본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

apify-prod-checklist

Prepare an Apify Actor, a program running on the platform, for production. Check configuration and builds, then set up scheduled runs, event notifications, health monitoring, rollback, and a spending limit that stops over-budget runs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Production readiness checklist for Apify Actor deployments. Use when deploying an Actor to production, preparing for launch, or validating Actor configuration, scheduling, monitoring, and rollback before going live. Trigger with "apify production", "deploy actor to prod", "apify go-live", "apify launch checklist", "actor production ready".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Checking an Actor before its first production deployment
  • Setting up scheduled runs and completion notifications
  • Monitoring failures, timeouts, and running costs
  • Preparing rollback and budget limits

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB
  • references/examples.md1.9 KB
  • references/implementation.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Apify Production Checklist

Overview

Complete checklist for deploying Actors to the Apify platform and integrating them into production applications. Covers Actor configuration, scheduling, monitoring, alerting, and rollback. Work top to bottom: clear the pre-deployment gates, then run the six deploy steps, then wire the alert conditions.

Prerequisites

  • Actor tested locally with apify run
  • apify login configured with production token
  • Familiarity with apify-core-workflow-a and apify-deploy-integration

Pre-Deployment Checklist

Actor Configuration

  • .actor/actor.json has correct name, title, description
  • INPUT_SCHEMA.json validates all required inputs
  • Dockerfile uses pinned base image version (apify/actor-node:20, not latest)
  • package-lock.json committed (deterministic installs)
  • Memory set appropriately (start at 1024MB, tune after profiling)
  • Timeout set with buffer (2x expected runtime)

Code Quality

  • Actor.main() wraps entry point (handles init/exit/errors)
  • failedRequestHandler logs failures without crashing Actor
  • Input validation at Actor start (if (!input?.startUrls) throw ...)
  • No hardcoded URLs, credentials, or magic numbers
  • Proxy configured for target sites that block datacenter IPs
  • maxRequestsPerCrawl set to prevent runaway costs

Data Output

  • Dataset schema documented (consistent field names)
  • SUMMARY key-value store record saved with run stats
  • Large payloads chunked (9MB dataset push limit)
  • PII sanitized before storage

Instructions

Read the Actor's .actor/actor.json, INPUT_SCHEMA.json, and Dockerfile first to confirm the pre-deployment gates above, then run the six deploy steps. Each step's full command and code block lives in references/implementation.md; the skeleton is below.

  1. Deploy Actor — apify push, then apify builds ls to confirm the build, then apify actors call with a small production-like input to smoke-test on-platform.
  2. Configure Scheduling — create a cron schedule with client.schedules().create({...}) (or Apify Console: Actors > Your Actor > Schedules). Set cronExpression, runInput, and runOptions (memory/timeout).
  3. Set Up Webhooks — client.webhooks().create({...}) on ACTOR.RUN.SUCCEEDED/FAILED/TIMED_OUT with a payloadTemplate posting runId, status, and datasetId to your server.
  4. Monitor Runs — a checkActorHealth(actorId, lookbackHours) helper lists recent runs and reports success rate, failures, timeouts, and total cost.
  5. Implement Rollback — apify builds ls, then repoint the Actor at a prior build via the POST /v2/acts/ACTOR_ID?build=N API, or redeploy from a git tag.
  6. Cost Guard — runWithCostGuard(actorId, input, maxCostUsd) polls usageTotalUsd every 30s and aborts the run if it exceeds budget.

The first deploy step in full:

# Build and push to Apify platform
apify push

# Verify the build succeeded
apify builds ls

Output

Working through this skill produces a production-ready Actor with:

  • A pushed, verified build (apify builds ls shows a SUCCEEDED build).
  • A live cron schedule and a completion webhook firing on success/failure/timeout.
  • A repeatable health check printing success rate, failure/timeout counts, and 24h cost.
  • A tested rollback path (build repoint or git-tag redeploy).
  • A cost guard that aborts runs exceeding budget.

Health-check output looks like:

Actor: username/product-scraper
Last 24h: 3 runs, 66.7% success
Failed: 1, Timed out: 0
Total cost: $0.4213

Production Alert Conditions

AlertConditionSeverity
Run failedstatus === 'FAILED'P1
Run timed outstatus === 'TIMED-OUT'P2
Low yieldDataset items < expected thresholdP2
High costusageTotalUsd > budgetP2
Consecutive failures3+ failures in a rowP1
No runs in windowSchedule didn't triggerP1

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
Build fails on platformLocal deps differCommit package-lock.json
Schedule not firingCron syntax errorValidate at crontab.guru
Webhook not receivedURL not reachableUse ngrok for testing; check HTTPS
Memory exceededWorkload too largeIncrease memory or reduce concurrency
Unexpected cost spikeNo maxRequestsPerCrawlAlways set an upper bound

Examples

Four worked examples — a first production deploy, health-check output, a cost guard aborting a runaway run, and a build rollback — are in references/examples.md. A first production deploy in brief:

# Smoke-test on-platform with a tiny input before scheduling
apify actors call username/product-scraper \
  --input='{"startUrls":[{"url":"https://target.com"}],"maxItems":10}'

Then create the daily schedule and completion webhook (implementation.md Steps 2–3).

Resources

Next Steps

Once production is stable, plan version upgrades with the apify-upgrade-migration skill: it covers bumping the Actor base image, migrating INPUT_SCHEMA.json fields without breaking existing schedules, and re-running this checklist against the new build before repointing traffic.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고