본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

seo

Audits and fixes technical SEO, researches search demand, creates content briefs, and measures SEO, AEO and GEO performance. Use when asked to "audit SEO", "fix indexing", "improve AI visibility", "do AEO or GEO", "check keyword volume", "write an SEO brief", or "why did organic traffic drop". For Mintlify Agent Score, AFDocs, or Is Agentic reports use agent-ready. For writing the article use ghostwriter; for visual redesign use ui-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills스타 166(GitHub 166 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구Search Console

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(11)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB
  • evals/evals.json8.8 KB
  • references/answer-engines.md7.8 KB
  • references/audit.md9.1 KB
  • references/brief-template.md2.7 KB
  • references/metadata-copy.md3.2 KB
  • references/monitoring.md6.8 KB
  • references/nextjs-implementation.md6.2 KB
  • references/research-protocol.md4.4 KB
  • references/sources.md5.6 KB
  • references/validation-evidence.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

SEO

  • IS: one entry point for search visibility: evidence-led audits, implementation, demand research, writer briefs, and performance measurement across search engines and AI search (AEO for AI answers inside search, GEO for standalone assistants; see references/answer-engines.md).
  • IS NOT: writing the article or standalone marketing copy (ghostwriter), visual redesign (ui-design), tenant infrastructure (multi-tenant-architecture), or implementing AFDocs / Is Agentic / Is It Agent Ready scorecards (agent-ready). Fix SEO copy and markup when they are part of the requested implementation.

Route the task

RequestLoadDeliverable
Audit a site, diagnose indexing, review a migrationreferences/audit.md and references/validation-evidence.mdPrioritized findings with URLs, observed evidence, impact, and correction
Fix or implement SEOAudit references, then applicable implementation references belowCode changes, scoped checks, and served-page evidence for the changed behavior
Research demand, choose a target, brief a pagereferences/research-protocol.md; references/brief-template.md for a briefSourced demand table and decision, or a durable writer brief
Explain traffic movement, measure AI visibility, monitor SEOreferences/monitoring.mdProperty-scoped diagnosis or configured monitoring with explicit data gaps

For a combined request, reuse one property and URL inventory across modes. An audit request produces findings; a request to fix them proceeds through implementation and verification within the user's authorized scope. A research-only request does not require crawling every URL or changing code.

Establish the evidence boundary

Identify the exact public host, URL-prefix or domain property, production environment, project/subpath, audience, and business outcome. On a shared domain, filter each project's path separately. In analytics, verify hostname, path, conversion event and attribution window before interpreting a number.

Discover connected tools and existing project bindings first. Prefer the established reporting source, then an available equivalent, then a signed-in browser. No vendor is required. Ownership verification, API consent and a successful scoped query are separate states. An export for a neighboring property is not a fallback.

Use No data with its reason for inaccessible, missing, unsupported or unmeasured metrics; distinguish these from a measured zero. Label historical exports by their actual dates. Do useful public checks while an authenticated metric is unavailable.

Working sequence

For substantial mixed work, track only the applicable steps:

  • Confirm property, scope, baseline and intended outcome.
  • Inspect live evidence and map affected route patterns or research questions.
  • Prioritize blocking defects and high-value opportunities; separate observations from hypotheses.
  • Implement authorized corrections or deliver the requested research/brief.
  • Recheck the changed behavior, identify the tested environment, and report remaining gaps.

Prioritize crawl/index defects before cosmetic metadata changes. Page titles, headings and content structure follow the page's purpose and reader intent. Descriptive non-brand terms help category discovery; brand-led portfolio and product pages can be appropriate. Neither a fixed title character count nor question-shaped headings are ranking requirements. A title or description rewrite is a positioning change, not a technical fix: follow references/metadata-copy.md and keep copy out of the technical-fix commits.

For AI visibility, the owner builds crawl access, content and extractable structure; independent reviews, comparisons and coverage are earned, and they supply most of what answers say about a brand. Fix the owned layers first, then say where the remaining leverage sits instead of padding the site. Original evidence, useful comparisons and honest product limitations earn their place ahead of manufactured keyword permutations. Research likely reader questions; do not present invented query fan-outs as engine telemetry or create a page for every variation.

