본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

lesson-learned

Analyze recent code changes via git history and extract software engineering lessons. Use when the user asks 'what is the lesson here?', 'what can I learn from this?', 'engineering takeaway', 'what did I just learn?', 'reflect on this code', or wants to extract principles from recent work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • README.md2.7 KB
  • references/anti-patterns.md2.8 KB
  • references/se-principles.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Lesson Learned

Extract specific, grounded software engineering lessons from actual code changes. Not a lecture -- a mirror. Show the user what their code already demonstrates.

Before You Begin

Load the principles reference first.

  1. Read references/se-principles.md to have the principle catalog available
  2. Optionally read references/anti-patterns.md if you suspect the changes include areas for improvement
  3. Determine the scope of analysis (see Phase 1)

Do not proceed until you've loaded at least se-principles.md.

Phase 1: Determine Scope

Ask the user or infer from context what to analyze.

ScopeGit CommandsWhen to Use
Feature branchgit log main..HEAD --oneline + git diff main...HEADUser is on a non-main branch (default)
Last N commitsgit log --oneline -N + git diff HEAD~N..HEADUser specifies a range, or on main (default N=5)
Specific commitgit show <sha>User references a specific commit
Working changesgit diff + git diff --cachedUser says "what about these changes?" before committing

Default behavior:

  • If on a feature branch: analyze branch commits vs main
  • If on main: analyze the last 5 commits
  • If the user provides a different scope, use that

Phase 2: Gather Changes

  1. Run git log with the determined scope to get the commit list and messages
  2. Run git diff for the full diff of the scope
  3. If the diff is large (>500 lines), use git diff --stat first, then selectively read the top 3-5 most-changed files
  4. Read commit messages carefully -- they contain intent that raw diffs miss
  5. Only read changed files. Do not read the entire repo.

Phase 3: Analyze

Identify the dominant pattern -- the single most instructive thing about these changes.

Look for:

  • Structural decisions -- How was the code organized? Why those boundaries?
  • Trade-offs made -- What was gained vs. sacrificed? (readability vs. performance, DRY vs. clarity, speed vs. correctness)
  • Problems solved -- What was the before/after? What made the "after" better?
  • Missed opportunities -- Where could the code improve? (present gently as "next time, consider...")

Map findings to specific principles from references/se-principles.md. Be specific -- quote actual code, reference actual file names and line changes.

Phase 4: Present the Lesson

Use this template:

## Lesson: [Principle Name]

**What happened in the code:**
[2-3 sentences describing the specific change, referencing files and commits]

**The principle at work:**
[1-2 sentences explaining the SE principle]

**Why it matters:**
[1-2 sentences on the practical consequence -- what would go wrong without this, or what goes right because of it]

**Takeaway for next time:**
[One concrete, actionable sentence the user can apply to future work]

If there is a second lesson worth noting (maximum 2 additional):

---

### Also worth noting: [Principle Name]

**In the code:** [1 sentence]
**The principle:** [1 sentence]
**Takeaway:** [1 sentence]

What NOT to Do

AvoidWhyInstead
Listing every principle that vaguely appliesOverwhelming and genericPick the 1-2 most relevant
Analyzing files that were not changedScope creepStick to the diff
Ignoring commit messagesThey contain intent that diffs missRead them as primary context
Abstract advice disconnected from the codeNot actionableAlways reference specific files/lines
Negative-only feedbackDemoralizingLead with what works, then suggest improvements
More than 3 lessonsDilutes the insightOne well-grounded lesson beats seven vague ones

Conversation Style

  • Reflective, not prescriptive. Use the user's own code as primary evidence.
  • Never say "you should have..." -- instead use "the approach here shows..." or "next time you face this, consider..."
  • If the code is good, say so. Not every lesson is about what went wrong. Recognizing good patterns reinforces them.
  • If the changes are trivial (a single config tweak, a typo fix), say so honestly rather than forcing a lesson. "These changes are straightforward -- no deep lesson here, just good housekeeping."
  • Be specific. Generic advice is worthless. Every claim must point to a concrete code change.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

manu14357/zskills162026년 7월 24일 업데이트

manu14357의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고