본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

landing-page-generator

Write landing pages (PAS, AIDA, StoryBrand) from a brief or README, as HTML with privacy, terms, changelog, setup pages. Use for sales copy, hero sections, CTAs, README rewrites. Don't use for blogs, release notes, project docs, or coding mockups.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(12)

  • SKILL.md18.5 KB
  • docs/README.md5.8 KB
  • evals/evals.json20.6 KB
  • references/anti-slop-rules.md2.2 KB
  • references/companion-pages.md10.6 KB
  • references/final-report.md8.5 KB
  • references/page-build.md10.2 KB
  • references/readme-mode.md11.4 KB
  • references/readme-section-templates.md3.9 KB
  • references/readme-step-reports.md4.3 KB
  • references/section-templates.md13.2 KB
  • references/step-reports.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Landing Page Generator

Generate landing pages using proven copywriting frameworks (PAS, AIDA, StoryBrand). One skill, two modes: write conversion-focused marketing copy from a product brief, or transform an existing project README into a scannable, visual landing page. A full landing page ships with the companion pages its footer links to: Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, Changelog, and Docs, each where it applies. The last step builds the landing page and those pages as HTML with frontend-design.

Two Modes

Pick the mode that matches the input and deliverable:

ModeUse whenInputOutputWhere
A — Landing copyYou need marketing copy for a sales/landing pageProduct/service briefConversion-focused copy (hero → CTA) + A/B notes + companion page copy, in chat; the built pages in landing-page/This file, below
B — README landing pageYou have an existing project README.md to make persuasive and scannableRepo README.md + project filesRewritten README.md (mermaid, tables, collapsed details) + README.backup.md + companion page files + the built pages in landing-page/references/readme-mode.md

If the user asks to "turn my README into a landing page", "make my GitHub page sell the project", or similar, follow Mode B in references/readme-mode.md. Otherwise use Mode A below. When unsure which applies, ask.

Companion Pages

Decide each companion page from facts the brief or the project states, never from a guess. Record each decision with its reason:

PageApplies when
Privacy PolicyAlways
Terms of UseThe product has user accounts, a paid plan, a free trial, or a subscription. An open-source tool with none of these gets no Terms page: its license governs use
ChangelogAlways. Mode B links an existing history file instead of writing one
DocsThe product is a CLI, library/SDK, self-hosted service, plugin/extension, or API, or the brief or project names a setup step the product's users perform outside its UI (install command, API key, environment variable, config file, DNS record). Contributor setup does not count
  • If the user asks for a single section or says "landing page only", skip every companion page and record the skip.
  • If the user names extra pages, add them to the pages the table applies. If the user says "only" those pages, write only them and record the rest as skipped — not requested.
  • If the user asks for one companion page alone, write only that page and name the footer link it needs. Mode A runs Step 6 for it and asks only for a missing product name; a repo file follows references/readme-mode.md → Edge Cases.

Mode A delivers each page as a copy block in chat. Mode B writes PRIVACY.md, TERMS.md, CHANGELOG.md, and docs/getting-started.md, and never overwrites an existing file. Sources, templates, and checks: references/companion-pages.md.

Anti-Slop Rules

AI-generated marketing copy has predictable tells that kill credibility. See references/anti-slop-rules.md for banned phrases and structural patterns to avoid.

Quick test: read each sentence and ask "does this give the reader information they didn't already have?" If not, cut it.

Default Quality Bar

In both modes, the final deliverable (Mode A copy and its structure; Mode B README layout; the companion pages; the built pages) must be professional, production-ready, elegant, and premium, even when the user never asks. The brief or project voice decides the tone; this bar decides the finish:

  • Professional: precise and credible; no hype
  • Production-ready: ship-ready, every section complete; the only allowed gaps are labeled [proof needed] (Mode A) or [placeholder] (Mode B) markers
  • Elegant: concise, one consistent voice, clean scannable hierarchy
  • Premium: confident restraint, specific claims, polished formatting

These are qualities of the output, never words to put in it: do not write "premium", "elegant", or "world-class" into the copy.

Prerequisites

Before writing, confirm the user supplied enough detail to make specific claims:

  • Product/service name and target audience
  • Problem solved and primary desired action
  • Proof points, metrics, testimonials, or named differentiators
  • Pricing/trial/guarantee details if a pricing section is requested

If proof is missing, write placeholders clearly labeled [proof needed]; never invent customers, metrics, guarantees, scarcity, compliance claims, or commands.

