본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

docs-corpus-audit

Use this skill to run a holistic regrounding pass on the entire microsoft/apm documentation corpus against current source code, page-by-page, and emit surgical fixes for stale claims. Activate when the maintainer wants a WHOLE-CORPUS audit (not per-PR review) -- typical triggers include "audit the docs", "reground the corpus", "check every page against code", "pre-release docs sweep", "the docs have drifted everywhere", or "we just reshaped the TOC, find dead links". Wave-batched and S7-verified; scales to the full ~112-page corpus in ~10 minutes wall-time. This is a SIBLING to docs-sync, not a replacement: docs-sync is per-PR (triggered by a diff); this skill is per-corpus (triggered by a maintainer ask). They share agent personas, schemas, and the docs index, but their triggers MUST NOT collide. Does NOT auto-merge, does NOT push without maintainer review, and does NOT replace per-PR drift detection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(7)

  • SKILL.md10.0 KB
  • assets/panelist-return-schema.json2.1 KB
  • assets/subagent-prompt-template.md2.8 KB
  • evals/content-evals.json3.1 KB
  • evals/README.md1.1 KB
  • evals/trigger-evals.json2.3 KB
  • scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh3.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

docs-corpus-audit -- whole-corpus regrounding pass

The docs corpus drifts silently between releases. docs-sync catches drift introduced by individual PRs at PR-open time. This skill catches the accumulated drift that slips past per-PR review -- stale flag names, dead nav links from past IA reshuffles, deprecation banners that outlived their version targets, factual claims whose source-side truth has moved.

The pattern is A1 PANEL + WAVE EXECUTION + S7 DETERMINISTIC TOOL BRIDGE + A8 ALIGNMENT LOOP + A9 SUPERVISED EXECUTION. The corpus is split into disjoint page scopes; one verifier subagent owns each scope; agents extract factual claims, S7-verify against source, apply surgical fixes inline. The orchestrator then runs an alignment-loop pass to re-verify that applied edits actually ground out true.

This skill is ADVISORY but ACTIONABLE: agents apply edits inline on a working branch. The orchestrator is the sole writer to git -- stages, commits, pushes. Maintainer reviews the resulting PR.

Sibling contract with docs-sync

These two skills share substrate. Be explicit:

Shared resourceOwnerBoth use
.apm/docs-index.yml (corpus map)docs-syncyes
doc-writer personasharedyes (per-page edits)
python-architect personasharedyes (S7 verification)
editorial-owner personasharedoptional (voice pass at scale)
cdo personasharedyes (final synthesis)
assets/panelist-return-schema.jsondocs-sync (mirrored)yes

Trigger boundary (avoid DISPATCH COLLISION):

  • docs-sync triggers on a PR event ("PR opened/synchronized", source-diff-driven).
  • docs-corpus-audit triggers on a maintainer ask for a WHOLE-CORPUS pass ("audit the corpus", "reground", "pre-release sweep") -- no PR required, no diff required, the whole corpus is the input.

If a maintainer asks "review this PR's doc impact", route to docs-sync. If they ask "audit all our docs" or "the docs feel stale everywhere", route here.

Architecture invariants

  • Wave-batched, not flat. Pages are partitioned into 6-8 disjoint scopes; each scope is one verifier subagent. Cost scales with wave size, not corpus size. A wave of 6 agents on ~10 pages each is the canonical shape.
  • Disjoint page ownership. Each subagent has EDIT AUTHORITY on its scope only. No two agents touch the same file -- guarantees no merge conflicts during fan-in.
  • S7 verification is mandatory. Every factual claim is verified against deterministic source: uv run apm <verb> --help for CLI, grep -n src/apm_cli/ for symbols, python -c "import ..." for module shape, file-existence checks for nav links. Never assert from LLM recall.
  • Surgical edits only. 1-3 line patches per drift, preserving voice. Restructuring is deferred to the orchestrator post-pass, never auto-applied by per-scope agents.
  • Single-writer interlock for git. Subagents NEVER run git commit, git push, or gh pr <write>. Orchestrator commits per wave; pushes once per session.
  • Alignment loop (A8). After waves return, orchestrator re-greps the corpus for the patterns the agents claimed to fix. Any residue triggers a targeted re-dispatch (max 2 redrafts) or is escalated to maintainer.

Roster (composition, not invention)

Reuse docs-sync's personas. Do NOT invent a one-off "grounding- verifier" role; that's R3 EXTRACT in reverse.

RolePersonaAlways active?
Per-scope verifier+editorpython-architect (S7) and doc-writer (edits), bundled into one subagent prompt per scopeYes -- one per page scope, parallel fan-out
Cross-corpus post-passorchestrator (deterministic greps via scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh)Yes -- once after waves return
Alignment-loop checkerorchestrator (deterministic re-grep + targeted re-dispatch)Yes -- once after post-pass
Voice pass (optional)editorial-ownerOnly when >20 edits to keep tone coherent
Final synthesiscdoOnce, for the PR summary comment

The per-scope subagent prompt that composes python-architect + doc-writer is in assets/subagent-prompt-template.md -- the orchestrator substitutes scope + working dir + branch and dispatches via the task tool.

