본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

anth-prod-checklist

Review Claude API integrations before production launch, covering credentials, error handling, costs, monitoring, and content safety. Collect test evidence, assess a limited rollout, and document approvals and rollback readiness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Execute production deployment checklist for Claude API integrations. Use when deploying Claude-powered features to production, preparing for launch, or implementing go-live validation. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic production", "deploy claude", "claude go-live", "anthropic launch checklist", "production ready claude".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Reviewing a Claude API feature before launch
  • Checking rate limits and cost alerts
  • Validating logs and output safety in staging
  • Assessing a gradual rollout and rollback readiness

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Anthropic Production Checklist

Overview

Complete checklist for deploying Claude API integrations to production with reliability, observability, and cost controls.

Pre-Launch Checklist

Authentication & Keys

  • Production API key from dedicated Workspace
  • Key stored in secret manager (not env files on servers)
  • Key rotation procedure documented and tested
  • Separate keys for each environment (dev/staging/prod)

Error Handling

  • All 5 error types handled: authentication_error, invalid_request_error, rate_limit_error, api_error, overloaded_error
  • SDK maxRetries set (recommended: 3-5 for production)
  • Custom error logging with request-id captured
  • Circuit breaker for sustained API failures

Rate Limits & Cost

  • Usage tier verified at console.anthropic.com
  • Application-level rate limiting implemented
  • Cost alerts configured (monthly spend caps)
  • Model selection optimized (Haiku for simple tasks, Sonnet for complex)
  • max_tokens set to realistic values (not inflated)
  • Prompt caching enabled for repeated system prompts

Reliability

  • Timeout configured (timeout parameter, recommended 60-120s)
  • Graceful degradation when API is unavailable
  • Health check endpoint tests API connectivity
async def health_check():
    try:
        # Use token counting as a cheap health probe (no generation cost)
        count = client.messages.count_tokens(
            model="claude-haiku-4-20250514",
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "ping"}]
        )
        return {"status": "healthy", "tokens": count.input_tokens}
    except Exception as e:
        return {"status": "degraded", "error": str(e)}

Observability

  • Request/response logging (redact content, keep metadata)
  • Latency tracking (p50, p95, p99)
  • Token usage tracking (input + output per request)
  • Cost tracking per feature/customer
  • Error rate alerting (429s, 5xx, timeouts)
import logging
import time

logger = logging.getLogger("anthropic")

def tracked_create(**kwargs):
    start = time.monotonic()
    try:
        response = client.messages.create(**kwargs)
        duration = time.monotonic() - start
        logger.info(
            "claude_request",
            extra={
                "request_id": response._request_id,
                "model": response.model,
                "input_tokens": response.usage.input_tokens,
                "output_tokens": response.usage.output_tokens,
                "duration_ms": int(duration * 1000),
                "stop_reason": response.stop_reason,
            }
        )
        return response
    except Exception as e:
        duration = time.monotonic() - start
        logger.error("claude_error", extra={"error": str(e), "duration_ms": int(duration * 1000)})
        raise

Content Safety

  • System prompts reviewed for injection resistance
  • User input validated and length-limited
  • Output scanned for sensitive data leakage
  • Content moderation for user-facing responses

Infrastructure

  • Deployment uses canary/rolling strategy
  • Rollback procedure documented and tested
  • Runbook created (see anth-incident-runbook)
  • On-call escalation path defined

Alerting Thresholds

MetricWarningCritical
Error rate (5xx)> 1%> 5%
p99 latency> 10s> 30s
429 rate> 5/min> 20/min
Daily cost> 80% budget> 100% budget
Auth failures (401/403)> 0> 0 (immediate)

Prerequisites

  • Have an approved release/artifact digest, production workspace, secret-manager reference, owner/on-call, change record, canary plan, and tested rollback command.
  • Define the model/version, data classification, allowed destinations, retention, budget, rate-limit, latency, error, and content-safety thresholds for this release.
  • Prepare synthetic fixtures and a staging environment that matches production policy; never validate readiness with live customer content or by printing credentials.

Instructions

  1. Confirm every checklist item with an evidence link or redacted receipt: authentication, workspace isolation, model/version, error handling, limits, cost, observability, content safety, and rollback.
  2. Run staging contract, health, synthetic redaction, timeout, rate-limit, permission, and output-safety tests. Verify logs/metrics contain metadata only and that deletion/retention behavior is proven.
  3. Deploy the approved artifact to a small internal canary. Monitor p95/p99 latency, 4xx/5xx/429, token/cost aggregates, rate-limit headroom, and policy probes; halt on any critical threshold.
  4. Require owner and on-call approval before staged production promotion. Preserve the prior revision and ensure the rollback path is executable without exposing secrets or content.
  5. After rollout, issue a redacted receipt, revoke temporary test access, and retain only the evidence required by the documented policy.

Output

Produce a go-live receipt containing artifact/config digests, workspace/model classes, checklist evidence, synthetic test results, canary and threshold outcomes, approvals, rollout state, retention cleanup, and rollback reference. Exclude API keys, prompts, responses, customer identifiers, and raw exception text.

Error Handling

Gate failureRequired response
Authentication, workspace, or permission check failsDo not deploy; verify secret binding and scope, then rotate/revoke only through the approved process.
429/5xx, timeout, latency, or budget threshold failsHalt promotion, apply bounded degradation/circuit breaking, and roll back to the prior revision.
Redaction, content-safety, or retention check failsStop traffic, quarantine affected artifacts, correct the boundary, and rerun staging evidence.
Missing approval or unverifiable evidenceMark release not ready; do not bypass the gate.

Examples

For artifact=sha256:fixture in staging, run synthetic fixture-request-001, assert sensitive_content_logged=0; contacts_exported=0; rollback_test=pass, then canary 1% internal traffic. A failed 429 gate records go_live=halted; rollback=prior-revision and sends no further production traffic.

Resources

Next Steps

For version upgrades, see anth-upgrade-migration.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고