Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a test needs a database - spin up a dedicated, disposable test database (Testcontainers) seeded with known data, never a shared or production database
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Automated tests need a database that is real (same engine as production), isolated (no shared state), and seeded with known data. The answer is a disposable, per-run database — Testcontainers spins up a real Postgres in a container, migrated and seeded, torn down after.
Core principle: Real engine, disposable instance, known seed. Never point tests at a shared dev or production database, and never use an in-memory substitute whose SQL differs from production.
| Approach | Problem |
|---|---|
| Shared dev/staging DB | Flaky: other work mutates it; tests collide and depend on order |
| Production DB | Never — data risk, and tests would mutate real records |
| In-memory (H2/SQLite) | Dialect gaps: queries pass in H2, fail on Postgres → bugs ship |
| Disposable real DB (Testcontainers) | ✅ real engine, isolated, reproducible |
postgres:<same-major-as-prod>.@Testcontainers
class TaskExportIT {
@Container static PostgreSQLContainer<?> db =
new PostgreSQLContainer<>("postgres:16");
@BeforeAll static void migrate() { Flyway.configure().dataSource(db.getJdbcUrl(),
db.getUsername(), db.getPassword()).load().migrate(); } // real migrations
@BeforeEach void seed() {
// exactly the rows this scenario needs
insertProject("p1", "Demo");
insertTasks("p1", 3);
}
@Test void export_returns_all_tasks() {
var csv = export("p1");
assertEquals(3, csvRows(csv)); // asserts against the known seed
}
}
Same idea in Go (Testcontainers-Go), Node (testcontainers), etc. — a real Postgres, real migrations, explicit seed.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.