본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

analysis-authoring

Authoring conventions for exploratory data analysis notebooks and analytical dashboards, covering section sequence, visualization selection, scale thresholds, caching and state, and dashboard validation budgets. Use when composing or reviewing an EDA notebook, an analytical dashboard, or a dashboard test pass.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB
  • references/dashboard-authoring-and-validation.md5.3 KB
  • references/eda-notebook-authoring.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Analysis Authoring Conventions

Goal

Produce exploratory notebooks and analytical dashboards whose structure, visualization choices, and scale handling are deliberate rather than incidental. This skill supplies the editorial judgment that generic file, notebook, terminal, and browser tooling does not carry.

Flow

  1. Confirm the analysis question, the datasets in scope, and the deliverable shape: notebook, dashboard, or both.
  2. Read the available profile and objectives artifacts rather than re-deriving column semantics. data-catalog owns the profile contract and semantic roles.
  3. Select the deliverable's section sequence from the matching reference, including only the conditional sections the data supports.
  4. Choose each visualization from its analytical goal, applying the scale thresholds rather than plotting whole datasets by default.
  5. Record interpretation next to each figure so a reader learns what the figure answers, not only what it shows.
  6. Validate the deliverable against its completeness expectations, and for dashboards apply the responsiveness budgets as project-adjustable defaults.

Inputs

  • The analysis question and intended audience
  • Dataset locations and, when available, an existing data profile and declared objectives
  • The deliverable shape and its destination
  • Any project-specific performance budget that overrides the defaults here

Success criteria

  • The deliverable follows the section sequence for its shape, and conditional sections appear only when the data supports them.
  • Every figure is preceded by the question it answers and is followed by an interpretation placeholder or an actual reading.
  • Visualization selection matches the analytical goal, and dense or high-cardinality data is sampled, binned, or truncated deliberately.
  • Every meaningful distinction is encoded in a channel besides colour, and categorical and continuous scales use colourblind-safe palettes.
  • Notebook code stays modular, with repeated transformation logic extracted rather than duplicated across cells.
  • Dashboard caching distinguishes serializable data from global resources, and cross-page interaction state is explicit.
  • Dashboard validation reports functional, data, and responsiveness findings against stated budgets.
  • Uncertainty, data limitations, and open questions are written down rather than implied.

Constraints

  • Describe judgment, not tool mechanics. Notebook creation, cell execution, output inspection, browser navigation, and screenshots are native tool capabilities and are not narrated here.
  • Reference profile and objectives artifacts instead of copying their contents into the deliverable.
  • Keep persistence format and dataset versioning with dataops, which owns pipeline invariants and storage conventions.
  • Keep entity semantics, relationships, and semantic roles with data-catalog.
  • Treat the performance budgets as defaults. A project-stated budget supersedes them.
  • Do not embed environment-specific absolute paths in a deliverable.

Ownership boundaries

ConcernOwner
Column semantics, semantic roles, profile and objectives contractsdata-catalog
Persistence format, dataset versioning, pipeline and validation placementdataops
Accessibility conformance criteria and assistive-technology reviewaccessibility
Evaluation dataset design for AI systemsevaluation-design
Trained-model evaluation, tracking, and readinessml-experimentation

Stop rules

  • Stop and ask when the analysis question is unstated, because section selection and visualization choice both depend on it.
  • Stop and record a limitation rather than inventing an explanation for a pattern the data does not support.
  • Stop and route to data-catalog when column meaning, grain, or relationships are ambiguous.
  • Stop and route accessibility conformance work to the accessibility skill rather than restating criteria here.

Package resources

ResourceUse
eda-notebook-authoring.mdRead when composing or reviewing an exploratory notebook
dashboard-authoring-and-validation.mdRead when composing, reviewing, or validating an analytical dashboard

Attribution

This package is repository-original content licensed CC BY 4.0. The section sequences, selection thresholds, completeness expectations, and default budgets are HVE Core conventions rather than reproductions of an upstream specification.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Build, refresh, report, or probe an accessibility coverage matrix across criteria, surfaces, and evidence methods. Use when assessing coverage with the accessibility runtime harness and generated evidence bundle.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Authoring skill for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) supporting capture, from-planner-handoff, and adopt-template entry modes with selectable Y-Statement or MADR v4.0.0 output templates, supersession lineage, and ASR trigger evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Architecture diagram authoring for cloud infrastructure and declared data catalogs. Use when rendering Azure IaC or DS_CATALOG_V1 relationships as caller-selected ASCII or Mermaid diagrams.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create a durable Architecture Review Record from a confirmed System Architecture Reviewer scope, evidence, pillar analysis, trade-offs, and dispositions

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Mutating backlog execution for Azure DevOps, GitHub, and Jira. Use to create one item or apply a reviewed handoff to a confirmed tracker.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/hve-core1.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

microsoft의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고