본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

appfolio-rate-limits

Control AppFolio API request rates and retries during bulk synchronization. Use endpoint limits, server-specified waits, saved progress, and duplicate-write protection to determine when batches should resume, pause, or require operator review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Handle AppFolio API rate limits with throttling and backoff. Trigger: "appfolio rate limit".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Handling 429 errors during bulk synchronization
  • Controlling request rates for nightly portfolio syncs
  • Preventing duplicate writes after a lost response
  • Pausing and resuming interrupted batches

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AppFolio Rate Limits

Overview

AppFolio's Stack API enforces per-partner rate limits to protect shared property management infrastructure. High-volume operations like bulk tenant imports, rent-roll syncs, and work-order batch updates can quickly exhaust quotas. Property managers running nightly portfolio syncs across hundreds of units must throttle carefully, especially during month-end when lease renewals and payment processing spike concurrently.

Prerequisites

  • A verified per-endpoint limit from the current AppFolio partner contract or response headers; do not rely on a generic rate value for tenant writes.
  • Persisted batch cursors, idempotency keys for every write, and an operator policy for pausing month-end or other safety-sensitive workloads.
  • A staging fixture and request-budget owner who can prove retries, 429 behavior, and unknown-write handling without touching production tenants.

Instructions

  1. Select the limiter ceiling for the specific endpoint and keep concurrency below the smallest applicable portfolio or partner limit.
  2. Acquire a token before each request, honor Retry-After, and cap retries with jitter for transient provider failures.
  3. Process writes from a persisted cursor with idempotency keys; never replay a tenant create just because the response was lost.
  4. Pause and escalate batches that exhaust the retry budget, hit a maintenance window, or have an unknown write outcome.

Rate Limit Reference

EndpointLimitWindowScope
Properties list/get120 req1 minutePer partner key
Tenant create/update30 req1 minutePer partner key
Work orders60 req1 minutePer partner key
Bulk data export5 req1 hourPer partner key
Webhooks registration10 req1 minutePer partner key

Rate Limiter Implementation

class AppFolioRateLimiter {
  private tokens: number;
  private lastRefill: number;
  private readonly maxTokens: number;
  private readonly refillRate: number; // tokens per ms

  constructor(maxPerMinute: number) {
    this.maxTokens = maxPerMinute;
    this.tokens = maxPerMinute;
    this.lastRefill = Date.now();
    this.refillRate = maxPerMinute / 60_000;
  }

  async acquire(): Promise<void> {
    for (;;) {
      this.refill();
      if (this.tokens >= 1) {
        this.tokens -= 1;
        return;
      }
      // Wait until the next token is available; no later request is needed to
      // wake this caller.
      const waitMs = Math.max(1, Math.ceil((1 - this.tokens) / this.refillRate));
      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, waitMs));
    }
  }

  private refill() {
    const now = Date.now();
    this.tokens = Math.min(this.maxTokens, this.tokens + (now - this.lastRefill) * this.refillRate);
    this.lastRefill = now;
  }
}

const limiter = new AppFolioRateLimiter(25); // configure per endpoint contract

Retry Strategy

async function appfolioRetry<T>(fn: () => Promise<Response>, maxRetries = 4): Promise<T> {
  for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= maxRetries; attempt++) {
    await limiter.acquire();
    const res = await fn();
    if (res.ok) return res.json();
    if (res.status === 429) {
      const retryAfter = parseInt(res.headers.get("Retry-After") || "10", 10);
      const delay = retryAfter * 1000 + Math.random() * 2000;
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay));
      continue;
    }
    if (res.status >= 500 && attempt < maxRetries) {
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, Math.pow(2, attempt) * 1000));
      continue;
    }
    throw new Error(`AppFolio API ${res.status}: ${await res.text()}`);
  }
  throw new Error("Max retries exceeded");
}

Batch Processing

async function batchSyncTenants(tenants: any[], batchSize = 25) {
  const results: any[] = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < tenants.length; i += batchSize) {
    const batch = tenants.slice(i, i + batchSize);
    const batchResults = await Promise.all(
      batch.map(t => appfolioRetry(() =>
        fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/tenants`, {
          method: "POST", headers, body: JSON.stringify(t),
        })
      ))
    );
    results.push(...batchResults);
    if (i + batchSize < tenants.length) await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 2000));
  }
  return results;
}

Error Handling

IssueCauseFix
429 Too Many RequestsExceeded partner rate limitBackoff using Retry-After header
403 on bulk exportHourly export cap reachedQueue exports with 15-min spacing
Timeout on property listLarge portfolio (500+ units)Paginate with per_page=50
409 Conflict on tenant updateConcurrent write to same tenantRetry with fresh ETag
503 during maintenanceScheduled nightly window (2-4 AM PT)Skip requests, retry after window

Output

  • A self-scheduling, endpoint-specific limiter that cannot strand queued work
  • Bounded retry outcomes with Retry-After evidence and redacted failure data
  • A persisted batch decision: completed, paused for later retry, or quarantined for operator reconciliation

Examples

For a sandbox tenant-update batch, set the limiter below the documented tenant write ceiling, process one record at a time with idempotency keys, and preserve the cursor after each confirmed result. Induce a 429 to prove that callers wait and resume without an additional request, then induce a lost response to prove the record is quarantined rather than blindly replayed. If rate headers conflict with the configured ceiling, retries exhaust, or maintenance starts, pause the batch and hand the cursor to the owner.

Resources

Next Steps

See appfolio-performance-tuning.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고