본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

algolia-observability

Plan observability for an application's Algolia search journey. Define measurements for availability, latency, index freshness, relevance, and event health, then map them to dashboards, alerts, traces, and service objectives using product baselines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Instrument an Algolia integration for actionable availability, latency, freshness, relevance, and event-health signals. Use when defining dashboards, alerts, traces, or service objectives. Trigger with "monitor Algolia", "Algolia metrics", or "search observability".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Planning dashboards for an Algolia search journey
  • Separating application and provider latency
  • Monitoring index freshness after publication
  • Defining alerts from measured service baselines

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Algolia Search Observability

Overview

This skill instruments the application-owned search journey rather than substituting generic provider claims. It connects client outcomes, request IDs, index publication, source freshness, and product-level relevance indicators.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Derive thresholds and objectives from the product SLO and measured baseline; do not use universal latency numbers.
  • Separate application latency from Algolia request latency and rendering time.
  • Track source snapshot to completed indexing task to searchable sentinel for freshness.
  • Treat event delivery and query-ID coverage as their own health surface.

Authentication

Telemetry must exclude API keys, raw personal data, sensitive queries, and unrestricted record payloads. Use approved read-only monitoring access where provider data is needed.

Instructions

  1. Define the user journey, owned SLOs, current baseline, and incident-routing owner.
  2. Instrument operation, outcome, duration, index alias, environment, SDK version, request ID, and bounded retry count.
  3. Add freshness markers linking source snapshot, task completion, and searchable sentinel.
  4. Measure no-result and event coverage using privacy-reviewed aggregation.
  5. Build dashboards and alerts from sustained error-budget or baseline deviation, not a copied threshold.
  6. Test telemetry during success, denial, timeout, stale-index, and event-failure scenarios.

Approval Boundaries

Do not log secrets or raw sensitive queries, create arbitrary alert thresholds, or enable high-cardinality labels without review.

Output

Return the signal catalog, field and redaction schema, SLO mapping, dashboards, alerts, synthetic checks, test evidence, and known blind spots.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Request ID unavailablePreserve local trace correlation and full redacted error metadata.
High cardinality detectedAggregate or hash approved identifiers.
Provider and app latency differSplit the spans and investigate the dominant segment.
No product SLO existsReport measurements and request an owner decision.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

journey=product-search; slo=company-owned; fields=operation,outcome,duration,index

Expected handoff:

secret-fields=blocked; freshness-sentinel=pass; alert-threshold=baseline-derived

Resources

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고