본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

attio-upgrade-migration

Use this skill to migrate an existing Attio integration when endpoints, schemas, client versions, or architecture change. It guides a contract comparison, compatibility work, shadow checks, a limited canary rollout, reconciliation, and a tested rollback plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Migrate an Attio integration through a contract-led inventory, OpenAPI and documentation diff, shadow validation, canary rollout, reconciliation, and tested rollback. Use when endpoint assumptions, client versions, schemas, or integration architecture must change. Trigger with "upgrade Attio integration", "Attio migration", or "Attio API contract change".

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Comparing an Attio integration with current API contracts
  • Planning schema or pagination changes
  • Checking a migration with shadow reads and fixtures
  • Rolling out to one workspace with rollback ready

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Attio Contract Migration

Overview

This skill migrates the integration that actually exists. It does not assume a generic historical version jump; it proves every affected endpoint and data shape against current Attio contracts.

Prerequisites

  • Current integration commit, dependencies, and deployment topology
  • Endpoint, scope, pagination, data-shape, and webhook inventory
  • Representative redacted fixtures and reconciliation queries
  • Canary cohort, rollback owner, and recovery objective

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inventory current assumptions and tests. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio documentation and OpenAPI. Use Write or Edit after the contract diff, rollout boundary, and rollback point are documented.

Current Contract

  • Validate method, path, scopes, request fields, response fields, value shapes, and pagination per endpoint.
  • Treat official OpenAPI as an input to the diff, not a substitute for behavioral fixtures and endpoint documentation.
  • Record and entry queries may use offset pagination and score-based rate accounting; other endpoints can expose cursors.
  • Webhook changes must preserve raw-body signature verification and at-least-once idempotency.

Authentication

Preserve tenant-to-token binding and least privilege throughout the migration. Any new scope requires explicit justification, administrator approval, and a reversible credential plan.

Instructions

  1. Freeze a baseline of call sites, dependencies, contracts, fixtures, metrics, and current production behavior.
  2. Diff each affected endpoint against official documentation and OpenAPI.
  3. Classify changes as compatible, additive, behavior-sensitive, or breaking.
  4. Add compatibility adapters and tests for pagination, value shapes, errors, idempotency, and redaction.
  5. Run shadow reads or dry-run comparisons and reconcile mismatches without customer-facing mutations.
  6. Canary one bounded workspace or workload with explicit health and rollback thresholds.
  7. Expand in stages, retain rollback until reconciliation passes, then remove obsolete paths deliberately.

Approval Boundaries

Do not add scopes, alter destructive mutations, switch all tenants, or remove the rollback path without owner approval and recorded evidence.

Output

Return the before-and-after contract matrix, risk classification, adapter plan, test evidence, shadow or canary results, reconciliation status, and rollback decision.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Official sources disagreePause the affected endpoint and preserve both references.
Shadow results divergeClassify the mismatch and keep production on the old path.
Canary error budget failsRoll back and retain captured redacted evidence.
Rollback cannot restore stateStop before rollout and repair recovery first.

Examples

Input:

change=replace hand-written record client; cohort=one test workspace

Expected handoff:

contract-diff=complete; shadow=matched; canary=pass; rollback=retained

Resources

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

jeremylongshore의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고