본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

apple-notes-ci-integration

Set up CI tests for Apple Notes automation on macOS using a mock client, a stand-in for Notes.app. It also defines a separate integration test path on a self-hosted Mac with automation permissions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Run Apple Notes automation in CI on macOS runners. Trigger: "apple notes CI".

연동 도구GitHub

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Running mock Apple Notes tests on pull requests
  • Adding syntax checks for JXA scripts
  • Testing Notes.app access on an authorized self-hosted Mac
  • Recording runner versions and test modes in CI summaries

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Apple Notes CI Integration

Overview

Apple Notes automation is macOS-only because it depends on the Apple Events subsystem and Notes.app. CI pipelines must use GitHub Actions macOS runners (macos-latest or macos-14). However, macOS CI runners have restricted TCC (Transparency, Consent, and Control) permissions, which means direct Notes.app automation via osascript will fail in CI. The standard pattern is to run unit tests against a mock JXA client in CI, and reserve real Notes.app integration tests for local macOS machines or self-hosted runners with pre-granted automation permissions.

Prerequisites

  • A Node 20+ project with deterministic dependencies and a mockable Notes client boundary.
  • A macOS runner only for syntax and mock tests; do not treat a GitHub-hosted runner as eligible for real Notes access.
  • A separately administered self-hosted Mac for opt-in integration tests, with an interactive user session and TCC consent granted through normal macOS or MDM controls.

Instructions

  1. Keep unit tests independent of Notes.app by injecting the mock client shown below.
  2. Run npm ci, lint, and mocked tests on every pull request.
  3. Gate any real integration job behind an explicit repository environment and a self-hosted runner label; do not run it for forks or untrusted pull requests.
  4. Record the macOS version and the job's test mode (mock or integration) in the job summary so a green mock job is not misread as device coverage.

GitHub Actions Workflow

# .github/workflows/notes-ci.yml
name: Notes Automation CI
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  unit-tests:
    runs-on: macos-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: "20", cache: "npm" }
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Verify macOS version
        run: sw_vers
      - name: Lint JXA scripts
        run: |
          # Validate JavaScript syntax in all .jxa files
          for f in scripts/*.jxa; do
            node --check "$f" 2>/dev/null || echo "WARN: $f is osascript-only"
          done
      - name: Unit tests (mocked Notes client)
        run: npm test
      - name: Validate JXA templates
        run: |
          # Ensure osascript can parse (but not execute) JXA scripts
          for f in scripts/*.jxa; do
            osascript -l JavaScript -e "$(cat "$f")" 2>&1 | grep -v "Not authorized" || true
          done

Mock Client for CI

// tests/mocks/notes-client.mock.ts
export class MockAppleNotesClient {
  private notes: Array<{ id: string; title: string; body: string; folder: string }> = [];

  createNote(title: string, body: string, folder = "Notes"): string {
    const id = `mock-note-${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2)}`;
    this.notes.push({ id, title, body, folder });
    return id;
  }

  listNotes() { return [...this.notes]; }
  getNote(id: string) { return this.notes.find(n => n.id === id) || null; }
  searchNotes(q: string) { return this.notes.filter(n => n.title.includes(q) || n.body.includes(q)); }
  deleteNote(id: string) { this.notes = this.notes.filter(n => n.id !== id); }
  getFolders() { return [...new Set(this.notes.map(n => n.folder))]; }
}

Self-Hosted Runner with TCC Pre-Approval

# On a self-hosted macOS runner, pre-grant automation permissions:
# 1. Open System Settings > Privacy & Security > Automation
# 2. Grant your CI user's terminal access to Notes.app
# 3. Verify with:
osascript -l JavaScript -e 'Application("Notes").defaultAccount.notes.length'

# Do not alter the TCC database with undocumented tools or disable SIP. Use a
# managed PPPC/MDM profile or grant consent interactively on the owned runner.

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
"Not authorized to send Apple events" in CITCC blocks automation on CI runnersUse mock client; real tests on self-hosted runner
osascript syntax errors not caughtJXA has no standalone linterUse node --check for JS syntax; parse-only validation
Flaky tests on macos-latestRunner image updates change Notes statePin to macos-14; always use mocked client
Tests pass locally, fail in CIDifferent macOS version or missing appCheck sw_vers output; ensure Notes.app exists on runner
Timeout waiting for Notes.appApp launch delay on cold runnerAdd open -a Notes && sleep 3 before osascript calls

Output

The CI lane produces a reproducible unit-test result against the mock client and a job summary identifying the runner image and test mode. A self-hosted integration lane, when enabled, additionally reports whether its pre-authorized Notes smoke test ran; it must fail closed if authorization is absent.

Examples

For a pull request, run only the mock lane: npm ci && npm test. For an approved release candidate on the protected self-hosted runner, run the same mocked tests first, then invoke one non-destructive read-only Notes smoke test. Never use CI to create or delete a user note merely to prove authorization.

Resources

Next Steps

For diagnosing CI failures, see apple-notes-common-errors. For production deployment of automation scripts, see apple-notes-deploy-integration.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고