensive," "No budget this quarter," "Competitor is cheaper"
Timing"Not the right time," "Maybe next quarter," "Too busy to implement"
Competition"We already use X," "What makes you different?"
Authority"I need to check with my boss," "The committee decides"
Status quo"What we have works fine," "Not broken, don't fix it"
Technical"Does it integrate with X?," "Security concerns," "Can it scale?"

Response Framework

For each objection, document:

  1. Objection statement: Exactly how reps hear it
  2. Why they say it: The real concern behind the words
  3. Response approach: How to acknowledge and redirect
  4. Proof point: Specific evidence that addresses the concern
  5. Follow-up question: Keep the conversation moving forward

Two Formats

  • Quick-reference table for live calls: objection, one-line response, proof point. Fits on one screen.
  • Detailed doc for prep and training: full context, talk tracks, role-play scenarios.

For the full objection library: See references/objection-library.md


ROI Calculators & Value Props

Calculator Design

Inputs (current state metrics the prospect provides):

  • Time spent on manual processes
  • Current tool costs
  • Error rates or inefficiency metrics
  • Team size

Calculations (your formula for value):

  • Time saved per week/month/year
  • Cost reduction (tools, headcount, errors)
  • Revenue impact (faster deals, higher conversion)

Outputs (what the prospect sees):

  • Annual ROI percentage
  • Payback period in months
  • Total 3-year value

Value Prop by Persona

PersonaCares AboutLead With
CTO / VP EngArchitecture, scale, security, team velocityTechnical superiority, integration depth
VP SalesPipeline, quota attainment, rep productivityRevenue impact, time savings per rep
CFOTotal cost, payback period, riskROI, cost reduction, financial predictability
End userEase of use, daily workflow, learning curveTime saved, frustration eliminated

Implementation Options

Default to slide-based: the ROI story lives in the deck the rep already presents. Escape to a spreadsheet when the prospect supplies and wants to change their own inputs; build a web tool only when deal volume justifies it.


Demo Scripts & Talk Tracks

Script Structure

  1. Opening (2 min): Context setting, agenda, confirm goals for the call
  2. Discovery recap (3 min): Summarize what you learned, confirm priorities
  3. Solution walkthrough (15-20 min): 3-4 key workflows mapped to their pain
  4. Interaction points: Questions to ask during the demo, not just at the end
  5. Close (5 min): Summarize value, propose next steps with timeline

Talk Track Types

TypeDurationFocus
Discovery call30 minQualify, understand pain, map buying process
First demo30-45 minShow 3-4 workflows tied to their pain
Technical deep-dive45-60 minArchitecture, security, integrations, API
Executive overview20-30 minBusiness outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment

Key Principles

  • Demo after discovery, not before. If you don't know their pain, you're guessing which features matter.
  • Customize to their use case. Use their terminology, their data (if possible), their workflow.
  • Leave time for questions. A demo where the prospect doesn't talk is a demo that doesn't close.

For full script templates: See references/demo-scripts.md


Case Study Briefs (Sales Format)

How Sales Case Studies Differ

Marketing case studies tell a story. Sales case studies arm reps with fast-access proof. Keep them short, outcome-focused, and tagged for retrieval.

Structure

  1. Customer profile: Industry, company size, buyer role
  2. Challenge: What they were struggling with (2-3 sentences)
  3. Solution: What they implemented (1-2 sentences)
  4. Results: 3 specific metrics (before/after)
  5. Pull quote: One sentence from the customer
  6. Tags: Industry, use case, company size, persona

Organization

Organize case studies so reps can find the right one instantly:

  • By industry: "Show me a case study for healthcare"
  • By use case: "Show me someone who used us for X"
  • By company size: "Show me an enterprise example"

Proposal Templates

Structure

  1. Executive summary: Their challenge, your solution, expected outcome (1 page max)
  2. Proposed solution: What you'll deliver, mapped to their requirements
  3. Implementation plan: Timeline, milestones, responsibilities
  4. Investment: Pricing, payment terms, what's included
  5. Next steps: How to move forward, decision timeline

Customization Guidance

  • Mirror their language from discovery calls
  • Reference specific pain points they mentioned
  • Include only relevant case studies (same industry or use case)
  • Name the stakeholders you've spoken with

Common Mistakes

  • Too long: If it's over 10 pages, it won't get read. Aim for 5-7.
  • Too generic: Templated proposals signal low effort. Customize the exec summary at minimum.
  • Burying the price: Don't make them hunt for it. Be transparent and confident.

