Use for any cap-table number, mechanic, or date before a founder signs, from a single SAFE, note or warrant described in chat or a quick 'is this dilution reasonable?' check to any draft or signed SAFE, note, term sheet, option plan, AoA, Carta XLSX, or spreadsheet. A single question gets a short cited answer in about 2–3 minutes; the full report, about 5–10 minutes, runs only when the founder shares documents or asks for it. Source-cited deterministic math (YC, NVCA, Cooley GO) for SAFE/note conversion, priced-round dilution, anti-dilution, option pools, warrants, MFN chains, dual-class voting, QSBS and Israeli §102 dates, and Israeli ↔ Delaware flips. NOT for waterfall modeling, cumulative dividends, RSUs, 83(b), 409A, SPAC, warrant repricing, or pure term definitions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Maps a startup's competitive landscape, scores moat strength across 6+ dimensions, and writes an investor-ready competition narrative with a positioning map. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, moat analysis, or positioning review and gives enough to work from: a deck, a list of competitors, or a clearly named startup. A full run takes about 30–40 minutes and searches the web, so for a passing question such as 'who are my competitors?' or 'is that a real moat?', answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, the competitor set and moat scores are checked adversarially, never recalled from memory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scores and strengthens startup pitch decks (pre-seed through Series A) against 35 investor-grade criteria grounded in Sequoia, DocSend, YC, a16z, and Carta data. Use when the user has shared a pitch deck (PDF, PPTX, markdown, pasted slide text, or a link to one) and asks for a review, score, feedback, or critique. A full review takes about 15–25 minutes, 40 or more for a long investor deck, so for a general pitch question with no deck, answer briefly in chat and offer the review instead of starting it. When it runs, score with the rubric, never with deck advice from memory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reviews startup financial models for investor readiness: validates unit economics, stress-tests runway scenarios, and benchmarks metrics against stage-appropriate targets. Use the full review, about 10–15 minutes, when the user provides a financial model (Excel, CSV, or a model pasted as text) and asks for review, validation, runway analysis, or unit-economics scoring. For a single money question with figures to compute, such as 'how long do I have?' or 'is a 4x burn multiple bad?', use its shorter quick check, so the answer comes from the calculator and dated benchmarks, not mental arithmetic.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simulates a realistic VC Investment Committee: three partner archetypes debate a startup's merits, concerns, and deal terms, scored across 28 dimensions. Use when the user asks to simulate an IC, or how partners would debate their startup, and gives a deck, a company description, or a specific fund. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes, so for a passing question such as 'would a VC fund us?' or 'are we fundable?', answer briefly in chat and offer the simulation instead of starting it. When it runs, partners' views come from the scored simulation, never improvised.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.