Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing or changing any React component - React Testing Library tests are behavior-focused (byRole first), use user-event, assert on accessible output, one behavior per test, and run in npm test
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
A component test that queries by data-testid or asserts on internal state proves the implementation didn't change, not that the component works for a user. React Testing Library tests must exercise the component the way a user (and a screen reader) does: find things by role/label/text, interact with them, and assert on what actually rendered.
Core principle: Test behavior, not implementation. If a refactor that keeps the same user-facing behavior breaks the test, the test is coupled to the wrong thing.
byRole first. Prefer getByRole (with { name: ... }) over byLabelText/byText, and both over byTestId. byTestId is a last resort for a node with no accessible role or text — reach for it only when nothing else identifies the element, and treat its presence as a smell worth a follow-up (usually a missing label/role, per accessibility-basics).user-event over fireEvent. fireEvent.click fires one DOM event; userEvent.click simulates the real sequence of events a browser produces (focus, pointer, keyboard) and catches bugs fireEvent cannot (e.g. a control that only works because it happens to be focused). Always await userEvent.setup() / await user.click(...).aria-* state (aria-expanded, aria-invalid, aria-disabled), and focus — not component internals, prop values, or CSS class names."shows a validation error when the field is left empty"), not "renders correctly". Multiple assertions are fine as long as they all check the same behavior; a second, unrelated behavior gets its own test.npm test. New component test files must run under the project's existing npm test script (Vitest/Jest) with no extra flags — a suite that only runs when invoked by hand is not part of the pipeline (see ci-cd-pipeline-authoring).// ❌ implementation-coupled: breaks on any internal refactor, proves nothing
// about what the user sees
test("renders correctly", () => {
render(<LoginForm />);
expect(screen.getByTestId("submit-btn")).toBeInTheDocument();
});
// ✅ behavior-focused: fails only when the real user-facing behavior breaks
test("shows a validation error when submitting with an empty email", async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup();
render(<LoginForm />);
await user.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: /sign in/i }));
expect(screen.getByRole("alert")).toHaveTextContent(/email is required/i);
expect(screen.getByRole("textbox", { name: /email/i })).toHaveAttribute("aria-invalid", "true");
});
The second test finds the button and field the way a user would (by their accessible name), drives them with user-event, and asserts on what actually appears — it stays green through any internal rewrite that keeps this behavior.
data-testid when a role/label query would work — usually a sign the component is missing an accessible name in the first place.fireEvent for anything a real user would do with a mouse or keyboard.*.test.tsx file that npm test never picks up (wrong glob, wrong location) — decoration, not a gate.screen.getByTestId(...) with no comment on why no role/label query worked.fireEvent anywhere a user-event equivalent exists.npm test in CI never runs the new file.아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.