본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

pir-management

Use when the user asks to create, review, retire, or refine Priority Intelligence Requirements, or wants to align collection and analysis to the current PIR set. Covers the PIR lifecycle end-to-end.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR) Management

PIRs are the foundation of relevant intelligence. They define what stakeholders need to know and drive all collection and analysis priorities. Without PIRs, a CTI team produces intelligence nobody asked for.

What is a PIR?

A PIR is a question that, when answered, directly supports a stakeholder's decision-making. PIRs are:

  • Stakeholder-driven — not what the analyst finds interesting
  • Decision-oriented — answering them enables action
  • Bounded — specific enough to collect against
  • Reviewable — can be assessed for satisfaction

PIR Format (SMART)

Each PIR should be:

  • Specific: Clear scope and focus
  • Measurable: Can determine when it's answered
  • Achievable: Can be collected against with available resources
  • Relevant: Directly supports stakeholder decisions
  • Time-bound: Has a review/expiry date

PIR Template

Store in data/pirs/active/PIR-XXX-<slug>.md:

---
pir_id: PIR-001
title: "What ransomware groups are actively targeting the European healthcare sector?"
created: 2026-01-15
review_date: 2026-04-15
status: active
priority: high
stakeholder: CISO
collection_sources: [osint, virustotal, otx]
knowledge_cells: [ransomware-ecosystem]
last_satisfied: 2026-03-01
satisfaction_count: 3
---

## Context
Why this PIR matters to the stakeholder. What decisions depend on the answer.

## Standing Requirements
- Monitor for new ransomware campaigns targeting healthcare
- Track ransomware group infrastructure changes
- Assess likelihood of targeting our specific organisation

## Collection Guidance
- OSINT: Monitor vendor reports, ISAC feeds, government advisories
- Technical: Enrich IOCs from healthcare-targeted campaigns
- Dark web: Monitor ransomware leak sites for healthcare victims

## Satisfaction History
| Date | Product | Summary |
|------|---------|---------|
| 2026-03-01 | Flash Report FR-2026-03-01 | New BlackCat campaign targeting EU hospitals |
| 2026-02-15 | Intelligence Summary IS-2026-02-15 | Monthly ransomware landscape update |

PIR Lifecycle

1. Creation

  • Stakeholder engagement: "What do you need to know to do your job?"
  • Draft PIR in SMART format
  • Assign priority (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
  • Map to collection sources and knowledge cells
  • Set review date (default: quarterly)

2. Collection Planning

For each active PIR:

  • Identify collection sources that can answer it
  • Set up standing collection tasks
  • Map to relevant knowledge cells for context
  • Document collection guidance

3. Satisfaction

When intelligence answering a PIR is produced:

  • Link the product to the PIR
  • Update last_satisfied date
  • Increment satisfaction_count
  • Add to satisfaction history

4. Review (Quarterly)

For each active PIR:

  • Is this still relevant to the stakeholder?
  • Has it been satisfactorily answered?
  • Should priority change?
  • Should scope be adjusted?
  • Should it be retired?

5. Retirement

When a PIR is no longer needed:

  • Set status: retired
  • Move from data/pirs/active/ to data/pirs/archive/
  • Document reason for retirement

PIR Priority Guide

PriorityCriteriaCollection Effort
CriticalImminent threat to organisation, board-level concern, regulatory requirementDedicated resources, daily monitoring
HighActive threat landscape relevant to organisation, CISO priorityRegular monitoring, weekly reporting
MediumGeneral awareness need, emerging threat areaPeriodic collection, monthly reporting
LowBackground intelligence, professional developmentOpportunistic collection

Common PIR Examples

Strategic PIRs

  • "What nation-state actors are likely to target our sector in the next 12 months?"
  • "How is the ransomware threat landscape evolving, and what are the implications for our risk posture?"
  • "What emerging technologies or attack vectors could change our threat profile?"

Operational PIRs

  • "What TTPs are currently being used against organisations in our sector?"
  • "Which vulnerabilities are being actively exploited that affect our technology stack?"
  • "Are there any active campaigns targeting our supply chain?"

Tactical PIRs

  • "What IOCs are associated with current campaigns targeting our sector?"
  • "What detection rules should we prioritise for the current threat landscape?"
  • "Are any of our assets or credentials appearing on dark web marketplaces?"

Orchestrator Integration

The orchestrator should:

  1. Check active PIRs before starting any new work
  2. Route collection and analysis tasks to relevant PIRs
  3. Tag all products with related PIR IDs
  4. Alert when a Critical PIR hasn't been satisfied in 30+ days
  5. Facilitate quarterly PIR reviews

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

ach

무료

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026년 9월 30일 업데이트

Liberty91LTD의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고