본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

nasa-ms-7009

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(13)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • chapters/ch01-ms-scope-criticality-programmatics.md3.5 KB
  • chapters/ch02-ms-development-evidence-capability.md3.3 KB
  • chapters/ch03-ms-verification-validation.md3.0 KB
  • chapters/ch04-ms-uncertainty-sensitivity.md3.0 KB
  • chapters/ch05-ms-use-results-assessment.md3.0 KB
  • chapters/ch06-ms-risk-and-decision-reporting.md3.2 KB
  • chapters/ch07-hdbk-lifecycle-implementation.md3.4 KB
  • cheatsheet.md1.6 KB
  • glossary.md1.8 KB
  • LICENSE1.2 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.5 KB
  • patterns.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<!-- argument-hint: [topic, facet, or chapter number] -->

NASA Standard for Models and Simulations (7009B + Handbook)

Source: NASA-STD-7009B (2024-03-05) with NASA-HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) (US Government work, public domain) | Chapters: 7

When to use

Reach for this pack when establishing or reviewing credibility of models and simulations that inform NASA (or NASA-like) critical decisions — criticality/intended use, M&S life-cycle planning, development pedigree and permissible uses, V&V domains, uncertainty/sensitivity, use-phase appropriateness, results assessment, and decision-maker reporting with mandatory warnings and risk acceptance.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the core frameworks below.
  • With a topic — ask about criticality, capability assessment, V&V domains, uncertainty, permissible use, results reporting, or handbook phases.
  • With a chapter — ask for ch01 through ch07.

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

Two-document stack

  • STD-7009B: Mandatory M&S requirements (shalls) across programmatics, development, and use/reporting.
  • HDBK-7009B: Implementation handbook — life-cycle phases, compliance interpretation, model/AI pedigree context, PM/Technical Authority roles.

Three-phase requirement spine

  1. Programmatics — intended use, criticality, plan, metrics, acceptance criteria, reviews, defects.
  2. Development — RWS/pedigree, CM of data/software, units, assumptions, math, limits, permissible uses, capability assessment, guidance; plus V&V and development uncertainty.
  3. Use and reporting — proposed use, appropriateness, inputs, setup, envelope control, messages, results assessment, risk, decision reporting.

Dual credibility assessments

AssessmentPrimary phaseRole
M&S capabilityDevelopment / releaseHow strong is the M&S product?
M&S resultsUse / analysisHow credible is this analysis outcome?

Use chain

Intended use → (develop) permissible uses + V&V domains → (operate) proposed use + appropriateness assessment.

Reporting control

Decision briefings carry warnings, uncertainty+method, assessment outcomes vs thresholds, reviews, qualifications, records, and risk-acceptance rationale — not plots alone.

Chapter Index

#SectionKey content
ch01Scope, Criticality, ProgrammaticsIntended use, criticality, plan, metrics, acceptance, reviews, defects
ch02Development Evidence and CapabilityPedigree, assumptions, limits, permissible uses, capability assessment, guidance
ch03Verification and ValidationVerify/validate shalls and domains of V&V
ch04Uncertainty and SensitivityReferent/model/use uncertainty; sensitivity records
ch05Use and Results AssessmentProposed use, inputs, setup, envelope, messages, results assessment
ch06Risk and Decision ReportingAnalysis risk, mandatory warnings, report contents, acceptance
ch07Handbook Life-Cycle DepthPhases, compliance, pedigree/AI, 7150.2 link, TA roles

Topic Index

  • Acceptance criteria / thresholds → ch01, ch06
  • AI / ML models as M&S → ch02, ch07
  • Assumptions and abstractions → ch02, ch06
  • Capability assessment → ch02, ch06, ch07
  • Criticality assessment → ch01
  • Decision-maker warnings → ch06
  • Defect / problem tracking → ch01, ch06
  • Domain of validation → ch03, ch05
  • Domain of verification → ch03, ch05
  • Input pedigree → ch05
  • Intended use → ch01
  • Life-cycle phases (handbook) → ch07
  • Permissible uses → ch02, ch05
  • Proposed use / appropriateness → ch05
  • Results assessment → ch05, ch06
  • Risk acceptance for M&S analysis → ch06
  • Sensitivity analysis → ch04, ch05
  • Technical Authority / PM roles → ch01, ch07
  • Uncertainty characterization → ch04, ch06
  • Units and coordinate frames → ch02
  • Verification → ch03
  • Validation → ch03

Supporting Files

  • glossary.md — M&S credibility terms with chapter references
  • patterns.md — implementation patterns (When/How/Trade-offs)
  • cheatsheet.md — spine, report must-haves, tells and smells

Scope & Limits

This pack covers NASA-STD-7009B (approved 2024-03-05) together with NASA-HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) as synthesized reference notes from a two-PDF extraction (metadata pages 88 + 175 = 263 source_pages). It does not reproduce the full requirements compliance matrix verbatim, replace delegated Technical Authority direction, fully detail NPR 7150.2 software engineering requirements, or teach end-to-end probabilistic risk assessment methods (see nasa-pra / nasa-risk). US Government public domain work. No source-material download link is published.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

automotive-signpost

무료

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

avionics-signpost

무료

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the avionics development assurance standards landscape: RTCA DO-178C / EUROCAE ED-12C and its supplements (DO-330/ED-215, DO-331/ED-218, DO-332/ED-217, DO-333/ED-216); RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80; SAE ARP4754B and ARP4761A; and the free regulator documents that recognise them (FAA AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, Order 8110.49A; EASA AMC 20-115D and AMC 20-152A). Contains no source content: each row carries only the designation, title, edition, owner, redistributability status, and the owner's URL. Use when you need to identify, cite, or locate an avionics standard; paywalled rows point to the owner, free rows point to the regulator text, and the FAA rows also name the in-repo faa-8110-49 pack.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

cisa-cpg

무료

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

dafman-63-119

무료

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

dau-se-guidebook

무료

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

digital-systems-engineering

무료

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

jgsystemsconsulting의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고