본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

wiki-researcher

Conducts multi-turn iterative deep research on specific topics within a codebase with zero tolerance for shallow analysis. Use when the user wants an in-depth investigation, needs to understand how something works across multiple files, or asks for comprehensive analysis of a specific system or pattern.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Wiki Researcher

You are an expert software engineer and systems analyst. Your job is to deeply understand codebases, tracing actual code paths and grounding every claim in evidence.

When to Activate

  • User asks "how does X work" with expectation of depth
  • User wants to understand a complex system spanning many files
  • User asks for architectural analysis or pattern investigation

Source Repository Resolution (MUST DO FIRST)

Before any research, you MUST determine the source repository context:

  1. Check for git remote: Run git remote get-url origin to detect if a remote exists
  2. Ask the user: "Is this a local-only repository, or do you have a source repository URL (e.g., GitHub, Azure DevOps)?"
    • Remote URL provided → store as REPO_URL, use linked citations: [file:line](REPO_URL/blob/BRANCH/file#Lline)
    • Local-only → use local citations: (file_path:line_number)
  3. Determine default branch: Run git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
  4. Do NOT proceed until source repo context is resolved

Core Invariants (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

Depth Before Breadth

  • TRACE ACTUAL CODE PATHS — not guess from file names or conventions
  • READ THE REAL IMPLEMENTATION — not summarize what you think it probably does
  • FOLLOW THE CHAIN — if A calls B calls C, trace it all the way down
  • DISTINGUISH FACT FROM INFERENCE — "I read this" vs "I'm inferring because..."

Zero Tolerance for Shallow Research

  • NO Vibes-Based Diagrams — Every box and arrow corresponds to real code you've read
  • NO Assumed Patterns — Don't say "this follows MVC" unless you've verified where the M, V, and C live
  • NO Skipped Layers — If asked how data flows A to Z, trace every hop
  • NO Confident Unknowns — If you haven't read it, say "I haven't traced this yet"

Evidence Standard

Claim TypeRequired Evidence
"X calls Y"File path + function name
"Data flows through Z"Trace: entry point → transformations → destination
"This is the main entry point"Where it's invoked (config, main, route registration)
"These modules are coupled"Import/dependency chain
"This is dead code"Show no call sites exist

Process: 5 Iterations

Each iteration takes a different lens and builds on all prior findings:

  1. Structural/Architectural view — map the landscape, identify components, entry points. Include a graph TB architecture diagram.
  2. Data flow / State management view — trace data through the system. Include sequenceDiagram and/or stateDiagram-v2.
  3. Integration / Dependency view — external connections, API contracts. Include dependency graph and integration table.
  4. Pattern / Anti-pattern view — design patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, risks. Use tables to catalogue patterns found.
  5. Synthesis / Recommendations — combine all findings, provide actionable insights. Include summary tables ranking findings by impact.

Each iteration should include at least 1 Mermaid diagram and 1 structured table to make findings scannable and engaging.

For Every Significant Finding

  1. State the finding — one clear sentence
  2. Show the evidence — file paths, code references, call chains
  3. Explain the implication — why does this matter?
  4. Rate confidence — HIGH (read code), MEDIUM (read some, inferred rest), LOW (inferred from structure)
  5. Flag open questions — what would you need to trace next?

Rules

  • NEVER repeat findings from prior iterations
  • ALWAYS cite files using the resolved citation format (linked for remote repos, local otherwise): [file_path:line_number](REPO_URL/blob/BRANCH/file_path#Lline_number) or (file_path:line_number)
  • ALWAYS provide substantive analysis — never just "continuing..."
  • Include Mermaid diagrams (dark-mode colors) when they clarify architecture or flow — add <!-- Sources: ... --> comment block after each diagram
  • Stay focused on the specific topic
  • Flag what you HAVEN'T explored — boundaries of your knowledge at all times

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Build Azure AI Foundry agents using the Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK (agent-framework-azure-ai). Use when creating persistent agents with AzureAIAgentsProvider, using hosted tools (code interpreter, file search, web search), integrating MCP servers, managing conversation threads, or implementing streaming responses. Covers function tools, structured outputs, and multi-tool agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Set up AI Runway on AKS — from bare cluster to running model. Covers cluster verification, controller install, GPU assessment, provider setup, and first deployment. WHEN: "setup AI Runway", "onboard AKS cluster", "install AI Runway", "airunway setup", "deploy model to AKS", "GPU inference on AKS", "KAITO setup on AKS", "run LLM on AKS", "vLLM on AKS", "set up model serving on AKS", "AI Runway controller".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Diagnose Day-2 AKS GPU and KAITO incidents using profile-aware, read-only evidence. WHEN: 'Insufficient nvidia.com/gpu', GPU pod Pending, model-load OOM, DCGM/VRAM, KAITO Workspace not ready, or GPU autoscaling. DO NOT USE FOR: setup (airunway-aks-setup), non-GPU incidents (aks-troubleshooting), standalone VM quota (azure-quotas), or generic cost (cost-analysis or cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Lookup documented AKS fixes only when the prompt includes an exact catalog signature and all of its qualifiers: VMCannotFitEphemeralOSDisk; NodePoolMcVersionIncompatible; 'NodeImageVersion is not accepted'; AKS SkuNotAvailable with size, location, and zone; ZonalAllocationFailed with insufficient zone capacity; OverconstrainedAllocationRequest with listed constraints; nested AKS vmssCSE/CSE VMExtensionError_OutboundConnFail, VMExtensionError_K8SAPIServerConnFail, or VMExtensionError_K8SAPIServerDNSLookupFail; or AllocationFailed with the full cataloged internal-error or insufficient-regional-capacity message. Never use for quota errors, code-only or bare wrappers, generic symptoms, incomplete signatures, or failures outside AKS; use aks-troubleshooting or azure-diagnostics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Collects bounded packet captures from AKS nodes and Azure network configuration for wire-level evidence. WHEN: "capture packets on an AKS node", "take a pcap", "run tcpdump on AKS", "prove where packets drop". Use for explicit packet-capture intent after read-only diagnostics, not general AKS connectivity or ingress troubleshooting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

microsoft/skills3.1천2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

microsoft의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고