Sales Playbooks

What Goes in a Playbook

  • Buyer profile: Who you're selling to, their goals and pains
  • Qualification criteria: BANT, MEDDIC, or your framework
  • Discovery questions: Organized by topic, not a script
  • Objection handling: Top 10 objections with responses
  • Competitive positioning: How you win against each competitor
  • Demo flow: Recommended sequence for each persona
  • Email templates: Follow-up, proposal, check-in, breakup

When to Build

  • New product launch: Reps need a single source of truth
  • New market segment: Different buyers need different approaches
  • New hire ramp: Playbooks cut ramp time significantly

Keeping It Living

Review quarterly, get input from top reps, remove anything outdated, and assign a named owner.


Competitive Battle Cards

One card per competitor, one page, scannable in a live call.

FieldContent
When you meet themSegments, deal sizes, and triggers where they show up
Their pitchHow they describe themselves, quoted from their current site with date
Where we win3 differentiators, each with a sourced proof point
Where they push backTheir strongest claims against us, and our honest response
LandminesDiscovery questions that surface our strengths
Pricing contextPublic prices with source and date; never guessed
ProofWin stories and logos the user has approved for this use

Keep cards and public comparison pages consistent. Buyers now check claims against "vs" pages, review sites, and AI-assistant answers before the call; a rep claim that contradicts the public page loses credibility. Refresh both when a competitor changes pricing or packaging. Evidence gathering and public pages: suede-competitors and suede-competitor-profiling.


Buyer Persona Cards

Card Structure

FieldDescription
Role / titleCommon titles and reporting structure
GoalsWhat success looks like for them
PainsWhat frustrates them daily
Top objectionsThe 3-5 objections you'll hear from this role
Evaluation criteriaHow they judge solutions
Buying processTheir role in the decision, who they influence
Messaging angleThe one sentence that resonates most

Persona Types

  • Economic buyer: Signs the check. Cares about ROI and risk.
  • Technical buyer: Evaluates the product. Cares about capabilities and integration.
  • End user: Uses it daily. Cares about ease and workflow fit.
  • Champion: Advocates internally. Needs ammunition to sell for you.
  • Blocker: Opposes the purchase. Understand their concern to neutralize it.

Output Format

Deliver the right format for each asset type:

AssetDeliverable
Sales deckSlide-by-slide outline with headline, body copy, and speaker notes
One-pagerFull copy with layout guidance (visual hierarchy, sections)
Objection docTable format: objection, response, proof point, follow-up
Demo scriptScene-by-scene with timing, talk track, and interaction points
ROI calculatorInput fields, formulas, output display with sample data
PlaybookStructured document with table of contents and sections
Persona cardOne-page card format per persona
Battle cardOne page per competitor in the field table above
ProposalSection-by-section copy with customization notes

Close every delivery with a claim-source table: each number, customer name, and capability claim in the asset, its source and date or its modeled assumptions, and whether the user has approved it for external use.

Every proof point and every ROI figure in a delivered asset carries an inline tag: [source: named customer / study / internal report + date] or [modeled, assumptions: the inputs used]. An untagged number is a delivery blocker: tag it or cut it before the asset goes out. The sales deck deliverable uses this unit, repeated for each of the 11 slides above:

### Slide N: [slide name]
**Headline:** [the single idea, written as a sentence]
**Body copy:** [on-slide text, minimal]
**Speaker notes:** [what the rep says out loud, not a re-read of the slide]
**Visual:** [chart / screenshot / logo wall / none]
**Proof:** [source: …] or [modeled, assumptions: …] for every number above

Tool Integrations

Partner-relationship and digital-sales-room platforms can support engagement tracking, deal registration, and mutual action plans. Treat any named vendor as an evaluation lead, not a guaranteed integration: verify current documentation, authenticated access, pricing, permissions, and data-export behavior before use.


