본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

paper-reading

Reads and analyzes academic papers (arXiv preprints, conference / journal PDFs, Zotero items) at three configurable depths: quick skim (2 min), standard read (10 min), or deep analysis (30 min). Produces structured digests covering problem, method, key innovation, results, limitations, reproducibility, hidden assumptions, and connections to the user's other work. Use when the user shares an arXiv link, PDF, or paper title and asks to read / summarize / digest / TL;DR / analyze / review / critique / explain / break down a paper, asks about a paper's contributions / methods / results / equations / figures, wants to compare two papers side by side, or needs a reading note for their records.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Paper Reading

Structured workflow for reading academic papers efficiently.

When to Use

  • User shares an arXiv link or PDF and asks to read/summarize it
  • User asks about a specific paper's contributions, methods, or results
  • User wants a reading digest for their records
  • User asks to compare a paper against related work

Reading Levels

Level 1: Quick Skim (2 min)

When: User just wants to know if a paper is worth reading

Output:

  • Paper title, authors, venue, year
  • One-paragraph summary (what problem, what method, what result)
  • Key contribution in one sentence
  • Relevance assessment to user's work
  • Recommendation: Read / Skip / Skim only

Level 2: Standard Read (10 min)

When: User wants to understand the paper's approach

Output:

  • Problem: What gap does this address?
  • Method: How do they solve it? (with key technical details)
  • Key innovation: What's genuinely new vs. incremental?
  • Results: Main numbers + comparison to baselines
  • Limitations: What they don't do, acknowledged or not
  • Connections: How does this relate to user's active projects?

Level 3: Deep Analysis (30 min)

When: User is seriously considering building on this paper

Output:

  • Everything from Level 2, plus:
  • Detailed methodology: Step-by-step technical walkthrough
  • Reproducibility assessment: Can you implement this from the paper alone?
  • Experimental design critique: Are the baselines fair? Metrics appropriate?
  • Hidden assumptions: What are they not saying?
  • Extension opportunities: How could this be improved or adapted?
  • Key equations/algorithms: Extracted and explained
  • Figure analysis: What do the key figures actually show?

Workflow

Step 1: Obtain Paper

arXiv link → Download PDF, extract text
PDF file → Extract text directly
Paper title → Search Semantic Scholar → get arXiv link → download
Zotero item → Get from local library

Step 2: Read at Requested Level

Follow the appropriate level template above. When in doubt, start with Level 2.

Step 3: Store Digest

After reading, save the digest:

  1. Store structured summary to local dashboard
  2. If user confirms, add/update Zotero entry with notes

Step 4: Connect to Context

  • Link to user's active projects if relevant
  • Suggest follow-up papers (from references or "cited by")
  • Note if this paper supports or contradicts prior reads

Reading Heuristics

For ML/AI papers:

  • Jump to Table 1 (main results) first — if the numbers aren't impressive, calibrate expectations
  • Check the ablation study — it reveals what actually matters in their method
  • Read the limitations/future work section — often more honest than the intro
  • Look at Appendix — important details are often buried there

For methods papers:

  • Focus on Figure 1 (method overview) + Section 3 (method) + Table 1 (results)
  • Skip related work on first pass — come back only if you need positioning context

For empirical papers:

  • Focus on experimental setup, metrics, and statistical significance
  • Check if baselines are fairly implemented (same hyperparameter search budget?)
  • Look for cherry-picked examples in qualitative analysis

Paper Comparison Mode

When user asks to compare two papers:

| Aspect       | Paper A          | Paper B          |
|--------------|------------------|------------------|
| Problem      |                  |                  |
| Method       |                  |                  |
| Data         |                  |                  |
| Key metric   |                  |                  |
| Advantage    |                  |                  |
| Limitation   |                  |                  |

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Generates publication-quality academic figures (framework diagrams, pipeline illustrations, system architectures, method overviews) from a paper's method text and a target caption, using a local PaperBanana multi-agent pipeline (Retriever → Planner → Stylist → Visualizer → Critic).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

Searches and discovers academic papers across multiple sources (Semantic Scholar, arXiv, Tavily, Exa, Gemini deep research, AMiner, Google Scholar) with adaptive engine selection based on query type. Returns ranked, deduplicated results with metadata (authors, venue, year, citations, abstract, PDF link). Use when the user asks to find papers / literature / publications / preprints / references on a topic, search for related work, look up a specific paper by title or DOI or arXiv ID, find papers by an author, find recent SOTA / state-of-the-art work, survey a research area, or run a deep / comprehensive literature search with synthesis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

Batch download academic paper full-text (PDF/XML) from a list of DOIs. Handles 25 DOI prefixes across 19 publisher families via three layered routes: (1) publisher TDM APIs requiring institutional subscription (Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, Springer Nature), (2) Open Access sources (Crossref, Unpaywall, OpenAlex), and (3) a browser-based fallback for paywalled publishers without TDM access (ACS, RSC, IEEE, AIP, IOP, APS, Annual Reviews, T&F, Chinese journals). Browser fallback offers two routes — Route A drives the user's logged-in Chrome via the OpenClaw `browser` tool with `profile="user"` (best for interactive sessions), Route B uses the standalone `auto-paper-harvester` CLI with its built-in Playwright (best for unattended bulk runs). Use when the user wants to harvest, scrape, fetch, or bulk-download papers from a DOI list, savedrecs export, or Excel; or wants to fill missing full-text PDFs for an existing literature collection. Triggers on phrases like "批量下载文献", "下载全文", "harvest papers", "scrape full text", "TDM API", "下载 Elsevier 全文", "Wiley 批量下载", "下载 PDF".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

Conducts a systematic related-work / literature-survey / state-of-the-art review for a research question by defining survey dimensions, searching each axis, building a taxonomy of prior work, identifying the gap, and producing a positioning narrative for a paper's Related Work section. Goes beyond a flat paper list to deliver structured analysis. Use when the user is starting a new research project and needs to map the landscape, asks "what's been done on X?" or "how does my idea compare to existing work?", needs to write or revise a Related Work / Background / Prior Art section, wants to identify a research gap or position their contribution, or asks to build a taxonomy of approaches in a research area.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

Extracts paper recommendations from social-media posts and online articles (小红书 / Xiaohongshu / RedNote, 微信公众号 / WeChat Official Accounts, Twitter / X threads, Reddit posts, Bilibili videos, blog posts, newsletters, Jina Reader URLs), identifies the underlying academic papers, locates the authoritative original sources (arXiv, conference proceedings, DOI), and triages relevance to the user's research before any library action. Use when the user forwards a social-media link, screenshot, or article that mentions a paper / method / model, asks to "find the original paper" from a blog or thread, shares a 调研贴 / 论文推荐 / paper recommendation post, or wants to evaluate whether a buzz-worthy paper is worth reading before adding it to Zotero.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

Manages a Zotero academic reference library through both the local API (localhost:23119, read-only) and the Web API (api.zotero.org, read-write), using a structured collection hierarchy (Inbox / Active Projects / Background / Reading Queue / Archive / Meta) plus project, status, priority, and type tags. Handles adding papers with full metadata, deduplication, attaching provenance notes, moving items between collections, updating tags after reading, listing the prioritized reading queue, and setting up the literature scaffold for a new project. Use when the user asks to add / save / file / organize a paper in Zotero, check / list / clean up the reading queue, move papers between collections, tag papers for a project, query their library ("what do I have on X?"), or set up Zotero for a new research project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jxtse/scientific-research-skills732026년 5월 19일 업데이트

jxtse의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고