Dependency Preflight (mandatory)

This skill optionally invokes frontend-design, declared in frontmatter dependencies, for the page build only (Mode A Step 7, Mode B Step 8). Before the first write:

command -v asm >/dev/null || echo "asm not installed: npm install -g agent-skill-manager"
asm deps discover "<this skill's directory>" --json
printf 'lp_session=%s\n' "landing-page-generator-$(date +%s)-$$"   # record it; reuse it verbatim

When the page build is reached, run asm deps acquire frontend-design --session <lp_session> --json and read the returned skillMdPath. If asm is missing or the acquire fails, read ~/.claude/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md or ~/.agents/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md. Do not acquire it when the build is skipped (references/page-build.md → Build decision). If an acquire ran, run asm deps release --session <lp_session> --json at the end, including an early stop. Without frontend-design, the run falls back to copy only and records page: not built — <reason>; it never skips the page silently.

Repo Sync Before Edits (mandatory)

Mode B rewrites README.md and writes companion page files inside the repo; the page build writes landing-page/. Sync before those writes to avoid clobbering remote work. If the working tree is not clean, stash first, sync, then restore:

branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
dirty=0
if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain)" ]; then
  git stash push -u -m "pre-sync"
  dirty=1
fi
git fetch origin
git pull --rebase origin "$branch"
if [ "$dirty" -eq 1 ]; then
  git stash pop
fi

If origin is missing, pull is unavailable, or rebase/stash conflicts occur, stop and ask the user before continuing. If a command after git stash push fails, run git rebase --abort (when a rebase is in progress), then git stash pop, then stop. Skip the sync and record sync: skipped (<reason>) when the user says to skip it, or when git rev-parse --show-toplevel is not the project directory (ask before syncing a parent repo). Mode A runs this section only before its page build writes into an existing folder (references/page-build.md → Output folder).

Workflow (Mode A — Landing copy)

Mode B (README landing page) has its own self-contained workflow in references/readme-mode.md.

Step 1: Gather Product/Service Information

Collect before writing:

InputPurpose
Product/service nameAnchor all copy
Target audienceTone, pain points, vocabulary
Problem solvedCore value prop
Competitive advantageDifferentiation
Desired visitor actionPrimary CTA
Social proofTestimonials, metrics, logos
Data collected, analytics, processorsPrivacy Policy
Accounts, plans, trial, billingTerms of Use
Release history: versions, dates, changesChangelog
Install and setup stepsDocs

If any core input is missing—product/service name, target audience, problem solved, or primary CTA—ask before proceeding. For missing proof, pricing, guarantee, or companion-page details, proceed with [proof needed] placeholders per Prerequisites and guardrails.

Step 2: Choose Copywriting Framework

FrameworkBest forStructure
PASPain-driven B2B, productivity toolsProblem → Agitate → Solution
AIDAConsumer apps, broad audiencesAttention → Interest → Desire → Action
StoryBrandNarrative brands, coaching, servicesHero → Guide → Plan → CTA → Success/Failure

Tell the user which framework you picked. Let them override.

Step 3: Generate Landing Page Sections

Populate every section in the framework-specific template from references/section-templates.md that matches the framework chosen in Step 2. Use that template's section names and order exactly—do not substitute a generic Hero/Problem/Solution layout when another framework applies.

Content quality (all frameworks):

  • Headlines: 10 words or fewer, value-led, specific to the audience
  • Subheadlines: 1–2 sentences that expand the headline without repeating it
  • Body copy: active voice, benefit-led; address pain points with concrete scenarios where the template calls for them
  • Features: 3–5 items described as outcomes, not feature lists
  • How It Works: 3–4 simple steps; icon concept + description per step; CTA at the end
  • Social proof: quote + name + role + company, or [proof needed] when proof is unavailable
  • Pricing (if applicable): feature comparison, recommended plan callout, guarantee copy or [proof needed]
  • FAQ: 5–7 common objections with clear, confident answers
  • CTAs: follow CTA Button Rules; place primary and secondary CTAs where the template specifies
  • Final CTA: risk reversal (guarantee, trial); urgency or scarcity only when genuine; button text reinforces value

Step 4: Format Output

Use the template matching the chosen framework in references/section-templates.md (PAS, AIDA, or StoryBrand). Keep large reusable structures in references to protect the agent's context budget; read only the reference needed for the requested output. End the landing copy with optimization notes: A/B test ideas and conversion tips.

