본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

lesson-quiz

Check your understanding of one Claude Code tutorial lesson with a 10-question quiz. Get feedback after each round, a final score, and specific topics to review, whether you take it before, during, or after studying.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Test a learner on a single Claude Code tutorial lesson (01-10) with 10 questions, scoring answers and flagging weak spots. Use before, during, or after a lesson. Don't use for whole-tutorial assessment or explaining a topic instead of testing it.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Check prior knowledge before a lesson
  • Check understanding while studying
  • Review weak areas after a lesson
  • Retake a quiz to check understanding again

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB
  • README.md2.1 KB
  • references/question-bank.md57.6 KB
  • references/results-template.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Lesson Quiz

Interactive quiz that tests understanding of a specific Claude Code lesson with 10 questions, provides per-question feedback, and identifies areas to review.

Prerequisites

This skill requires:

  • The tutorial repo checked out, so the lesson directories 01-slash-commands/ … 10-cli/ and each README.md are readable.
  • references/question-bank.md present in this skill (the source of all questions).

Before starting, confirm the target lesson's README.md exists. If it is missing, do not fabricate questions — warn the user and ask them to check the repository structure (see Error Handling).

Guardrails:

  • Never invent questions or answers. Ask only questions drawn from references/question-bank.md for the selected lesson; if the bank lacks entries for a lesson, say so rather than making them up.
  • Score accurately. Track which shuffled position holds the correct answer for every question and validate each response against it — never guess a score.
  • Confirm timing before scoring. The pre/during/after choice changes how results are framed; do not skip it.

Instructions

Step 1: Determine the Lesson

If the user provided a lesson as an argument (e.g., /lesson-quiz hooks or /lesson-quiz 03), map it to the lesson directory:

Lesson mapping:

  • 01, slash-commands, commands → 01-slash-commands
  • 02, memory → 02-memory
  • 03, skills → 03-skills
  • 04, subagents, agents → 04-subagents
  • 05, mcp → 05-mcp
  • 06, hooks → 06-hooks
  • 07, plugins → 07-plugins
  • 08, checkpoints, checkpoint → 08-checkpoints
  • 09, advanced, advanced-features → 09-advanced-features
  • 10, cli → 10-cli

If no argument was provided, present a selection prompt using AskUserQuestion:

Question 1 (header: "Lesson"): "Which lesson do you want to quiz on?" Options:

  1. "Slash Commands (01)" — Custom commands, skills, frontmatter, arguments
  2. "Memory (02)" — CLAUDE.md, memory hierarchy, rules, auto memory
  3. "Skills (03)" — Progressive disclosure, auto-invocation, SKILL.md
  4. "Subagents (04)" — Task delegation, agent config, isolation

Question 2 (header: "Lesson"): "Which lesson do you want to quiz on? (continued)" Options:

  1. "MCP (05)" — External integration, transport, servers, tool search
  2. "Hooks (06)" — Event automation, PreToolUse, exit codes, JSON I/O
  3. "Plugins (07)" — Bundled solutions, marketplace, plugin.json
  4. "More lessons..." — Checkpoints, Advanced Features, CLI

If "More lessons..." is selected, present:

Question 3 (header: "Lesson"): "Select your lesson:" Options:

  1. "Checkpoints (08)" — Rewind, restore, safe experimentation
  2. "Advanced Features (09)" — Planning, permissions, print mode, thinking
  3. "CLI Reference (10)" — Flags, output formats, scripting, piping

Step 2: Read the Lesson Content

Read the lesson README.md file to refresh context:

  • Read file: <lesson-directory>/README.md

Then use the question bank from references/question-bank.md for that lesson (10 pre-written questions with answers and explanations). To stay within the context budget, read only the one selected lesson's README — not all ten.

Step 3: Present the Quiz

Ask the user about quiz timing context:

Use AskUserQuestion (header: "Timing"): "When are you taking this quiz relative to the lesson?" Options:

  1. "Before (pre-test)" — I haven't read the lesson yet, testing my prior knowledge
  2. "During (progress check)" — I'm partway through the lesson
  3. "After (mastery check)" — I've completed the lesson and want to verify understanding

This context affects how the results are framed (see Step 5).

Step 4: Present Questions in Rounds

Present 10 questions from the question bank in rounds of 2 questions each (5 rounds total). Each question uses AskUserQuestion with the question text and 3-4 answer options.

IMPORTANT: Use AskUserQuestion with max 4 options per question, 2 questions per round.

For each round, present 2 questions. After the user answers each round, immediately show per-question feedback: whether each answer was correct or incorrect, and if incorrect, show the correct answer and a brief explanation. Then proceed to the next round. After all 5 rounds, proceed to final scoring.

Question format per round:

Each question from the question bank has:

  • question: The question text
  • options: 3-4 answer choices (one correct, labeled in the bank)
  • correct: The correct answer label
  • explanation: Why the answer is correct
  • category: "conceptual" or "practical"

CRITICAL — Shuffle answer options: For each question, you MUST randomize the order of the answer options before presenting them via AskUserQuestion. Do NOT present them in the order they appear in the question bank (A, B, C, D), and do NOT place the correct answer first. Use a different random permutation for each question. Track which shuffled position contains the correct answer so you can score accurately.

