본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

financial-unit-economics

Analyze profitability per customer, product, or transaction using acquisition costs, lifetime profit, margins, and payback periods. Compare customer groups and marketing channels to produce reports and recommendations for pricing, spending, and business growth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when evaluating business model viability, analyzing profitability per customer/product/transaction, validating startup metrics (CAC, LTV, payback period), making pricing decisions, assessing scalability, comparing business models, or when user mentions unit economics, CAC/LTV ratio, contribution margin, customer profitability, break-even analysis, or needs to determine if a business can be profitable at scale.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Check profitability before expanding a business
  • Compare profitability across acquisition channels
  • Assess pricing changes against target margins
  • Compare retention and lifetime value by customer group

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md13.5 KB
  • resources/evaluators/rubric_financial_unit_economics.json13.8 KB
  • resources/methodology.md17.2 KB
  • resources/template.md11.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Financial Unit Economics

Table of Contents

Purpose

Financial Unit Economics analyzes the profitability of individual units (customers, products, transactions) to determine if a business model is viable and scalable. This skill guides you through calculating key metrics (CAC, LTV, contribution margin), interpreting ratios, conducting cohort analysis, and making data-driven decisions about pricing, marketing spend, and growth strategy.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Business model validation: Determine if startup/new product can be profitable at scale
  • Pricing decisions: Set prices based on target margins and customer economics
  • Marketing spend: Assess ROI of acquisition channels, optimize CAC
  • Growth strategy: Decide when to scale (raise funding, increase spend) based on unit economics
  • Product roadmap: Prioritize features that improve retention or reduce churn (increase LTV)
  • Investor pitch: Demonstrate business model viability with CAC, LTV, payback metrics
  • Channel optimization: Compare profitability across customer segments or acquisition channels
  • Subscription models: Analyze recurring revenue, churn, cohort retention curves
  • Marketplace economics: Model take rate, supply/demand side economics, liquidity
  • Financial planning: Forecast cash flow, runway, burn rate based on unit economics

Trigger phrases: "unit economics", "CAC/LTV", "customer acquisition cost", "lifetime value", "contribution margin", "payback period", "customer profitability", "break-even", "cohort analysis", "is this business viable?"

What Is It?

Financial Unit Economics is the practice of measuring profitability at the most granular level (per customer, product, or transaction) to understand if revenue from a single unit exceeds the cost to acquire and serve it.

Core components:

  • CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost): Total sales/marketing spend ÷ new customers acquired
  • LTV (Lifetime Value): Revenue from customer over their lifetime minus variable costs
  • Contribution Margin: (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue (as %)
  • LTV/CAC Ratio: Measures return on acquisition investment (target: 3:1 or higher)
  • Payback Period: Months to recover CAC from customer revenue
  • Cohort Analysis: Track metrics over time for customer groups (by acquisition month/channel)

Quick example:

Scenario: SaaS startup, subscription model ($100/month), analyzing unit economics.

Metrics:

  • CAC: $20k marketing spend, 100 new customers → CAC = $200
  • Monthly revenue per customer: $100
  • Variable costs: $20/customer/month (hosting, support)
  • Gross margin: ($100 - $20) / $100 = 80%
  • Monthly churn: 5% → Average lifetime = 1 / 0.05 = 20 months
  • LTV: $100 revenue × 20 months × 80% margin = $1,600
  • LTV/CAC: $1,600 / $200 = 8:1 ✓ (healthy, >3:1)
  • Payback period: $200 CAC ÷ ($100 × 80% margin) = 2.5 months ✓ (good, <12 months)

Interpretation: Strong unit economics. Each customer generates 8× their acquisition cost. Can profitably scale marketing spend. Payback in 2.5 months means fast capital recovery.

Core benefits:

  • Early warning system: Detect unsustainable business models before scaling losses
  • Data-driven growth: Know when unit economics justify increasing spend
  • Channel optimization: Identify which acquisition channels are profitable
  • Pricing power: Quantify impact of price changes on profitability
  • Investor confidence: Demonstrate path to profitability with clear metrics

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Unit Economics Analysis Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define the unit
- [ ] Step 2: Calculate CAC
- [ ] Step 3: Calculate LTV
- [ ] Step 4: Assess contribution margin
- [ ] Step 5: Analyze cohorts
- [ ] Step 6: Interpret and recommend

Step 1: Define the unit

What is your unit of analysis? (Customer, product SKU, transaction, subscription). See resources/template.md.

Step 2: Calculate CAC

Total acquisition costs (sales + marketing) ÷ new units acquired. Break down by channel if applicable. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.

Step 3: Calculate LTV

Revenue over unit lifetime minus variable costs. Use cohort data for retention/churn. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.

Step 4: Assess contribution margin

(Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue. Identify levers to improve margin. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.