Step 5: Copywriting Best Practices

  • Active voice, present tense
  • Benefits over features
  • Specific numbers and data where available
  • Address objections directly
  • Urgency without pressure tactics
  • Short, scannable sentences
  • "You" language (customer-focused)
  • Multiple CTAs throughout the page

CTA Button Rules

  • Start with an action verb
  • Be specific about the outcome
  • First person when appropriate ("Start My Free Trial")
  • Genuine urgency ("Get Instant Access")
  • Never generic ("Submit", "Click Here")

Step 6: Generate Companion Pages

If Companion Pages skips every page, write no COMPANION PAGES block: record the skip in this step's report and the Final Report, then go to Step 7.

  1. Decide each page with the Companion Pages table. Record it as delivered or skipped — <reason>.
  2. After the OPTIMIZATION NOTES, write the COMPANION PAGES block from references/companion-pages.md.
  3. Write each delivered page from its template in references/companion-pages.md.
  4. Run the companion checks in references/companion-pages.md. Fix each failure before delivery.

Step 7: Build the Final Page

Follow references/page-build.md:

  1. Decide the build with its Build decision table and record the page: entry.
  2. Acquire frontend-design (Dependency Preflight) and give it the Brief for frontend-design with the copy of each page.
  3. Run the Page checks. Fix each failure, then re-run the check.

The pages carry the copy's sections, CTAs, and [proof needed] markers verbatim. Without frontend-design, follow Fallback: copy only: the copy stands and the run is PARTIAL.

Example Triggers

  • "Write landing page copy for a B2B SaaS tool"
  • "Create sales page content using PAS framework"
  • "Generate hero section copy for my product"
  • "Write conversion-optimized CTAs"
  • "Help me with landing page headlines"
  • "Write the landing page, privacy policy, and changelog for my CLI tool"
  • "Write and build a landing page for my app"

Expected Output Example

Example input:

Generate a landing page for AcmeDesk, a helpdesk for solo founders. Audience: indie SaaS founders.
Primary CTA: Start free trial. Differentiator: setup in 10 minutes, shared inbox + AI drafts.

Expected output:

LANDING PAGE COPY
Product/Service: AcmeDesk
Framework: PAS

HERO SECTION
Headline: Answer Every Customer Without Hiring Support
Subheadline: AcmeDesk gives solo founders a shared inbox and AI draft replies that are ready in 10 minutes, not weeks.
CTA Button: "Start My Free Trial"
Trust Bar: [proof needed — add user count, testimonial, or response-time metric]
...
OPTIMIZATION NOTES
A/B Test Ideas: test speed-focused vs founder-control headlines.

COMPANION PAGES
Footer links: Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Changelog
Skipped: Docs — hosted app; the brief names no setup step outside the app

PRIVACY POLICY
Product/Service: AcmeDesk
Effective date: [proof needed — publication date]
...

page: built (landing-page/: index.html, privacy.html, terms.html, changelog.html)

Safety & Guardrails

  • Confirm missing inputs before generating a full page; if the user wants speed, proceed with clearly marked assumptions.
  • Treat unsupported claims as an error: add [proof needed] instead of fabricating metrics, logos, testimonials, awards, guarantees, medical/legal/financial outcomes, or fake urgency.
  • Validate every CTA against the CTA Button Rules before delivery.
  • Warn when the requested copy depends on regulated claims, competitor comparisons, or scarcity that requires legal or factual review.
  • Treat each Privacy Policy and Terms of Use as a draft for legal review. Name that review as a remaining user action on the Final Report's Decision: line.

Edge Cases

  • If the user asks for only one section, generate that section and a short note on how it fits the page.
  • If the product is vague, ask 2–4 targeted questions rather than writing generic copy.
  • If the user requests HTML or a design for the page, Step 7 builds it from the copy. If they want copy only, skip the build and record why. If they bring a finished design and want only its code, or ask for wireframes, SEO strategy, or UX critique, explain that this skill does not do it.
  • If social proof is unavailable, write a proof slot rather than a fake testimonial.

