본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

bug

Create a structured bug ticket (Given/When/Then scenario, repro steps, severity).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard스타 538(GitHub 538 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구GitHub

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/bug — Create a Bug Report Ticket

Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.

Creates a structured GitHub Issue for a bug with Given/When/Then scenario, repro steps, environment, and severity. Asks guided questions, shows the formatted ticket for confirmation, then creates the issue.

Path resolution

Read the registry path via portfolio_registry, the per-project docs dir via portfolio_projects_dir, and the ideas backlog via portfolio_ideas_backlog — all from .claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh. Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
registry=$(portfolio_registry)

Defaults match today's single-fork layout (./apexyard.projects.yaml, ./projects, ./projects/ideas-backlog.md). Adopters in split-portfolio mode override the portfolio.{registry, projects_dir, ideas_backlog} keys in .claude/project-config.json. Don't hardcode literal apexyard.projects.yaml or projects/ paths in bash blocks — the helper resolves whichever mode the adopter is in. See docs/multi-project.md.

Usage

/bug Profile picture upload fails
/bug RTL resets on navigation
/bug Follow button state not persisted

Process

0. Write the active-issue-skill marker (REQUIRED — me2resh/apexyard#268)

Before any gh issue create (or other tracker CLI), write this skill's name to the active-issue-skill marker so require-skill-for-issue-create.sh lets the command through. At skill entry:

# Ops root through the session pin (docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md).
ops_root=$(p="${APEXYARD_OPS_PIN_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/apexyard}/ops-root-${CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID:-}"; r=""; [ -z "${APEXYARD_OPS_DISABLE_PIN:-}" ] && [ -f "$p" ] && IFS= read -r r < "$p"; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] || { r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ ! -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ]; do r=${r%/*}; done; }; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] && . "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" && resolve_ops_root) && [ -n "$ops_root" ] || { echo "No ops root. See docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md." >&2; exit 1; }
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
echo "bug" > "$skill_marker"

Remove the marker on every exit path (success, early-exit, user cancel, error):

marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
rm -f "$skill_marker"

The clear-issue-skill-marker.sh SessionStart hook clears only the current session's marker, but a clean exit should never leave one behind. See AgDR-0030.

1. Resolve the target repo

Read the active-ticket marker of the working tree you are in to determine which repo we're working in. The marker is the apexyard-ticket file in the git dir of that tree. See /start-ticket "Read the active ticket". If no active ticket, check apexyard.projects.yaml for managed projects. If only one project, use it. If multiple, ask:

Which project is this bug in?

If no projects are registered, ask for the repo in owner/repo format.

2. Parse or ask for the title

Take the title from $ARGUMENTS. If empty, ask:

What's the bug? Give me a short description.

3. Gather details (one question at a time)

Ask conversationally — do NOT batch all questions. Wait for each answer before asking the next.

a) Bug Scenario

Describe the bug scenario:
- Given: what's the starting state?
- When: what action triggers the bug?
- Then: what happens (the broken behavior)?
- Expected: what should happen instead?

If the user gives a casual description, restructure it into Given/When/Then/Expected format and confirm.

b) Repro Steps

What are the exact steps to reproduce?

c) Severity

How severe is this?
1. P0 — blocks a core feature, must fix immediately
2. P1 — important, fix soon
3. P2 — minor, fix when convenient

d) Environment details

Any environment details? (browser, device, staging/prod, or enter TBD if unknown)

e) Investigation Notes (optional)

Any initial investigation? (root cause hypothesis, relevant code paths, or Enter to skip)

4. Resolve the bug body template

Resolve the bug body template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template tickets/bug.md)   # → custom-templates/tickets/bug.md if present, else templates/tickets/bug.md

Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/tickets/bug.md. Adopters who want a customised bug-body shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/tickets/bug.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.