References

FileRead when
references/audit.mdCrawling, diagnosing or prioritizing a site audit; canonicals, redirects, exclusions and programmatic pages; hreflang; CDN, response headers or preview environments affecting discovery
references/nextjs-implementation.mdImplementing App Router metadata, sitemaps, rendering, status codes, Markdown twins, or schema; verify APIs against the installed Next.js docs
references/answer-engines.mdSEO, AEO and GEO terms, AI visibility, crawler policies, owned versus earned coverage, Markdown alternatives or llms.txt
references/metadata-copy.mdWriting or changing page titles, meta descriptions or social titles; deciding whether a metadata edit is mechanical or needs owner sign-off
references/validation-evidence.mdVerifying findings, a built page or a deployed correction
references/research-protocol.mdKeyword/prompt metrics, opportunity selection and question maps
references/brief-template.mdProducing a writer brief
references/monitoring.mdSearch/AI performance, attribution, anomalies or recurring work
references/sources.mdA claim depends on current engine behavior, supported reports, or vendor research

Delivery

Findings go in chat unless a file is requested. Writer briefs go to the requested project destination; retain prior dated briefs when producing a new revision. Keep scratch crawls and exports out of the repository. No em dashes in authored reports or briefs.

Report what changed, why, exact verification evidence, and what remains unmeasured. A successful local build, ready deployment, public URL probe, Google index record and measured conversion are different evidence. Name the strongest state actually verified.

Sending recaps to others, scheduling recurring work, spending on tools and production deployment follow the user's authorization and host rules. Reuse an existing matching monitor rather than creating another owner or schedule.

Gotchas

  • A sitemap can parse while listing /studio that intentionally returns 404. Check its URLs, not just XML validity.
  • A canvas gated on mounted state can leave the homepage and category hubs with only navigation in initial HTML. Inspect those hubs as well as deep pages; use client alone does not imply missing server-rendered content.
  • lastModified: new Date() or a build timestamp describes generation, not necessarily a significant page update. Use content dates or omit the field.
  • A canonical tag on each URL does not resolve two copies that both self-canonicalize. Compare content and choose the preferred URL.
  • Two consistent JSON-LD scripts are not an error. Verify entity identity, eligible properties and visible supporting content instead of script count.
  • DNS verification needs no invented meta token. Confirm scoped data access separately.
  • A crawler user-agent probe does not authenticate a bot IP or establish index inclusion. Treat CDN logs and engine inspection as separate evidence.
  • Prompt demand, measured citations, mentions, AI impressions and referral sessions are different quantities. Preserve engine, source, match type, scope and window.
  • One prompt run, or one score averaged across engines, is not a visibility measurement. Repeat each prompt, report per engine, and keep recall separate from citations.
  • Schema, llms.txt and fixed answer-block lengths are not measured citation levers. Keep them for their real consumers; do not sell them as AI visibility.
  • An audit PR that also rewrote titles on priority and campaign pages was sent back with those rewrites reverted, because the wording was the owner's positioning call. Ship mechanical metadata fixes and list the rest for the owner.
  • A vendor Search Console connector may under-report. Reconcile property, filters and aggregation against native Search Console before diagnosing a drop.

Maintenance only: evals/evals.json holds behavioral scenarios and routing prompts. It is loaded when changing the skill, not during ordinary SEO work.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Implements agent-readiness on public sites and docs from Mintlify Agent Score, AFDocs, Is Agentic, Is It Agent Ready, or url-discovery-bench reports, or from server logs of agents 404ing on guessed URLs. Use when asked to "make our site agent-ready", "improve Agent Score", "fix llms.txt coverage", "agents keep 404ing on our docs", or when a pasted scorecard is the brief.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Creates and improves portable Agent Skills with a validator, routing scenarios, and evidence-based keep, cut, merge, or retire decisions. Use when asked to "write a skill", "update all skills", "audit my SKILL.md", "remove redundant instructions", or fix skill triggering.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

agents-md

무료

Audits and edits agent instruction files, verifies repository commands, and migrates repositories to AGENTS.md as the single shared source. Use when asked to "improve my AGENTS.md", "migrate CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md", or make instructions work across agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Builds and maintains a repo's own verification harness (verify CLI, doctor, worktree isolation, feature map, seed data) and a reproduce-first bug handoff. Use when asked to "build a verification harness", "add a doctor command", "prove every feature still works", or "reproduce this bug report".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

autoship

무료

Runs a changesets npm release through the version PR, CI publish, and registry verification. Use when asked to "release this package", "autoship", "merge Version Packages", or diagnose a release that did not publish.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

ax-audit

무료

Audits agentic products for tool parity, authority, approval payloads, recovery, and trust using 24 rules and a ship verdict. Use when asked for an "AX audit", to review an agent approval flow, or whether an agent can operate the product.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mblode/agent-skills1662026년 10월 26일 업데이트

mblode의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고