Example: If the question bank lists options A (correct), B, C, D — you might present them as: C, A, D, B. The correct answer is now in position 2.

Present each question using AskUserQuestion. Record the user's answer for each.

Step 5: Score and Present Results

After all rounds, calculate the score and present results.

Scoring:

  • Each correct answer = 1 point
  • Total possible = 10 points

Grade scale:

  • 9-10: Mastered — Excellent understanding
  • 7-8: Proficient — Good grasp, minor gaps
  • 5-6: Developing — Fundamentals understood, needs review
  • 3-4: Beginning — Significant gaps, review recommended
  • 0-2: Not yet — Start from the beginning of this lesson

Output format: Follow the report template in references/results-template.md. It defines the score line, the per-question results table, the "Incorrect Answers — Review These" block, the timing-specific message (pre-test / during / after), and the "Recommended Next Steps" section. Fill its bracketed placeholders with this run's data.

Step 6: Offer Follow-up

After presenting results, use AskUserQuestion:

"What would you like to do next?" Options:

  1. "Retake this quiz" — Try the same lesson quiz again
  2. "Quiz another lesson" — Switch to a different lesson
  3. "Explain a topic I missed" — Get a detailed explanation of an incorrect answer
  4. "Done" — End the quiz session

If Retake: Go back to Step 4 (skip timing question, use same timing). If Quiz another lesson: Go back to Step 1. If Explain a topic: Ask which question number, then read the relevant section from the lesson README.md and explain it with examples.

Acceptance Criteria

A completed quiz run must satisfy all of these — verify each before presenting final results:

  • Exactly one lesson (01-10) was resolved before any question was asked.
  • The timing context (before / during / after) was captured via AskUserQuestion.
  • 10 questions from references/question-bank.md for that lesson were presented, in 5 rounds of 2, with answer options shuffled per question.
  • Every answer was scored against the tracked correct-position, producing an integer score in the range 0-10.
  • Expected output: a ## Lesson Quiz Results report containing the score line (Score: N/10 with a grade label), the per-question results table, an "Incorrect Answers — Review These" block for each miss, and a timing-specific message.
  • The follow-up prompt (retake / another lesson / explain / done) was offered.

Example: for a 7/10 "after" run on Hooks, the report asserts Score: 7/10 — Proficient, lists all 10 rows in the results table, and expands the 3 incorrect questions with correct answer, explanation, and a review pointer.

Edge Cases & Error Handling

Invalid lesson argument

If the argument doesn't match any lesson, show the valid lesson list and ask the user to pick one.

User wants to quit mid-quiz

If the user indicates they want to stop during any round, present partial results for the questions answered so far (score out of the number attempted, not out of 10).

Lesson README not found

If the README.md file doesn't exist at the expected path, inform the user and suggest checking the repository structure. Do not proceed with fabricated content.

Question bank missing entries for a lesson

If references/question-bank.md has no questions for the resolved lesson, tell the user and stop — never invent questions to fill the gap.

Validation

Triggering test suite

Should trigger:

  • "quiz me on hooks"
  • "lesson quiz"
  • "test my knowledge of lesson 3"
  • "practice quiz for MCP"
  • "do I understand skills"
  • "quiz me on slash commands"
  • "lesson-quiz 06"
  • "test me on checkpoints"
  • "how well do I know the CLI"
  • "quiz me before I start the memory lesson"

Should NOT trigger:

  • "assess my overall level" (use /self-assessment)
  • "explain hooks to me"
  • "create a hook"
  • "what is MCP"
  • "review my code"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Turn ideas and reference materials into a blog draft with source citations. Work through research, topic development, an approved outline, and revisions, while saving source summaries and numbered drafts to track how the article develops.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turning an idea into a structured blog draft
  • Writing an article from research and reference materials
  • Revising an existing draft while keeping earlier versions
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn ideas and reference materials into a blog draft through research, discussion, and an approved outline. Produce cited articles tailored to the intended audience, then revise them while keeping each draft version.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turning an idea into a blog draft
  • Writing an article from research materials
  • Agreeing on an outline before drafting
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn ideas and reference materials into a blog draft through research, outline approval, and revision. The workflow includes source citations, adjustments for the intended audience and tone, and separate files for each draft version.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turning research materials into a blog post
  • Planning an article for a specific audience
  • Drafting articles with source citations
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn ideas and reference materials into a blog draft through research, outline approval, and revision. The workflow includes source citations, adjustments for the intended audience and tone, and separate files for each draft version.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Turning research materials into a blog post
  • Planning an article for a specific audience
  • Drafting articles with source citations
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Create marketing copy, customer messages, and public content with a consistent brand voice. Apply clear vocabulary, concise sentences, concrete examples, and a friendly, professional tone so readers can understand the value being offered.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Aligning marketing copy with a consistent brand voice
  • Keeping customer messages friendly and professional
  • Simplifying technical explanations for general readers
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Keep marketing copy, customer messages, and public content consistent with a defined brand voice. The skill provides rules for a friendly, professional tone, concise sentences, concrete examples, preferred terminology, and clear calls to action.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Keeping marketing copy consistent in tone
  • Writing customer messages in the brand's voice
  • Aligning terminology across public content
luongnv89/claude-howto4.3만2026년 10월 20일 업데이트

luongnv89의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고