Backward-compat fallback: if portfolio_resolve_template returns empty (template file missing — partial adopter setup), fall back to the inline heredoc body below and print a one-line WARN on stderr (WARN: tickets/bug.md template missing — using inline fallback). This preserves the pre-refactor behaviour for adopters whose installations don't yet have the new template files.

Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md before drafting. Treat the resolved template as the source of truth. Keep required sections, write TBD for unknown required values, remove empty conditional sections, and delete the guidance comment before filing.

5. Show the formatted ticket for confirmation

Substitute the gathered inputs into the resolved template (or the inline heredoc fallback), then display the full ticket using the resolved shape (the default templates/tickets/bug.md shape is reproduced below):

Here's the ticket I'll create:

---
**[{P0|P1|P2}] {title}**

## Bug Scenario
**Given** {precondition}
**When** {action}
**Then** {unexpected result}
**Expected** {correct behavior}

## Repro Steps
1. {step 1}
2. {step 2}
3. ...

## Environment
{environment details or TBD}

## Severity
{P0-critical / P1-important / P2-later}

## Mitigation
{include only when provided}

## Investigation Notes
{include only when provided}

## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---

Labels: bug, {P0|P1|P2}
Repo: {owner/repo}

Create this ticket? (yes / edit / cancel)

6. Handle response

  • yes / looks good / go → create the issue
  • edit / change X → ask what to change, update, re-show
  • cancel / no → abort

7. Create the issue (via the tracker abstraction)

Dispatch through tracker_create (#670 / AgDR-0072) so the issue lands in this project's tracker (GitHub / GitLab / custom) per its tracker: block in apexyard.projects.yaml. For a GitHub adopter this runs gh issue create unchanged.

# Resolve + source the tracker lib (it lives in the ops fork's hooks dir).
tracker_lib="$(r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ "$r" != / ]; do \
  [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh" ] && { echo "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh"; break; }; \
  r="${r%/*}"; done)"
# shellcheck source=/dev/null
. "$tracker_lib"

body_file="$(mktemp)"
cat > "$body_file" <<'BODY'
{formatted body}
BODY

# tracker_create <owner/repo> <title> <body_file> [<labels_csv>] → {"ref","url"}.
# Gated by require-skill-for-issue-create.sh; the step-0 marker keeps it allowed.
result="$(tracker_create "{owner/repo}" "[{P0|P1|P2}] {title}" "$body_file" "bug,{priority}")"
rc=$?
rm -f "$body_file"
if [ "$rc" -eq 3 ]; then
  # tracker.kind=none (shape-only): no tracker to create in. tracker_create
  # printed the rendered ticket body to stdout — surface it for manual /
  # external filing instead of a non-existent CLI/auth failure.
  echo "Tracker is 'none' (shape-only) — nothing was created in a tracker." >&2
  echo "File this in your external system (e.g. Jira/Linear via MCP):" >&2
  printf '%s\n' "$result"
  exit 0
elif [ "$rc" -ne 0 ] || [ -z "$result" ]; then
  echo "Issue creation failed — check the tracker CLI / auth. Nothing was created." >&2
  exit 1
fi

8. Return the result

ref="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.ref')"
url="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.url')"
echo "Created: {owner/repo}#${ref} — {title}"
echo "${url}"

Rules

  1. One question at a time. Never batch questions. Wait for each answer.
  2. Always confirm before creating. Show the full ticket and get explicit "yes".
  3. Given/When/Then is required. Restructure casual descriptions into the format.
  4. At least one repro step. Don't create bugs without repro.
  5. Labels auto-applied. bug always, plus the severity label. Severity label scheme reads from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.label_priority_scheme (default P0,P1,P2,P3).
  6. Title prefix. The accepted prefix list reads from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.prefix_whitelist; [Bug] must be in that list. Some teams prefer [Bug] prefix with the severity as a label (the default); others embed severity in the title ([P0], [P1]). Skill respects whichever is configured. See apexyard#109.

Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

agdr

무료

Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

me2resh의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고