본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

request-apexyard-feature

Request a new feature or enhancement for the apexyard FRAMEWORK itself — files a structured issue upstream to me2resh/apexyard. Distinct from /feature, which files into your own project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard스타 538(GitHub 538 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구GitHub

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

/request-apexyard-feature — Request a Framework Feature Upstream

Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md. Use the controlled technical writing profile for the upstream feature request: state the outcome and reason before detail.

Files a structured GitHub Issue proposing a feature or enhancement for the apexyard framework itself to the canonical upstream me2resh/apexyard — for a new skill, a new hook, a rule improvement, a better workflow, etc.

This is the framework-feedback sibling of /feature. The difference is the target:

SkillRequests a feature for…Files to…
/featureyour managed projectyour project's own GitHub repo
/request-apexyard-featurethe apexyard framework (skills / hooks / rules / agents / workflows)me2resh/apexyard (upstream)

Leak protection (mandatory). This skill writes to a PUBLIC framework repo. NEVER include a registered private project's name, repo slug, or workspace path. Per .claude/rules/leak-protection.md, describe the motivating context generically ("while onboarding a project", "during bulk ticket filing"). The block-private-refs-in-public-repos.sh hook is the backstop; scrub at authoring time.

Usage

/request-apexyard-feature a /reindex skill for manual MCP reindexing
/request-apexyard-feature let /handover pick which docs to generate
/request-apexyard-feature a hook that warns on stale review markers

Process

0. Write the active-issue-skill marker (REQUIRED — me2resh/apexyard#268)

# Ops root through the session pin (docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md).
ops_root=$(p="${APEXYARD_OPS_PIN_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/apexyard}/ops-root-${CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID:-}"; r=""; [ -z "${APEXYARD_OPS_DISABLE_PIN:-}" ] && [ -f "$p" ] && IFS= read -r r < "$p"; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] || { r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ ! -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ]; do r=${r%/*}; done; }; [ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" ] && . "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-ops-root.sh" && resolve_ops_root) && [ -n "$ops_root" ] || { echo "No ops root. See docs/skills/shared/ops-root.md." >&2; exit 1; }
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
echo "request-apexyard-feature" > "$skill_marker"

Remove the marker on every exit path (success, cancel, error):

marker_home="$ops_root"
. "$marker_home/.claude/hooks/_lib-session-markers.sh"
skill_marker=$(active_issue_skill_marker_path "$marker_home") || { echo "A session id is required. Restart through the harness adapter." >&2; exit 2; }
rm -f "$skill_marker"

1. Resolve the upstream repo

Always files upstream, regardless of the adopter's fork origin:

UPSTREAM=$(git remote get-url upstream 2>/dev/null \
  | sed -E 's#(git@github.com:|https://github.com/)##; s#\.git$##')
UPSTREAM="${UPSTREAM:-me2resh/apexyard}"

If $UPSTREAM doesn't resolve to me2resh/apexyard, confirm with the user or default to the canonical slug before filing.

2. Capture the framework version

Do NOT use git describe --tags --abbrev=0. Under the release-cut branch model, release tags (vX.Y.Z) are created on main and are NOT ancestors of dev, so git describe from a dev checkout reports a stale version (observed: v1.1.0 when the line is actually v2.2.0) — every issue filed from dev would be mislabeled (#503). Derive from CHANGELOG.md instead, which /release-sync carries main → dev, so it is always current on dev:

# Primary: top-most `## [X.Y.Z]` heading in CHANGELOG.md (carried main→dev by
# /release-sync, so always the canonical current version on dev).
FW_VERSION=$(grep -m1 -oE '^## \[v?[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' "$ops_root/CHANGELOG.md" 2>/dev/null \
  | grep -oE '[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+')
if [ -n "$FW_VERSION" ]; then
  FW_VERSION="v$FW_VERSION"          # keep the `v` prefix the field renders today
else
  # Fallbacks: highest semver tag across ALL refs (catches main-only release
  # tags via -v:refname sort) → short HEAD → literal "unknown".
  FW_VERSION=$(git -C "$ops_root" tag --sort=-v:refname 2>/dev/null | head -1)
  [ -z "$FW_VERSION" ] && FW_VERSION=$(git -C "$ops_root" rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null)
  [ -z "$FW_VERSION" ] && FW_VERSION="unknown"
fi

3. Gather details (one question at a time)

Ask conversationally — do NOT batch. Wait for each answer.

a) The problem / friction — what's awkward or missing in the framework today? (the why, not the solution)

b) Proposed behaviour — what should the framework do? (new skill / hook / rule / agent / workflow change — name it concretely)

c) Why it helps adopters — who benefits and how; what they do instead today.

d) Scope hint (optional) — anything explicitly out of scope, or a rough size.

e) Related (optional) — existing skills/hooks it touches, related issue numbers.

4. Show the formatted issue for confirmation

Substitute into this body and display for yes / edit / cancel. Re-scan for any private project name before showing it.

Here's the framework feature request I'll file to <UPSTREAM>:

---
**[Feature] {title}**

## Problem
{the friction / gap in the framework today}

## Proposed behaviour
{what the framework should do — new skill / hook / rule / agent / workflow}

## Why it helps adopters
{who benefits + how; what they do today instead}

## Scope / out of scope
{scope hint or "—"}

## Framework version
{FW_VERSION}

## Related
{touched skills/hooks + related issues, or "—"}

## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---

Labels: enhancement
Repo: <UPSTREAM>

File this upstream? (yes / edit / cancel)

5. Handle response

  • yes → create the issue
  • edit / change X → update, re-show
  • cancel / no → abort (and remove the marker)

6. Create the GitHub Issue

gh issue create --repo "$UPSTREAM" \
  --title "[Feature] {title}" \
  --label "enhancement" \
  --body "{formatted body}"

If the enhancement label doesn't exist upstream, drop --label and note it.

7. Return the URL

Filed upstream: <UPSTREAM>#{number} — {title}
{url}

Rules

  1. One question at a time. Never batch. Wait for each answer.
  2. Always confirm before filing. Show the full issue, get explicit "yes".
  3. Scrub private project names — this writes to a PUBLIC repo. See .claude/rules/leak-protection.md. Use the <!-- private-refs: allow --> marker ONLY on explicit user confirmation.
  4. Always file upstream — me2resh/apexyard.
  5. Lead with the problem, not the solution — the "why" makes a feature request actionable.
  6. Label enhancement. Title prefix [Feature].

Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

agdr

무료

Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

me2resh/apexyard5382026년 10월 26일 업데이트

me2resh의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고