Final Report

End every run, stops included, with this compact text block. Status is COMPLETE (the deliverable is produced and every applicable check passes — Mode A: the full-page copy follows the chosen framework's template, or the requested single section plus its fit note is delivered; Mode B: README.md is rewritten, README.backup.md exists, and the Step 6 Self-Review Checklist passes; both modes: each applicable companion page is delivered, written, or linked and passes the companion checks, and the pages are built and pass the page checks or skipped at the user's request; companion pages only: each requested page passes the companion checks), PARTIAL (a deliverable was produced but a check still fails, or the page was not built), or BLOCKED (no deliverable: a required question went unanswered and the user ended the run, Mode B found no README.md and the user declined creating one, or Repo Sync stopped on a conflict). A question that awaits the user's answer does not end the run. Fill rules, PARTIAL and BLOCKED examples, and reader checks: references/final-report.md. Example:

Result: COMPLETE. Delivered full PAS landing copy for AcmeDesk (hero through final CTA), A/B test ideas, and Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Changelog pages, built as HTML in landing-page/; Docs skipped (hosted app, no setup outside the app).
Evidence: Framework PAS named and applied via references/section-templates.md; hero headline 8 words; every CTA starts with an action verb; pages: Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, Changelog delivered, Docs skipped (hosted app); companion checks Pages decided, Facts traced, No compliance claims, Footer links, Changelog style, Anti-slop passed; [proof needed] markers: 2 on the landing page, 18 on the companion pages; anti-slop check passed; page: built (landing-page/: index.html, privacy.html, terms.html, changelog.html) by frontend-design; page checks Pages built, Sections carried, CTAs carried, Markers carried (24/24), Nothing added, Notes excluded, Links resolve, Design checks passed; sync: skipped (new folder).
Uncertainty: Assumed a setup-time objection belongs in the FAQ; no data practices, legal entity, or release date were supplied, so those facts are markers; responsive rendering untested (no browser), breakpoints inspected in CSS.
Decision: No approval needed. Before publishing: replace the [proof needed] markers with real facts, and have a lawyer review the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Acceptance Criteria

Verify before delivering. When the run delivers companion pages only, only the companion and Final Report items apply:

  • Output follows the framework-specific template in references/section-templates.md or a user-specified subset.
  • Chosen framework is named and consistently applied.
  • Hero headline is 10 words or fewer, specific, and value-led.
  • Every CTA starts with an action verb and states the outcome.
  • Unsupported proof is labeled [proof needed]; no fake claims are present.
  • Copy passes references/anti-slop-rules.md.
  • Output meets the Default Quality Bar (professional, production-ready, elegant, premium) without the user asking.
  • Final response includes A/B test ideas and conversion tips unless the user asked for a single section.
  • Each companion page is recorded as delivered, linked, or skipped with its reason, and each delivered page passes the companion checks in references/companion-pages.md.
  • The run records a page: entry: built pages pass the page checks in references/page-build.md (sections, CTAs, and gap markers carried verbatim; nothing added), or the skip or fallback reason is stated.
  • The run closes with a Final Report: Result: and its status first, then Evidence:, Uncertainty:, and Decision: lines; Evidence: cites only checks that ran.
  • The Final Report passes the four reader checks in references/final-report.md (result findable, facts and assumptions separated, claims traceable, next decision clear). Without a human reviewer's answer, human understanding is unconfirmed.

Step Completion Reports

After each major step, emit a compact status block — per-check √/× lines and a closing Result: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL line. Mode A uses the format and per-step checks in references/step-reports.md; Mode B uses references/readme-step-reports.md.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Create, update, or audit AGENTS.md (default) or CLAUDE.md agent instructions: set up, prune, add a rule, or merge CLAUDE.md or .cursorrules into one file Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor all read. Don't use for READMEs, skills, or subagents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Find open AI engineering jobs that fit a candidate, verify location and apply links, and assess each employer's product. Use for one-off shortlists or a job alert's research step. Don't use for résumé writing, job applications, or company news.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Generate App Store screenshots and header/search images for iPhone, iPad and Mac from a codebase or landing page, or re-render a set. Use when preparing a submission. Don't use for ASO keywords, review audits, icons, videos, or Google Play.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Optimize App Store and Google Play listings via a 7-phase, plan-approval-gated ASO workflow (keyword strategy, metadata, localization). Don't use for web SEO, paid UA campaigns, or pre-submission compliance audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

auto-push

무료

Generate a commit message, stage all changes, and push to remote after scanning for secrets, large files, and protected-branch risks. Skip for opening PRs, code review, or cutting releases/tags.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

luongnv89/skills1362026년 10월 21일 업데이트

luongnv89의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고