본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

alchemy-security-basics

Review security in Alchemy applications across credentials, browser access, wallet signing authority, and webhook verification. Map trust boundaries, define data checks, and collect evidence from secret scans and failure tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. Use when securing an Alchemy-backed application. Trigger with "secure Alchemy", "Alchemy API key exposure", or "verify an Alchemy webhook".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Reviewing Alchemy credentials for exposure
  • Checking browser access restrictions
  • Validating Notify webhook signatures
  • Separating read access from wallet signing authority

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Alchemy Credential and Trust-Boundary Security

Overview

Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and negative-path evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Alchemy documentation for the selected product, chain, feature, client, authentication method, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, application, security, data/privacy, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the requested scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures, a credential canary, explicit success criteria, and a tested rollback boundary.

Current Contract

An Alchemy application key identifies and limits provider access but is not a wallet private key. Frontend use is not categorically forbidden: current guidance supports explicit allowlists and recommends short-lived JWTs where appropriate. Admin keys, Notify tokens, webhook signing keys, and transaction signing authority remain server-side and separately controlled.

Authentication

Create a credential matrix covering application keys, access keys, Admin access, Notify management, webhook verification, and wallet signers. Assign owner, storage, runtime, scopes/allowlists, rotation, revocation, monitoring, and incident procedure to each.

Instructions

  1. Map browser, edge, server, CI, webhook, admin, and wallet trust boundaries and the data crossing each boundary.
  2. Choose server header auth for confidential workloads; if browser access is justified, apply exact allowlists or short-lived JWTs and test bypass conditions.
  3. Validate chain IDs, addresses, block selectors, contract ABIs, method allowlists, response sizes, and remote NFT metadata before use.
  4. Keep read clients separate from signers; require explicit transaction simulation, user intent, policy checks, and approval in a distinct workflow.
  5. Verify Notify payloads against the raw body using HMAC-SHA256 and the per-webhook signing key before parsing or side effects.
  6. Run source, artifact, log, browser-bundle, and configuration secret scans; exercise rotation and incident response before production.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, wallet addresses, customer data, plan changes, spend, key creation or rotation, webhook changes, deployment, replay, transaction construction, signing, broadcast, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Security approves browser keys, JWT issuers, secret stores, signing boundaries, and incident response. Wallet transactions, new allowlists, credential rotation, or revocation require the named owner.

Error Handling

  • Do not compare webhook signatures with ordinary string equality or after reserializing JSON.
  • Do not let an application API key or read client imply transaction-signing permission.
  • If credential material is exposed, fail closed, rotate or revoke it, inspect downstream use, and preserve a redacted receipt.

Output

Return the threat model, credential matrix, browser/server decision, input and response controls, signer separation, webhook verification contract, scan evidence, rotation exercise, and open risks. Mark assumptions, observations, source dates, environment-specific behavior, owners, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Approve a restricted browser read only after proving the configured origin allowlist rejects an unlisted origin and the bundle contains no broader credential.
  • Reject a webhook whose signature is valid only after JSON reserialization because verification must cover the exact raw body.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • unlisted browser origin
  • expired short-lived JWT
  • wrong chain
  • oversized response
  • bad webhook signature
  • secret canary in build artifact

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Alchemy sources before execution.
  • Treat observed account, application, network, indexer, chain, or provider behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal guarantee.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고