본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

adobe-rate-limits

Design service-specific controls for Adobe workloads, including request admission, Retry-After handling, capped retries, and queues with spend limits. It helps respond to 429 errors and scaling pressure using verified service constraints and test evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Implement service-specific Adobe admission control, Retry-After handling, bounded retries, and spend-aware queues. Use when scaling workloads or handling 429 responses. Trigger with "Adobe rate limit", "Adobe 429", or "Adobe backoff".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Handling Adobe 429 responses using Retry-After
  • Setting bounded retries for transient idempotent work
  • Planning queue limits and backpressure for larger workloads
  • Load-testing controls with synthetic data

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Adobe Throttling and Backpressure

Overview

Implement service-specific Adobe admission control, Retry-After handling, bounded retries, and spend-aware queues. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

Adobe limits differ by service, operation, entitlement, and contract. Recheck first-party limits at execution. A valid Retry-After response is authoritative; absence requires conservative capped exponential backoff with jitter, not a remembered universal rate. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Partition control by approved credential, organization, service, operation, and tenant without exposing tokens or multiplying credentials to evade policy.

Instructions

  1. Inventory traffic, operations, concurrency, queues, retry chains, job durations, transactions, and downstream acknowledgements.
  2. Read current service limits and capture observed 429 headers and error bodies from sanitized evidence.
  3. Set conservative token buckets, concurrency, queue size, and spend ceilings below verified constraints.
  4. Retry only classified transient, idempotent work; honor valid server delay and cap attempts plus elapsed time.
  5. Quarantine ambiguous writes/jobs and propagate backpressure rather than recursively retrying.
  6. Load-test with synthetic data, publish the safe envelope, and assign an emergency reduction switch.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Workload, budget, and sandbox owners approve load tests and capacity changes. Do not add organizations, users, keys, or projects to circumvent limits.

Error Handling

  • Fixed pack-wide RPM tables are forbidden.
  • Do not retry 401, 403, content-policy, validation, or terminal job failures blindly.
  • Stop before the retry budget becomes a spend amplifier.

Output

Return cited current constraints, observed headers, control settings, retry matrix, queue policy, load curve, spend guard, and rollback. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Recover from a 429 with Retry-After.
  • Demonstrate queue shedding when the elapsed retry budget expires.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • burst
  • missing delay
  • valid delay
  • ambiguous job
  • queue saturation
  • vendor outage

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고