Score and compare covariance estimates with precise's assessor panel. Use when you need to judge an estimate out-of-sample or rank competing estimators — and especially in high dimensions, where the plain held-out likelihood is misleading.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
from precise import all_assessors, assessor_from_name
for A in all_assessors():
s = A().score(cov, X_test=X_test, true_cov=Sigma_true) # higher = better
cov is the estimate to judge; X_test is held-out data (rows = observations); true_cov is the
population covariance (only available in simulation).needs_data and needs_truth; pass what it needs. Truth-free assessors work on
real data, truth-requiring ones (e.g. FrobeniusToTruth) only in simulation.Do not rank estimators by the held-out Gaussian log-likelihood when p is comparable to n. The
likelihood is dominated by the smallest, unidentifiable eigenvalues of the estimate; empirically it ranks
estimators below chance in that regime. Instead use inversion-free or block judges:
| Regime / goal | Use |
|---|---|
| low dimension, well-conditioned | LogLikelihood (it is optimal here) |
high dimension (p/n near 1 or larger) | BlockPseudoLikelihood, SchurLikelihood, VariogramScore, FrobeniusToTruth (sim only) |
| economic / portfolio relevance | GMVVariance (out-of-sample minimum-variance variance) |
| forecasting a variance from a noisy proxy | a QLIKE / Bregman-consistent loss, not RMSE on the proxy — RMSE on a noisy variance proxy can rank inconsistently |
SchurLikelihood(gamma=...) is a tunable bridge: gamma=1 is the full likelihood (fragile in high-d),
gamma=0 the robust block-diagonal one, interior values better-conditioned than either.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Rigorously and honestly assess a NEW or proposed covariance / correlation / precision estimator, or a new covariance scoring rule, using precise. Use when someone proposes, asks to evaluate, or wants to compare a covariance methodology. Covers implementing it to the contract, conformance, benchmarking against the registry, out-of-sample validation, and statistically defensible inference.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pick which precise covariance estimator to use for a given dataset. Use when you have data X and are unsure which estimator fits its dimension, conditioning, or tail behavior. Wraps precise.suggest() and covariance_features().
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Estimate a covariance / correlation / precision matrix incrementally with precise. Use when data arrives as a stream and you want the matrix updated per observation, or when you want an online (partial_fit) drop-in for sklearn.covariance, which is batch-only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Maintain an online covariance over named series whose set changes over time (e.g. assets entering and leaving). Use when observations arrive as dicts keyed by name rather than fixed-length vectors. Wraps precise's keyed / FixedUniverse / DynamicUniverse adapters.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Online (incremental) covariance, correlation, and precision estimation in Python — the streaming complement to sklearn.covariance. Use when code needs a covariance/correlation matrix updated per observation, recomputes np.cov/np.corrcoef in a rolling loop, must judge or compare covariance estimates, or proposes a new covariance methodology. Points to task-specific skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.