본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

assisting-with-soc2-audit-preparation

Prepare for SOC 2 Type I or Type II audits by organizing evidence and reviewing controls against Trust Service Criteria. The skill identifies missing or weak controls and produces a readiness report, remediation backlog, and auditor interview guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Execute automate SOC 2 audit preparation including evidence gathering, control assessment, and compliance gap identification. Use when you need to prepare for SOC 2 audits, assess Trust Service Criteria compliance, document security controls, or generate readiness reports. Trigger with phrases like "SOC 2 audit preparation", "SOC 2 readiness assessment", "collect SOC 2 evidence", or "Trust Service Criteria compliance".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Preparing an evidence checklist for SOC 2 criteria
  • Assessing readiness across CC1–CC9
  • Reviewing access controls such as MFA and RBAC
  • Creating a remediation backlog before an audit

포함된 파일(9)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • assets/README.md308 B
  • references/errors.md1.2 KB
  • references/examples.md333 B
  • references/implementation.md3.2 KB
  • references/readiness-by-trust-service-category.md906 B
  • references/README.md60 B
  • scripts/generate_soc2_report.py3.6 KB
  • scripts/README.md564 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Assisting With SOC 2 Audit Preparation

Overview

Automate SOC 2 Type I and Type II audit preparation by assessing controls across the five AICPA Trust Service Criteria (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy). Inventory existing controls and evidence, perform gap analysis against each Common Criteria point (CC1-CC9), and produce an audit-ready evidence package with a readiness score and remediation backlog.

Prerequisites

  • Policy and procedure documentation accessible in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/docs/ (information security policy, incident response plan, BCP/DR plan, vendor management procedures)
  • Infrastructure-as-code and configuration files available for control verification
  • Cloud provider audit logs accessible (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Activity Log, GCP Audit Logs) or exported
  • Employee onboarding/offboarding and security awareness training records available
  • Change management and access review logs accessible
  • Write permissions for audit workspace in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/soc2-audit/

Instructions

  1. Define audit scope: confirm in-scope services, systems, data stores, and audit period (Type I: point-in-time; Type II: observation window, typically 3-12 months). Identify applicable Trust Service Categories beyond the required Security criteria.
  2. Assess CC1 -- Control Environment: verify organizational structure documentation, security policy, board oversight, and security role/responsibility matrix. Check for gaps in documented accountability.
  3. Assess CC6 -- Logical and Physical Access Controls: verify MFA implementation, RBAC policies, password policy enforcement, access review cadence, and automated deprovisioning. Flag privileged access without monitoring.
  4. Assess CC7 -- System Operations: check monitoring and alerting configurations, backup procedures and testing records, incident response logs, and capacity planning documentation.
  5. Assess CC8 -- Change Management: review change approval workflows, deployment pipelines, rollback procedures, and change logs for the audit period.
  6. Collect evidence artifacts: organize evidence into the standard directory structure under ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/soc2-audit/ with subdirectories per criteria (CC1-control-environment/, CC6-access-controls/, CC7-system-operations/, etc.).
  7. Test control effectiveness: for each control, verify design adequacy (properly designed?) and operating effectiveness (working as intended during the audit period?). Document test results with screenshots, log excerpts, or configuration exports.
  8. Perform gap analysis: classify findings as missing controls (critical gap), partially implemented controls (needs improvement), improperly documented controls (evidence gap), or ineffective controls (design/operating failure).
  9. Generate readiness report: produce ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/soc2-audit/readiness-report-YYYYMMDD.md with overall readiness score, per-criteria assessment with percentage, remediation roadmap with timelines, and evidence collection checklist.
  10. Prepare auditor interview guide: draft expected auditor questions by criteria area with suggested evidence references and talking points.

See references/implementation.md for the six-phase implementation guide. See references/readiness-by-trust-service-category.md for example per-criteria readiness breakdowns.

Output

  • Readiness Report: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/soc2-audit/readiness-report-YYYYMMDD.md with overall score and per-criteria pass/gap status
  • Evidence Inventory: organized artifact list mapped to specific CC control points
  • Gap Analysis: missing and partially implemented controls with severity and remediation priority
  • Remediation Backlog: prioritized tasks with effort estimates, owners, and target dates
  • Auditor Interview Guide: expected questions by criteria with evidence pointers

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Cannot locate security policy in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/docs/Documentation stored elsewhere or not yet createdRequest document locations; flag as critical evidence gap requiring immediate creation
Log retention < SOC 2 requirement (1 year)Insufficient log retention configurationNote current retention period; flag as gap; recommend extending to 12+ months
No incident response playbook foundUndocumented procedureFlag as critical gap; provide template for creating IR playbook
Cannot assess cloud controls without API accessNo CloudTrail/Audit Log exports availableRequest console screenshots or JSON exports as alternative evidence
Production and dev configs mixed in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/Environment separation unclearRequest environment labeling; risk of auditing wrong environment

Examples

  • "Prepare a SOC 2 evidence checklist for Security and Availability criteria for production systems."
  • "Generate a readiness gap analysis with remediation backlog for SOC 2 Type II, covering CC1 through CC9."
  • "Assess CC6 access control compliance: verify MFA, RBAC, deprovisioning, and privileged access monitoring."

Resources

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고