본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

apollo-incident-runbook

Respond to Apollo.io API incidents with severity classification, diagnostic scripts, and recovery procedures. Use temporary call blocking and cached responses to handle failures, then document the timeline, customer impact, and corrective actions in a post-incident review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Apollo.io incident response procedures. Use when handling Apollo outages, debugging production issues, or responding to integration failures. Trigger with phrases like "apollo incident", "apollo outage", "apollo down", "apollo production issue", "apollo emergency".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Triage an Apollo.io API outage
  • Diagnose authentication and rate-limit failures
  • Plan cached responses during an outage
  • Document an incident review

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • references/implementation-guide.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Apollo Incident Runbook

Overview

Structured incident response for Apollo.io API failures. Covers severity classification, quick diagnosis, circuit breaker implementation, graceful degradation, and post-incident review. Apollo's public status page is at status.apollo.io.

Prerequisites

  • Valid Apollo API key
  • Access to monitoring dashboards

Instructions

Step 1: Classify Severity

Severity | Criteria                                    | Response Time
---------+---------------------------------------------+--------------
P1       | Apollo API completely unreachable            | 15 min
         | All enrichments/searches returning 5xx       |
P2       | Partial failures (>10% error rate)           | 1 hour
         | Rate limiting blocking critical workflows    |
P3       | Intermittent errors (<10%), degraded latency | 4 hours
         | Non-critical endpoint failures               |
P4       | Cosmetic issues, minor data inconsistencies  | Next sprint

Step 2: Quick Diagnosis Script

#!/bin/bash
# scripts/apollo-diagnosis.sh
set -euo pipefail
echo "=== Apollo Quick Diagnosis $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) ==="

# 1. Check Apollo status page
echo -e "\n--- Status Page ---"
curl -s https://status.apollo.io/api/v2/status.json 2>/dev/null | \
  python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Status: {d[\"status\"][\"description\"]}')" \
  2>/dev/null || echo "Could not reach status page"

# 2. Test auth
echo -e "\n--- Auth Check ---"
curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code} in %{time_total}s\n" \
  -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/auth/health" | head -1

# 3. Test people search (free endpoint)
echo -e "\n--- People Search ---"
curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code} in %{time_total}s\n" -o /dev/null \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"q_organization_domains_list":["apollo.io"],"per_page":1}' \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/mixed_people/api_search"

# 4. Check rate limit headers
echo -e "\n--- Rate Limits ---"
curl -s -D - -o /dev/null \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"q_organization_domains_list":["apollo.io"],"per_page":1}' \
  "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/mixed_people/api_search" 2>/dev/null | grep -i "x-rate-limit" || echo "No rate limit headers"

# 5. DNS resolution
echo -e "\n--- DNS ---"
dig +short api.apollo.io 2>/dev/null || nslookup api.apollo.io 2>/dev/null || echo "DNS lookup failed"

Step 3: Circuit Breaker

// src/resilience/circuit-breaker.ts
type State = 'closed' | 'open' | 'half-open';

export class CircuitBreaker {
  private state: State = 'closed';
  private failures = 0;
  private lastFailure = 0;
  private halfOpenSuccesses = 0;

  constructor(
    private failureThreshold: number = 5,
    private resetTimeoutMs: number = 60_000,
    private requiredSuccesses: number = 3,
  ) {}

  async execute<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>, fallback?: () => T): Promise<T> {
    if (this.state === 'open') {
      if (Date.now() - this.lastFailure > this.resetTimeoutMs) {
        this.state = 'half-open';
        this.halfOpenSuccesses = 0;
      } else {
        if (fallback) return fallback();
        throw new Error(`Circuit OPEN — Apollo calls blocked for ${Math.round((this.resetTimeoutMs - (Date.now() - this.lastFailure)) / 1000)}s`);
      }
    }

    try {
      const result = await fn();
      if (this.state === 'half-open') {
        this.halfOpenSuccesses++;
        if (this.halfOpenSuccesses >= this.requiredSuccesses) {
          this.state = 'closed';
          this.failures = 0;
        }
      } else {
        this.failures = 0;
      }
      return result;
    } catch (err) {
      this.failures++;
      this.lastFailure = Date.now();
      if (this.failures >= this.failureThreshold) this.state = 'open';
      if (fallback) return fallback();
      throw err;
    }
  }

  get status() { return { state: this.state, failures: this.failures }; }
}

Step 4: Graceful Degradation by Severity

import { CircuitBreaker } from './circuit-breaker';

const breaker = new CircuitBreaker(5, 60_000);

// P1: Total outage — serve cached data
async function handleP1() {
  console.error('[P1] Apollo API unreachable');
  return breaker.execute(
    () => client.post('/mixed_people/api_search', { per_page: 1 }),
    () => {
      console.warn('Serving cached search results');
      return { data: { people: [], source: 'cache', degraded: true } };
    },
  );
}

// P2: Partial failures — reduce load
async function handleP2() {
  console.warn('[P2] Apollo degraded — reducing concurrency');
  // Disable bulk enrichment, reduce search concurrency to 1
  // Continue serving search from cache where possible
}

// P3: Intermittent — retry with backoff
async function handleP3() {
  console.info('[P3] Intermittent errors — backoff enabled');
  // Retry with longer delays, log for monitoring
}

Step 5: Post-Incident Review Template

## Post-Incident Review: Apollo Integration

**Incident ID:** INC-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN
**Severity:** P1 / P2 / P3
**Duration:** HH:MM start to HH:MM resolved (X minutes)
**Apollo Status Page:** Reporting outage? Y/N

### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| HH:MM | First alert fired (source: Prometheus/PagerDuty) |
| HH:MM | On-call acknowledged |
| HH:MM | Root cause identified |
| HH:MM | Mitigation applied (circuit breaker / cache fallback) |
| HH:MM | Apollo API restored |
| HH:MM | Circuit breaker closed, normal operations resumed |

### Impact
- Searches affected: N requests failed / served from cache
- Enrichments failed: N (credits not consumed)
- Sequences paused: N contacts delayed
- Revenue impact: $X (estimated pipeline delay)

### Root Cause
[Apollo-side outage / rate limiting / key rotation / network issue]

### Action Items
- [ ] Add/improve circuit breaker coverage (owner, due)
- [ ] Increase cache TTL for critical data (owner, due)
- [ ] Add alerting for [specific gap] (owner, due)

Output

  • Severity classification matrix (P1-P4) with response times
  • Bash diagnostic script (status page, auth, search, rate limits, DNS)
  • Circuit breaker with closed/open/half-open states
  • Graceful degradation procedures per severity level
  • Post-incident review template

Examples

During a suspected provider outage, the on-call engineer opens an incident, captures the status-page result and redacted diagnostic status codes, and switches the affected read path to its documented cache fallback. Enrichment and sequence writes stay paused while the circuit is open so unknown outcomes are not replayed. After Apollo recovers, allow the circuit breaker’s half-open probes to succeed before restoring normal traffic, then reconcile the queued work with idempotency keys or operator review. Close the incident only after the timeline, customer impact, and a tested corrective action are recorded.

Error Handling

IssueEscalation
P1 > 15 minPage on-call, open Apollo support ticket
P2 > 2 hoursNotify engineering management
Recurring P3Promote to P2 tracking issue
Apollo outageVerify at status.apollo.io, enable cache fallback

Resources

Next Steps

Proceed to apollo-data-handling for data management.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고