N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Before designing, training, or auditing ANY model that replicates human-annotated labels, audit the annotation protocol's INPUT — the exact document/evidence the human labelers consulted — and give the model that same input. Use when: (1) designing a classifier/LLM extractor whose target is a hand-coded label set, (2) a label-replication model shows low recall concentrated in a label subset and the diagnosis on offer is "the label's information is not in the features", (3) reviewers propose construct splits (e.g. "designation vs record-evident"), adjudication sittings, or per-domain stop rules to explain residual disagreement with gold, (4) validating an extraction pipeline against labels transcribed from a source document. Symptom of the underlying failure: elaborate theory accumulates to explain why gold is "partially unpredictable" when the model was simply never shown the document the annotators read.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Raise real concurrency in asyncio LLM batch scorers built on the OpenAI SDK (AsyncOpenAI, including OpenAI-compatible providers like DeepSeek). Use when: (1) raising an asyncio.Semaphore above ~100 produces no throughput gain, (2) a batch pipeline saturates near 100 in-flight requests despite a larger semaphore, (3) planning a high-concurrency campaign against a provider with no hard rate limit (DeepSeek v4-flash tolerates 2000+ in flight). Root cause: AsyncOpenAI's default httpx pool caps max_connections at 100, silently bottlenecking any larger semaphore — you must pass a custom http_client with httpx.Limits sized to the semaphore.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote placement — full formatted \footnote{} or OOXML footnotes for legal and notes styles (Bluebook, OSCOLA, Chicago, APA, McGill) with Id./supra short forms; (3) restyle — convert existing footnote citations from one style to another. This skill is manual-invoke ONLY — trigger ONLY when the user explicitly runs /cite-placement or explicitly names the "cite-placement" skill. Do NOT auto-trigger on general citation, footnote, or reference requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Download the actual PDF binary from bot-gated sites (taxpolicycenter.org, urban.org, SSRN-hosted mirrors, think-tank/publisher sites) via the Wayback Machine id_ URL form. Use when: (1) curl/WebFetch of a .pdf URL returns HTML instead of a PDF even with a browser User-Agent, (2) pypdf fails with "invalid pdf header: b'<!DOC'" or "EOF marker not found" on a freshly downloaded file, (3) Firecrawl can parse the PDF to markdown but you need the original file on disk (e.g., filing a reference copy).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.