Process

1. PROBE (A9 SUPERVISED EXECUTION)
   - Check working tree: docs/src/content/docs/ exists?
   - Check working tree: packages/apm-guide/.apm/skills/apm-usage/
     exists? (Rule-4 backfill target. If missing, the audit cannot
     close Rule 4; ask maintainer before continuing.)
   - Check `.apm/docs-index.yml` reachable.
   - Verify on a working branch (not main).

2. RISK-TRIAGE (orchestrator, ~1 LLM call)
   - Read .apm/docs-index.yml only (NOT the corpus body).
   - Bucket pages by drift risk: HIGH (CLI ref, schemas, consumer
     flows), MEDIUM (producer, enterprise policy), LOW (concepts,
     contributing, troubleshooting, integrations).
   - Decide wave order: HIGH first, MEDIUM next, LOW last.

3. WAVE-PLANNER (orchestrator, deterministic)
   - Partition pages into 6-8 disjoint scopes per wave.
   - Each agent gets ~9 pages, mixed surface types.

4. WAVE EXECUTION (parallel, one subagent per scope)
   - Orchestrator dispatches one task per scope using the prompt
     template in assets/subagent-prompt-template.md.
   - Subagents read pages, extract claims, S7-verify, apply
     surgical edits, return JSON per the docs-sync panelist
     schema (mirrored at assets/panelist-return-schema.json).
   - Validate every return against the schema; reject malformed
     JSON.

5. CROSS-CORPUS POST-PASS (orchestrator, deterministic)
   - Run scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh to grep for patterns
     a per-scope agent cannot see (IA-reshuffle dead links, stale
     deprecation version targets, phantom flag references).
   - Patch residue inline.

6. ALIGNMENT LOOP (orchestrator, deterministic)
   - Re-run scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh.
   - Re-grep for claims the agents marked DRIFTED-FIXED.
   - If residue: targeted re-dispatch to the owning agent
     (bounded: max 2 redrafts per wave).

7. COMMIT + PUSH (orchestrator, single writer)
   - One commit per wave; structured message naming closed items.
   - Push to working branch.

8. PR + SUMMARY COMMENT (orchestrator)
   - If no PR exists: open one with the [pr-description-skill]
     (../pr-description-skill/SKILL.md).
   - Post per-wave summary comment: pages audited, drift caught,
     fixes applied, items deferred, alignment-loop residue.

Bundled assets

  • assets/subagent-prompt-template.md -- the per-scope prompt the orchestrator substitutes and dispatches. Composes python-architect (S7) + doc-writer (surgical edit). Loaded once per scope.
  • assets/panelist-return-schema.json -- subagent return schema, mirrored from docs-sync. Loaded once at wave start; validated against every return.
  • scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh -- deterministic grep sweep for cross-corpus patterns (IA dead links, stale deprecation targets, phantom flags). Non-interactive; emits structured matches on stdout, diagnostics on stderr. Run --help for pattern list. Update this script after each major IA reshuffle.

Cost model

Wave sizePagesSubagentsLLM dispatchesWall time
Small~304~5~3 min
Medium (default)~556~7~5 min
Large~110 (full corpus)12 (two medium waves)~14~10 min

Compared to docs-sync (15-call flat ceiling), this skill scales as O(waves), not O(claims), because per-agent work fits in one context window. S7 verification dominates wall-time, not LLM cost.

Boundary (what this skill does NOT do)

  • Per-PR doc-impact review -- use docs-sync.
  • Single-page typo or copy edit -- direct edit is faster.
  • Writing docs for a brand-new feature -- use docs-impact-architect and doc-writer directly.
  • Auto-merging or pushing without maintainer review.
  • Reviewing code quality, security, or test coverage (out of scope).

Evals

See evals/:

  • evals/content-evals.json -- 3 corpus snapshots with seeded drift (stale CLI flag, dead nav link, expired deprecation target); expected behavior is that the skill catches all three and applies surgical fixes that ground out true on re-verification.
  • evals/trigger-evals.json -- 10 should-trigger + 10 should-NOT- trigger queries, 60/40 train/val. The val split is the ship gate (>=0.5 should-trigger AND <0.5 should-not-trigger).
  • evals/README.md -- how to run.

Provenance

This skill was extracted from a real session that audited the microsoft/apm corpus across 3 waves (PR #1511, 2026-05-27): 112/112 pages audited, 49 surgical fixes, ~25 LLM dispatches, ~30 min wall-time. The session design artifact (genesis hand-off packet) lives in session state, not in this bundle (maintainer- scope, not runtime-loaded).

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

apm-usage

무료

Activate when the user asks about APM (Agent Package Manager): installing, configuring, authoring, or troubleshooting AI-agent packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, policy, or any `apm` CLI command.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

auth

무료

Activate when code touches token management, credential resolution, git auth flows, GITHUB_APM_PAT, ADO_APM_PAT, AuthResolver, HostInfo, AuthContext, or any remote host authentication -- even if 'auth' isn't mentioned explicitly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Use this skill to post or patch ONE GitHub comment for a microsoft/apm autopilot run. It owns public vs debug body assembly and the AI disclaimer footer. Never labels, assigns, requests reviewers, or merges. Autopilot skills that write comments must load this skill and must not call gh comment APIs themselves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Use this skill to queue maintainer-accepted microsoft/apm issues (`status/accepted`) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-issue-delivery-worker sessions. Any accepted type is eligible. Advisory `triage/recommended` is not authorization. Does not triage. Does not review PRs. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/apm4천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

microsoft의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고