본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ce-dhh-rails-style

This skill should be used when writing Ruby and Rails code in DHH's distinctive 37signals style. It applies when writing Ruby code, Rails applications, creating models, controllers, or any Ruby file. Triggers on Ruby/Rails code generation, refactoring requests, code review, or when the user mentions DHH, 37signals, Basecamp, HEY, or Campfire style. Embodies REST purity, fat models, thin controllers, Current attributes, Hotwire patterns, and the "clarity over cleverness" philosophy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core스타 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(7)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • references/architecture.md12.8 KB
  • references/controllers.md6.2 KB
  • references/frontend.md10.4 KB
  • references/gems.md5.6 KB
  • references/models.md7.3 KB
  • references/testing.md6.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<objective> Apply 37signals/DHH Rails conventions to Ruby and Rails code. This skill provides comprehensive domain expertise extracted from analyzing production 37signals codebases (Fizzy/Campfire) and DHH's code review patterns. </objective>

<essential_principles>

Core Philosophy

"The best code is the code you don't write. The second best is the code that's obviously correct."

Vanilla Rails is plenty:

  • Rich domain models over service objects
  • CRUD controllers over custom actions
  • Concerns for horizontal code sharing
  • Records as state instead of boolean columns
  • Database-backed everything (no Redis)
  • Build solutions before reaching for gems

What they deliberately avoid:

  • devise (custom ~150-line auth instead)
  • pundit/cancancan (simple role checks in models)
  • sidekiq (Solid Queue uses database)
  • redis (database for everything)
  • view_component (partials work fine)
  • GraphQL (REST with Turbo sufficient)
  • factory_bot (fixtures are simpler)
  • rspec (Minitest ships with Rails)
  • Tailwind (native CSS with layers)

Development Philosophy:

  • Ship, Validate, Refine - prototype-quality code to production to learn
  • Fix root causes, not symptoms
  • Write-time operations over read-time computations
  • Database constraints over ActiveRecord validations </essential_principles>
<intake> What are you working on?
  1. Controllers - REST mapping, concerns, Turbo responses, API patterns
  2. Models - Concerns, state records, callbacks, scopes, POROs
  3. Views & Frontend - Turbo, Stimulus, CSS, partials
  4. Architecture - Routing, multi-tenancy, authentication, jobs, caching
  5. Testing - Minitest, fixtures, integration tests
  6. Gems & Dependencies - What to use vs avoid
  7. Code Review - Review code against DHH style
  8. General Guidance - Philosophy and conventions

Specify a number or describe your task. </intake>

<routing>
ResponseReference to Read
1, controllerreferences/controllers.md
2, modelreferences/models.md
3, view, frontend, turbo, stimulus, cssreferences/frontend.md
4, architecture, routing, auth, job, cachereferences/architecture.md
5, test, testing, minitest, fixturereferences/testing.md
6, gem, dependency, libraryreferences/gems.md
7, reviewRead all references, then review code
8, general taskRead relevant references based on context

After reading relevant references, apply patterns to the user's code. </routing>

<quick_reference>

Naming Conventions

Verbs: card.close, card.gild, board.publish (not set_style methods)

Predicates: card.closed?, card.golden? (derived from presence of related record)

Concerns: Adjectives describing capability (Closeable, Publishable, Watchable)

Controllers: Nouns matching resources (Cards::ClosuresController)

Scopes:

  • chronologically, reverse_chronologically, alphabetically, latest
  • preloaded (standard eager loading name)
  • indexed_by, sorted_by (parameterized)
  • active, unassigned (business terms, not SQL-ish)

REST Mapping

Instead of custom actions, create new resources:

POST /cards/:id/close    → POST /cards/:id/closure
DELETE /cards/:id/close  → DELETE /cards/:id/closure
POST /cards/:id/archive  → POST /cards/:id/archival

Ruby Syntax Preferences

# Symbol arrays with spaces inside brackets
before_action :set_message, only: %i[ show edit update destroy ]

# Private method indentation
  private
    def set_message
      @message = Message.find(params[:id])
    end

# Expression-less case for conditionals
case
when params[:before].present?
  messages.page_before(params[:before])
else
  messages.last_page
end

# Bang methods for fail-fast
@message = Message.create!(params)

# Ternaries for simple conditionals
@room.direct? ? @room.users : @message.mentionees

Key Patterns

State as Records:

Card.joins(:closure)         # closed cards
Card.where.missing(:closure) # open cards

Current Attributes:

belongs_to :creator, default: -> { Current.user }

Authorization on Models:

class User < ApplicationRecord
  def can_administer?(message)
    message.creator == self || admin?
  end
end

</quick_reference>

<reference_index>

Domain Knowledge

All detailed patterns in references/:

FileTopics
references/controllers.mdREST mapping, concerns, Turbo responses, API patterns, HTTP caching
references/models.mdConcerns, state records, callbacks, scopes, POROs, authorization, broadcasting
references/frontend.mdTurbo Streams, Stimulus controllers, CSS layers, OKLCH colors, partials
references/architecture.mdRouting, authentication, jobs, Current attributes, caching, database patterns
references/testing.mdMinitest, fixtures, unit/integration/system tests, testing patterns
references/gems.mdWhat they use vs avoid, decision framework, Gemfile examples
</reference_index>

<success_criteria> Code follows DHH style when:

  • Controllers map to CRUD verbs on resources
  • Models use concerns for horizontal behavior
  • State is tracked via records, not booleans
  • No unnecessary service objects or abstractions
  • Database-backed solutions preferred over external services
  • Tests use Minitest with fixtures
  • Turbo/Stimulus for interactivity (no heavy JS frameworks)
  • Native CSS with modern features (layers, OKLCH, nesting)
  • Authorization logic lives on User model
  • Jobs are shallow wrappers calling model methods </success_criteria>
<credits> Based on [The Unofficial 37signals/DHH Rails Style Guide](https://github.com/marckohlbrugge/unofficial-37signals-coding-style-guide) by [Marc Köhlbrugge](https://x.com/marckohlbrugge), generated through deep analysis of 265 pull requests from the Fizzy codebase.

Important Disclaimers:

  • LLM-generated guide - may contain inaccuracies
  • Code examples from Fizzy are licensed under the O'Saasy License
  • Not affiliated with or endorsed by 37signals </credits>

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

ask-matt

무료

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before writing a right-sized requirements document and planning implementation. Use for feature ideas, problem framing, when the user says 'let's brainstorm', or when they want to think through options before deciding what to build. Also use when a user describes a vague or ambitious feature request, asks 'what should we build', 'help me think through X', presents a problem with multiple valid solutions, or seems unsure about scope or direction — even if they don't explicitly ask to brainstorm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Clean up local branches whose remote tracking branch is gone. Use when the user says "clean up branches", "delete gone branches", "prune local branches", "clean gone", or wants to remove stale local branches that no longer exist on the remote. Also handles removing associated worktrees for branches that have them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

JesusFilm의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고