Step 5: Analyze cohorts

Track retention, LTV, payback by customer cohort (acquisition month/channel/segment). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.

Step 6: Interpret and recommend

Assess LTV/CAC ratio, payback period, cash efficiency. Make recommendations (pricing, channels, growth). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.

Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_financial_unit_economics.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: SaaS Subscription Model

  • Key metrics: MRR, ARR, churn rate, LTV/CAC, payback period, CAC payback
  • Calculation: LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Churn Rate
  • Benchmarks: LTV/CAC ≥3:1, Payback <12 months, Churn <5% monthly (B2C) or <2% (B2B)
  • Levers: Reduce churn (increase LTV), upsell/cross-sell (increase ARPU), optimize channels (reduce CAC)
  • When: Subscription business, recurring revenue, retention critical

Pattern 2: E-commerce / Transactional

  • Key metrics: AOV (Average Order Value), repeat purchase rate, contribution margin per order, CAC
  • Calculation: LTV = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Customer Lifetime (years)
  • Benchmarks: Contribution margin ≥40%, Repeat purchase rate ≥25%, LTV/CAC ≥2:1
  • Levers: Increase AOV (bundling, upsells), drive repeat purchases (loyalty programs), reduce variable costs
  • When: Transactional business, e-commerce, retail

Pattern 3: Marketplace / Platform

  • Key metrics: Take rate, GMV (Gross Merchandise Value), supply/demand CAC, liquidity
  • Calculation: LTV = GMV per user × Take Rate × Gross Margin % ÷ Churn Rate
  • Benchmarks: Take rate 10-30%, LTV/CAC ≥3:1 for both sides, network effects kicking in
  • Levers: Increase take rate (value-added services), improve matching (increase GMV), balance supply/demand
  • When: Two-sided marketplace, platform business

Pattern 4: Freemium / PLG (Product-Led Growth)

  • Key metrics: Free-to-paid conversion rate, time to convert, paid user LTV, blended CAC
  • Calculation: Blended LTV = (Free users × Conversion % × Paid LTV) - (Free user costs)
  • Benchmarks: Conversion ≥2%, Time to convert <90 days, Paid LTV/CAC ≥4:1
  • Levers: Increase conversion rate (improve product, optimize paywall), reduce time to value, lower CAC via virality
  • When: Product-led growth, freemium model, viral product

Pattern 5: Enterprise / High-Touch Sales

  • Key metrics: CAC (including sales team costs), sales cycle length, NRR (Net Revenue Retention), LTV
  • Calculation: LTV = ACV (Annual Contract Value) × Gross Margin % × Average Customer Lifetime (years)
  • Benchmarks: LTV/CAC ≥3:1, Sales efficiency (ARR added ÷ S&M spend) ≥1.0, NRR ≥110%
  • Levers: Shorten sales cycle, increase ACV (upsell, premium tiers), improve retention (NRR)
  • When: Enterprise sales, high ACV, long sales cycles

Guardrails

Critical requirements:

  1. Fully-loaded CAC: Include all acquisition costs (sales salaries, marketing spend, tools, overhead allocation). Underestimating CAC makes unit economics look better than reality. Common miss: excluding sales team salaries.

  2. True variable costs: Only include costs that scale with each unit (COGS, hosting per user, transaction fees). Don't include fixed costs (rent, core engineering). LTV calculation requires accurate margin.

  3. Cohort-based LTV: Don't average across all customers. Early cohorts ≠ recent cohorts. Track retention curves by cohort (acquisition month/channel). LTV should be based on observed retention, not assumptions.

  4. Time horizon matters: LTV is a prediction. Use conservative assumptions. For new products, LTV estimates are unreliable (insufficient data). Weight recent cohorts more heavily.

  5. Payback period vs. LTV/CAC: Both matter. High LTV/CAC but long payback (>18 months) strains cash. Fast payback (<6 months) allows rapid reinvestment. Optimize for both.

  6. Channel-level analysis: Blended metrics hide truth. CAC and LTV vary by channel (paid search vs. referral vs. content). Analyze separately to optimize spend.

  7. Retention is king: Small changes in churn have exponential impact on LTV. Improving monthly churn from 5% to 4% increases LTV by 25%. Retention improvements > acquisition improvements.

  8. Gross margin floor: Need ≥60% gross margin for SaaS, ≥40% for e-commerce to be viable. Low margin means high LTV/CAC ratio still yields poor cash flow.

