본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

anti-deception-checklist

Verification checklist to prevent fake success. Detects test deletion/disabling, coverage regression, lint bypass, secret exposure. Triggered by "deception", "fake" ("가짜"), "fake success", "verification" ("검증"), "checklist" ("체크리스트"), "deletion detection" ("삭제 탐지"), "regression" keywords.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Anti-Deception Verification Checklist

Use this checklist after code changes to detect "fake success." Even if the build turns green, it may be hiding problems rather than solving them.

Sensitive-Data Handling Contract

This skill detects possible exposure; it never needs the secret value. Do not read credential files or .env content to validate a finding. Detection output must contain only a file path and rule class, never the matching line, token, password, private key, PII, or surrounding context. Test fixtures must be obviously non-live and must not match a provider-valid credential format.

If a real secret may have entered Git history or CI output:

  1. stop the gate and avoid reproducing the value in an issue, PR, prompt, or log;
  2. identify the provider and owner from metadata, not by printing the secret;
  3. revoke or rotate it first;
  4. coordinate history and cache cleanup separately; deleting the current line is not remediation.

PII and user content are not secret-scanning test material. Minimize them, retain them only in their approved private store, and report an opaque ID or redacted aggregate.

Check 1: Test Deletion/Disabling Detection

# Deleted test files
git diff --name-status HEAD~1 | grep "^D.*test_"

# Newly added @pytest.mark.skip / skipIf
git diff HEAD~1 -- "*.py" | grep -E "^\+.*@pytest\.mark\.(skip|skipIf|xfail)"

# Test exclusion patterns (pyproject.toml)
git diff HEAD~1 -- pyproject.toml | grep -E "^\+.*(ignore|exclude|deselect)"

Verdict: Test deletion/disabling without legitimate justification = FAIL

Check 2: Lint/Type Check Bypass Detection

# type: ignore overuse
git diff HEAD~1 -- "*.py" | grep -E "^\+.*# type: ignore"

# noqa overuse
git diff HEAD~1 -- "*.py" | grep -E "^\+.*# noqa"

# Rule disabling in ruff/mypy config
git diff HEAD~1 -- pyproject.toml | grep -E "^\+.*(ignore|exclude|per-file-ignores)"

Verdict: 3+ new type: ignore additions = WARNING, rule disabling = FAIL

Check 3: Coverage Regression Detection

# Coverage threshold lowered in config
git diff HEAD~1 -- pyproject.toml | grep -E "^\+.*(fail_under|min_coverage)"

# Run the selected non-live suite without hiding its exit status.
uv run pytest tests/ -m "not live" -q

Use the coverage command in .github/workflows/ci.yml and the threshold in pyproject.toml (tool.coverage.report.fail_under); plain pytest output does not measure coverage. A failing coverage gate or an unjustified threshold, omit, or test exclusion change is FAIL. Compare coverage on the same scope and review regressions even when the configured threshold still passes.

Check 4: Secret Exposure Detection

# Candidate files only; -l reports paths without echoing matched content.
git grep -IlE '(sk-ant-|sk-proj-|sk-[[:alnum:]_-]{20,}|Bearer[[:space:]]+[[:alnum:]_.-]{20,})' -- ':(glob)**/*.py' || true
git grep -IlE 'token[^=]*=[[:space:]]*[^[:space:]]{20,}' -- ':(glob)**/*.py' || true

# .env file committed
git diff --name-status HEAD~1 | grep -E "^A.*\.env$"

Verdict: candidate path = FAIL until an authorized local review classifies it as revoked/test-only/false-positive without copying the value into output.

Check 5: Dependency Downgrade Detection

# Version changes in pyproject.toml
git diff HEAD~1 -- pyproject.toml | grep -E "^\+.*(version|requires-python)"

# Package version downgrade via uv.lock changes
git diff HEAD~1 -- uv.lock | grep -E "^-.*version" | head -10

Verdict: Dependency downgrade without explicit justification = WARNING

GEODE-Specific Checks

ItemCurrent authorityReview requirement
Testsuv run pytest tests/ -m "not live" and uv run pytest tests/ --collect-onlyExplain removed cases and identify surviving behavior checks; a count decrease alone is not a regression verdict
CLI surfaceuv run geode version plus targeted command testsPreserve the current CLI contract; the retired geode analyze domain fixture is not a runtime gate
Tool/module inventoryuv run python scripts/architecture_baseline.py --checkReview inventory and parity changes; do not regenerate the baseline merely to hide drift
Prompt ratchetverify_prompt_integrity(raise_on_drift=True) in core.llm.promptsPreserve pinned prompt hashes or update them with the reviewed prompt change

Use verification gates for executable checks and the deletion gate before removing code or tests. Inventory counts and source scans discover candidates; they do not establish behavior, authorize deletion, or replace CI.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit agent runtimes and their tests for lifecycle inference, capability overload, context pollution, correlated verification, prompt-only control, false success, dead compatibility paths, test-only seams, and complexity without contribution. Use for whole-repository agent audits, slop or dead-code triage, test contribution reviews, large refactors, tool/context simplification, and cleanup requests that need proof before deleting code or tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Diagnose agent operational failures through default-policy checks, multi-gap analysis, explicit service ownership, request-context lifetime, and degradation-versus-correctness checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Align, run, audit, and publish GEODE benchmark comparisons against Agent-World arXiv 2604.18292v1 across MCP-Mark, BFCL V4, and tau2-bench. Use for Agent-World or AgentWorld comparison requests, cross-suite agent benchmark design, Tau2 comparator/profile diagnosis, paired thin-runtime-versus-GEODE experiments, mean-accuracy@8 replication, or benchmark comparability and artifact reviews.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Auto-search and summarize latest AI/agent papers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Content-addressed baseline-archive epoch partitioning. Partition baseline_archive.jsonl + the self-improving hub's baseline serving by a HASH of the full baseline-production+measurement spec — when the spec (margin_rule, fitness/margin logic version, the 4 roles' model+source, rubric/dim-set, bench, seed-pool identity) changes, the hash changes → a new epoch series (like seed-gen gen-*). Triggered by "baseline epoch", "baseline 아카이빙", "epoch partition", "spec hash", "content-addressed", "margin_rule namespace", "production logic 구분", "baseline 하위 서빙" keywords.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mangowhoiscloud/geode152026년 10월 16일 업데이트

mangowhoiscloud의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고