Boundaries

  • Do not publish, send, present, or upload sales collateral without approval of the final audience, claims, and version.
  • Do not invent customer quotes, logos, benchmarks, savings, integrations, or product capabilities; cite the source for each proof point and label modeled ROI.
  • Do not decide pricing, contract terms, discounts, guarantees, or legal commitments. Route those decisions to their accountable owner.

Routing

  • Use suede-product-marketing for approved positioning and proof context.
  • Use suede-competitors for comparison and battle-card evidence.
  • Use suede-pricing for pricing and packaging decisions.
  • Use suede-revops for pipeline stages, routing, and deal-desk operations.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Suede AI Android app factory: plan, build, test, and prepare a production native Android app from product idea to a Play-ready signed bundle. Use for requests to create, ship, monetize, or modernize an Android app. Covers Kotlin and Jetpack Compose architecture, live target-API and Play policy checks, 16 KB page sizes, accessibility, privacy and Data Safety, Play Billing Library 8+, Play Integrity, account deletion, kids and Families rules, testing, performance, store assets, signing, and a release evidence gate. NOT FOR: uploading, promoting, or rolling out a build on Play (use suede-play-release); turning a website into an iOS app (use site-to-ios-app); a review-only pass on an existing app (use suede-code --findings-only); Play listing, keyword, and screenshot strategy (use suede-aso).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Design, review, and visually QA web and app interfaces against explicit design laws so shipped screens look intentional instead of generic AI output.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Suede AI workflow for turning a live website, PWA, dashboard, or marketplace into an iOS app. Use when the user has a site or web app and asks to put it on the App Store, wrap it in an app, ship an iOS version, or convert a PWA to native. Produces SITE_TO_IOS_AUDIT.md and SITE_TO_IOS_PLAN.md: URL audit, shell-vs-native strategy, App Store Guideline 4.2 wrapper risk and the native value that mitigates it, current SDK, privacy manifest, age rating, login and payment checks, kids-app rules, QA matrix, and a release gate. NOT FOR: Android builds or conversions (use android-app-factory); Google Play uploads and rollouts (use suede-play-release); App Store listing, keyword, and screenshot strategy (use suede-aso).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Suede AI experimentation discipline: hypotheses, sample size and power, test duration, guardrail metrics, significance and readouts, sequential designs, and an ICE-ranked experiment backlog with a reusable playbook. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment program and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), writing the variant copy (use suede-copy), or channel-level incrementality and geo holdouts (use suede-attribution).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

Suede AI paid-media creative system: angles, hooks, headlines, primary text, RSA and Performance Max assets, static and motion concepts, iOS-native reveal videos, grounded batch production, client review pages, and iteration from performance data, all checked against platform character limits. Use when producing or iterating ad creative for Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, or X from real product, review, and performance inputs. NOT FOR: campaign budgets, bidding, or targeting (use suede-ads), statistical test design (use suede-ab-testing), organic social posts (use suede-social), general marketing images such as OG or hero graphics (use suede-image), or landing-page copy (use suede-copy).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

suede-ads

무료

Suede AI paid-acquisition operating system for channel choice, campaign structure, audiences, bidding, budget pacing, negative keywords, retargeting, B2B and ABM playbooks, and kill-or-scale decisions, with platform facts checked in October 2026 (Meta Andromeda and attribution windows, Performance Max controls). Use when planning, auditing, or optimizing paid campaigns on Google, Meta, LinkedIn, X, TikTok, or comparable platforms. NOT FOR: producing ad copy or creative variants (use suede-ad-creative), implementing tracking (use suede-analytics), attribution models or reconciliation (use suede-attribution), or the landing page (use suede-site-alchemy).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills1252026년 10월 24일 업데이트

JasonColapietro의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고