AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks "what TLP should this be?", applying TLP markings to a finished product, or the tradecraft pipeline calls for TLP determination before sharing. Covers TLP v2.0 (CLEAR / GREEN / AMBER / AMBER+STRICT / RED).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Every intelligence output from this platform MUST have a TLP designation. This is enforced by platform rules and validated by hooks.
When to use: Information that would cause significant harm if shared beyond the named recipients. Sources may face risk.
When to use: Information that requires support to be effectively acted upon, limited to the recipient's organisation only.
When to use: Information that requires support to be effectively acted upon, and may be shared with clients/partners on a need-to-know basis.
When to use: Information useful for awareness within a broader community but not for public disclosure.
When to use: Information that carries minimal or no foreseeable risk of misuse. Public sharing is acceptable.
Is this information source-identifying or would sharing risk the source?
→ YES → TLP:RED
Would sharing beyond the recipient's org cause harm?
→ YES → Does it need to stay within a single org?
→ YES → TLP:AMBER+STRICT
→ NO (partners/clients may need it) → TLP:AMBER
Is this useful for community awareness but not public?
→ YES → TLP:GREEN
Is this safe for public consumption?
→ YES → TLP:CLEAR
| Product Type | Default TLP | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Flash report (active incident) | AMBER | Often contains org-specific context |
| Threat actor profile | GREEN | General awareness value |
| Campaign report | AMBER | May contain victim-identifying information |
| IOC list (enriched) | GREEN | Broadly useful for detection |
| Threat assessment | AMBER | Often tailored to specific stakeholder |
| Detection rules (SIGMA/YARA/KQL) | GREEN | Broadly useful for defence |
| STIX bundle | GREEN | Designed for automated sharing |
| Strategic landscape report | GREEN | General awareness |
These are defaults — always evaluate the specific content and adjust.
In file frontmatter:
tlp: GREEN
In report headers:
TLP:GREEN — This information may be shared within the security community
but should not be published on publicly accessible channels.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.