본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

apify-security-basics

Harden an Apify setup by protecting API tokens and proxy credentials, separating secrets by environment, verifying webhooks, and keeping sensitive Actor data private. It also outlines token rotation and response steps for an exposed credential.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Secure Apify API tokens, configure proxy access, and protect Actor data. Use when hardening API key management, setting up environment-specific tokens, rotating a leaked token, or auditing Apify security configuration. Trigger with "apify security", "apify secrets", "secure apify token", "apify API key security", "rotate apify token".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Separating Apify tokens across environments
  • Rotating an exposed API token
  • Checking webhook source verification
  • Protecting scraped data and proxy credentials

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • references/examples.md2.0 KB
  • references/implementation.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Apify Security Basics

Overview

Security best practices for Apify API tokens, Actor data, proxy credentials, and webhook verification. Apify uses personal API tokens (prefixed apify_api_) for all authentication. Because a single token grants full account access with no per-token scoping, token hygiene is the whole game.

Prerequisites

  • Apify account with Console access
  • Understanding of environment variables
  • Access to your deployment platform's secrets management

Token Architecture

Apify uses a single API token per user account for full API access. There is no scope-based permission system per token, so token security is critical.

Token TypeFormatWhere to Find
Personal API tokenapify_api_...Console > Settings > Integrations
Proxy passwordAlphanumericConsole > Proxy > Connection settings

Instructions

Follow the six hardening steps in order. Each has a lean summary below; the full copy-paste code for every step is in references/implementation.md.

  1. Secure token storage — keep the token in .env (never hardcoded) and add .env, .env.*.local, and storage/ to .gitignore. Validate presence at startup so the app fails fast:

    function requireToken(): string {
      const token = process.env.APIFY_TOKEN;
      if (!token) throw new Error('APIFY_TOKEN is required');
      if (!token.startsWith('apify_api_')) console.warn('unexpected token prefix');
      return token;
    }
    
  2. Per-environment token isolation — separate tokens (ideally separate accounts) for dev / staging / prod, injected via each platform's secret store (gh secret set, vercel env add, GCP Secret Manager).

  3. Token rotation — generate the new token first (old stays valid), push to every environment, verify it authenticates, then revoke the old one.

  4. Webhook payload verification — Apify does not sign webhooks; confirm the run ID in the payload actually exists, or gate on a shared URL secret compared with crypto.timingSafeEqual.

  5. Actor data security — redact sensitive fields before pushData; keep datasets named and private (no public sharing).

  6. Proxy security — never log proxyConfig.newUrl() (it embeds the proxy password); log the proxy group only.

See references/implementation.md for the complete code of every step, and references/examples.md for end-to-end scenarios.

Output

Applying this skill produces a hardened project state:

  • A .gitignore that excludes .env* and storage/, with no token in the tree.
  • A startup token validator that throws on a missing/malformed APIFY_TOKEN.
  • Environment-specific tokens wired into each platform's secret store.
  • A documented rotation procedure and a completed Security Checklist (below).
  • Webhook handlers that reject unverified runs and pipelines that redact PII before storage.

Security Checklist

  • APIFY_TOKEN stored in environment variables (never hardcoded)
  • .env and storage/ in .gitignore
  • Separate tokens for dev/staging/prod
  • Token rotation schedule documented
  • Webhook endpoints verify source
  • Proxy URLs never logged
  • Scraped PII redacted before storage
  • Named datasets used for sensitive data (no public sharing)
  • CI/CD secrets configured (not in repo)

Leaked Token Response

If a token is exposed:

  1. Immediately regenerate token in Console > Settings > Integrations
  2. Check recent Actor runs for unauthorized usage
  3. Review billing for unexpected charges
  4. Rotate proxy password if exposed
  5. Audit git history: git log --all -p -- '*.env' '*.json' | grep apify_api_

Error Handling

IssueDetectionMitigation
Token in git historygit log -p | grep apify_api_Rotate token, use BFG to clean
Unauthorized runsUnexpected runs in ConsoleRotate token immediately
Proxy password exposedCredentials in logsRegenerate proxy password
Data breach in datasetPII in public datasetDelete dataset, sanitize pipeline

Examples

Quick starting point — bootstrap a new project's secrets safely:

cat >> .gitignore <<'EOF'
.env
.env.*.local
storage/
EOF
echo 'APIFY_TOKEN=apify_api_dev_token' > .env
git status --short   # .env must NOT appear

Four full worked scenarios — secure bootstrap, cross-environment rotation, webhook-verify-then-sanitize, and a git-history leak audit — are in references/examples.md.

Resources

Next Steps

For production deployment hardening beyond secrets — health checks, rate limits, and monitoring — see the apify-prod-checklist skill in this pack.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고