본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

lfg

Full autonomous engineering workflow

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core스타 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구GitHub

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • references/tracker-defer.md13.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

CRITICAL: You MUST execute every step below IN ORDER. Do NOT skip any required step. Do NOT jump ahead to coding or implementation. The plan phase (step 1) MUST be completed and verified BEFORE any work begins. Violating this order produces bad output.

When invoking any skill referenced below, resolve its name against the available-skills list the host platform provides and use that exact entry. Some platforms list skills under a plugin namespace (e.g., compound-engineering:ce-plan); others list the bare name. Invoking a short-form guess that isn't in the list will fail — always match a listed entry verbatim before calling the Skill/Task tool.

  1. Invoke the ce-plan skill with $ARGUMENTS.

    GATE: STOP. If ce-plan reported the task is non-software and cannot be processed in pipeline mode, stop the pipeline and inform the user that LFG requires software tasks. Otherwise, verify that the ce-plan workflow produced a plan file in docs/plans/. If no plan file was created, invoke ce-plan again with $ARGUMENTS. Do NOT proceed to step 2 until a written plan exists. Record the plan file path — it will be passed to ce-code-review in step 3.

  2. Invoke the ce-work skill.

    GATE: STOP. Verify that implementation work was performed - files were created or modified beyond the plan. Do NOT proceed to step 3 if no code changes were made.

  3. Invoke the ce-code-review skill with mode:autofix plan:<plan-path-from-step-1>.

    Pass the plan file path from step 1 so ce-code-review can verify requirements completeness. Read the Residual Actionable Work summary the skill emits.

  4. Persist review autofixes (REQUIRED after step 3, before residual handoff)

    Check git status --short. If ce-code-review mode:autofix changed files, stage only those review-fix files, commit them with fix(review): apply autofix feedback, and push the current branch before continuing. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. Do not proceed to step 5, run browser tests, or output DONE while review autofix edits remain only in the working tree. If no files changed, explicitly note that there were no review autofixes to persist.

  5. Autonomous residual handoff (only when step 3 reported one or more residual downstream-resolver findings; skip when it reported Residual actionable work: none.)

    Do not prompt the user. This step embraces the autopilot contract: residuals must become durable before DONE, but the agent never stops to ask.

    1. Load references/tracker-defer.md in non-interactive mode. Pass the residual actionable findings from step 3's summary (or the run artifact when the summary was truncated).

    2. Collect the structured return: { filed: [...], failed: [...], no_sink: [...] }.

    3. Compose a ## Residual Review Findings markdown section from the structured return:

      • For each item in filed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and a link to the tracker ticket URL.
      • For each item in failed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and the failure reason (e.g., Defer failed: gh returned 401 — tracker unavailable).
      • For each item in no_sink: a bullet with severity, file:line, and title inlined verbatim so the PR body or fallback file is the durable record.
    4. Detect the current branch's open PR without prompting:

      gh pr view --json number,url,body,state
      
    5. If an open PR exists, update it directly with gh; do not load any confirmation-driven PR update skill. Append or replace the ## Residual Review Findings section in the current PR body, write the new body to an OS temp file, then run:

      gh pr edit PR_NUMBER --body-file BODY_FILE
      
    6. If no open PR exists, create a tracked fallback file at docs/residual-review-findings/<branch-or-head-sha>.md containing the composed section and the source PR-review run context. Stage only that file, commit it with docs(review): record residual review findings, and push the current branch. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. This is the durable no-PR sink. Do not output DONE until either the existing PR body has been updated or this fallback file commit has been pushed. If both paths fail, stop and report the failed commands; do not silently proceed.

    Never block DONE on tracker filing failures once residuals have been durably recorded. A no_sink outcome is success only when the findings are present in the PR body or in the pushed fallback file.

  6. Invoke the ce-test-browser skill with mode:pipeline.

  7. Invoke the ce-commit-push-pr skill.

    This commits any remaining changes, pushes the branch, and opens a pull request. If step 5 already opened a PR (check with gh pr view --json number,url,state 2>/dev/null), skip PR creation but still commit and push any uncommitted changes.

  8. Output <promise>DONE</promise> when complete

Start with step 1 now. Remember: plan FIRST, then work. Never skip the plan.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

ask-matt

무료

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before writing a right-sized requirements document and planning implementation. Use for feature ideas, problem framing, when the user says 'let's brainstorm', or when they want to think through options before deciding what to build. Also use when a user describes a vague or ambitious feature request, asks 'what should we build', 'help me think through X', presents a problem with multiple valid solutions, or seems unsure about scope or direction — even if they don't explicitly ask to brainstorm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Clean up local branches whose remote tracking branch is gone. Use when the user says "clean up branches", "delete gone branches", "prune local branches", "clean gone", or wants to remove stale local branches that no longer exist on the remote. Also handles removing associated worktrees for branches that have them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JesusFilm/core252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

JesusFilm의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고