본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

algolia-data-handling

Review records and user events sent to Algolia. Maps data flows, identifies unnecessary fields, and develops correction and deletion procedures with verification evidence, giving privacy owners a technical basis for reviewing data handling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Design and audit the data lifecycle for records and user events sent to Algolia. Use when minimizing indexed fields, handling deletion requests, or documenting retention and privacy boundaries. Trigger with "Algolia privacy", "delete Algolia user data", or "index data review".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Reduce unnecessary fields in search records
  • Plan record and event deletion for user requests
  • Check how source data corrections reach Algolia
  • Document data flows and retention responsibilities

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Algolia Data Handling Review

Overview

This skill maps which data leaves the source system, how it becomes searchable records or events, and how correction and deletion propagate. It does not claim legal compliance; it produces technical evidence for the responsible privacy owner.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Index only fields required for retrieval, ranking, filtering, display, or approved analytics.
  • Treat attributesToRetrieve as response shaping, not as a substitute for excluding sensitive data from records.
  • Keep source-system identity mappings so corrections and deletions are reproducible.
  • Handle record deletion and Insights user-token deletion as separate surfaces with separate evidence.

Authentication

Use a restricted backend write key for record changes and the documented authorization for user-data deletion. Never include raw secrets or direct personal identifiers in logs or example events.

Instructions

  1. Inventory record fields, derived attributes, event fields, user tokens, environments, and downstream exports.
  2. Classify each field by purpose, sensitivity, source authority, and deletion requirement.
  3. Remove unnecessary fields before indexing and test that UI and ranking behavior still work.
  4. Implement idempotent correction and deletion paths with request IDs and target indices.
  5. Verify absence using bounded lookups and preserve evidence without retaining the deleted value.
  6. Document retention ownership, incident escalation, and gaps for privacy or legal review.

Approval Boundaries

Do not make legal conclusions, bulk-delete records, change retention policy, or expose protected values while verifying a request.

Output

Return the data-flow map, field inventory, minimization changes, deletion/correction procedure, verification evidence, unresolved provider retention questions, and named policy owner.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Identity mapping missingStop and reconcile the source identity before deletion.
Deletion task incompleteRetain the task ID and verify state before closing.
Event token contains PIIStop sending it and escalate remediation.
Policy answer unavailableRecord the question for the privacy owner or provider.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

request=privacy-123; surfaces=records,events; indices=customer_search

Expected handoff:

records=removed-and-verified; events=requested; legal-determination=not-made

Resources

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고