Common pitfalls:

  • ❌ Ignoring churn: Assuming customers stay forever. Reality: churn compounds. Use cohort retention curves.
  • ❌ Vanity LTV: Using unrealistic retention (e.g., 5 year LTV with 1 month of data). Stick to observed behavior.
  • ❌ Blended CAC: Mixing profitable and unprofitable channels. Break down by channel, segment, cohort.
  • ❌ Not updating: Unit economics change as product, market, competition evolve. Re-calculate quarterly.
  • ❌ Missing costs: Forgetting support costs, payment processing fees, fraud losses, refunds. Track everything.
  • ❌ Premature scaling: Growing before unit economics work (LTV/CAC <2:1). "We'll make it up in volume" rarely works.

Quick Reference

Key formulas:

CAC = (Sales + Marketing Costs) ÷ New Customers Acquired

LTV (subscription) = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Monthly Churn Rate

LTV (transactional) = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Lifetime (years)

Contribution Margin % = (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue

LTV/CAC Ratio = Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost

Payback Period (months) = CAC ÷ (Monthly Revenue × Gross Margin %)

CAC Payback (months) = S&M Spend ÷ (New ARR × Gross Margin %)

Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue

Customer Lifetime (months) = 1 ÷ Monthly Churn Rate

MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) = Sum of all monthly subscriptions

ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) = MRR × 12

ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Total Revenue ÷ Total Users

NRR (Net Revenue Retention) = (Starting ARR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) ÷ Starting ARR

Benchmarks (varies by stage and industry):

MetricGoodAcceptablePoor
LTV/CAC Ratio≥5:13:1 - 5:1<3:1
Payback Period<6 months6-12 months>18 months
Gross Margin (SaaS)≥80%60-80%<60%
Gross Margin (E-commerce)≥50%40-50%<40%
Monthly Churn (B2C SaaS)<3%3-7%>7%
Monthly Churn (B2B SaaS)<1%1-3%>3%
CAC Payback (SaaS)<12 months12-18 months>18 months
NRR (SaaS)≥120%100-120%<100%

Decision framework:

LTV/CACPaybackRecommendation
<1:1AnyStop: Losing money on every customer. Fix model or pivot.
1:1 - 2:1>12 monthsCaution: Marginal economics. Don't scale yet. Improve retention or reduce CAC.
2:1 - 3:16-12 monthsOptimize: Unit economics acceptable. Focus on improving before scaling.
3:1 - 5:1<12 monthsScale: Good economics. Can profitably invest in growth.
>5:1<6 monthsAggressive scale: Excellent economics. Raise capital, increase spend rapidly.

Inputs required:

  • Revenue data: Pricing, ARPU, AOV, transaction frequency
  • Cost data: Sales/marketing spend, COGS, variable costs per customer
  • Retention data: Churn rate, cohort retention curves, repeat purchase behavior
  • Channel data: CAC by acquisition channel, LTV by segment
  • Time period: Cohort definition (monthly, quarterly), historical data range

Outputs produced:

  • unit-economics-analysis.md: Full analysis with CAC, LTV, ratios, cohort breakdowns
  • cohort-retention-table.csv: Retention curves by cohort
  • channel-profitability.csv: CAC and LTV by acquisition channel
  • recommendations.md: Pricing, channel, growth recommendations based on metrics

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Automate website tasks with agent-browser, a command-line browser tool for AI agents. Fill forms, click controls, extract page text, capture screenshots, and test web apps, with support for saving and reusing login state.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Automating form entry and submission
  • Extracting text from web pages
  • Capturing screenshots and checking web app behavior
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Review Python, FastAPI, and React code for security weaknesses in access checks, input handling, secrets, and dependencies. Produce a report with severity levels, file locations, explanations, and recommended fixes, supported by scanning patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Review pull requests for security weaknesses
  • Audit authentication and access checks
  • Check user input and file handling
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Create a series of personalized sales emails for new prospects or older leads. Get message drafts, subject line alternatives to compare, recommended sending intervals, and ways to include customer results and clear meeting requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Drafting a seven-email sequence for SaaS prospects
  • Comparing subject lines with A/B tests
  • Reconnecting with inactive sales leads
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Plan user communities that support customer acquisition, retention, and expanded use. Develop ambassador programs, user groups, and community content, then assess meaningful participation, customer advocacy, and business impact rather than relying on membership counts alone.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Planning a developer community
  • Designing an ambassador program
  • Creating a user group playbook
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Research competitors’ features, pricing, messaging, and customer complaints to produce comparison tables and an actionable report. Identify underserved needs, clarify how an offering differs, and plan regular monitoring of competitor changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare competitors’ features and pricing
  • Find customer needs competitors overlook
  • Analyze why deals are won or lost
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Plan content using customer questions, keyword data, and competitor coverage. Organize core themes and related articles, match topics to buying stages, and rank ideas by customer impact, product relevance, search potential, and production needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Choose core themes for a business blog
  • Turn customer conversations into content ideas
  • Group keywords into related article topics
MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company3.2천2026년 10월 21일 업데이트

MaxMiksa의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고