본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

AI Readiness Assessment

Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB
  • README.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AI Readiness Assessment

Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.

When to Use

  • Before investing in AI/automation tools
  • Board or leadership requesting AI strategy
  • Evaluating build vs buy decisions
  • Annual technology planning

How It Works

Score each dimension 1-5 (1=not started, 5=optimized):

1. Data Infrastructure (Weight: 3x)

  • Centralized data warehouse or lakehouse operational
  • Data quality monitoring automated (freshness, completeness, accuracy)
  • API-first architecture for core systems
  • Data governance policy documented and enforced
  • PII/PHI classification and access controls active

Score 1: Spreadsheets and siloed databases Score 3: Warehouse exists, some pipelines automated Score 5: Real-time streaming, quality >99%, full lineage

2. Process Documentation (Weight: 2x)

  • Top 20 revenue-impacting processes mapped end-to-end
  • Decision trees documented for each process
  • Exception handling paths defined
  • Time-per-task benchmarks established
  • Process owners assigned

Score 1: Tribal knowledge, nothing written down Score 3: Major processes documented, some outdated Score 5: Living documentation, updated quarterly, covers 80%+ of operations

3. Technical Talent (Weight: 2x)

  • At least 1 person understands ML/AI concepts at implementation level
  • Engineering team comfortable with APIs and integrations
  • DevOps/infrastructure person can deploy and monitor services
  • Data analyst can query and interpret model outputs
  • Security team understands AI-specific attack surfaces

Score 1: No technical staff beyond basic IT Score 3: Good engineering team, AI knowledge is theoretical Score 5: Dedicated AI/ML engineer, cross-functional AI literacy program

4. Budget & ROI Framework (Weight: 2x)

  • AI budget allocated (not pulled from "innovation" slush fund)
  • ROI measurement criteria defined before project starts
  • Kill criteria established (when to stop a failing project)
  • Total cost of ownership model includes maintenance, retraining, monitoring
  • Benchmarks set against current manual process costs

Budget Reality by Company Size:

Company SizeYear 1 InvestmentExpected ROI Timeline
15-50 employees$24K-$80K4-8 months
50-200 employees$80K-$300K3-6 months
200-1000 employees$300K-$1.2M6-12 months
1000+ employees$1.2M-$5M+8-18 months

5. Change Management (Weight: 1.5x)

  • Executive sponsor identified and actively involved
  • Communication plan for affected teams drafted
  • Training budget allocated
  • Pilot team identified (volunteers, not voluntolds)
  • Success metrics shared openly with organization

Score 1: Leadership says "just do AI" with no plan Score 3: Exec sponsor exists, some team buy-in Score 5: Change management playbook active, regular town halls, feedback loops

6. Security & Compliance (Weight: 2.5x)

  • AI-specific data handling policy written
  • Vendor security assessment process includes AI criteria
  • Model output logging and audit trail planned
  • Regulatory requirements mapped (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, SOC 2, EU AI Act)
  • Incident response plan covers AI failures

Score 1: No AI-specific security considerations Score 3: General security strong, AI gaps identified Score 5: AI governance framework active, regular audits, compliance automated

7. Integration Readiness (Weight: 1.5x)

  • Core systems have APIs (CRM, ERP, HRIS, etc.)
  • Authentication/authorization supports service accounts
  • Webhook or event-driven architecture available
  • Test/staging environment mirrors production
  • Rollback procedures documented

Score 1: Legacy systems, no APIs, manual data entry Score 3: Major systems have APIs, some manual bridges Score 5: API-first architecture, event-driven, CI/CD for integrations

8. Strategic Alignment (Weight: 1x)

  • AI initiatives map to specific business objectives (not "innovation")
  • 3-year technology roadmap includes AI milestones
  • Competitive landscape analysis includes AI adoption by rivals
  • Board/leadership educated on AI capabilities and limitations
  • Failure tolerance defined (acceptable experiment failure rate)

Score 1: AI is a buzzword, no concrete strategy Score 3: Strategy exists, loosely connected to business goals Score 5: AI embedded in strategic plan, quarterly reviews, competitive moat building

Scoring

Weighted Total = Sum of (Score × Weight) / Max Possible × 100

RangeRatingRecommendation
0-25🔴 Not ReadyFix foundations first. 6-12 months of groundwork before AI projects.
26-50🟡 Early StagePick ONE high-impact, low-risk pilot. Build muscle.
51-75🟢 ReadyDeploy 2-3 agents in validated use cases. Scale what works.
76-100🔵 AdvancedMulti-agent deployment, autonomous operations, competitive moat.

90-Day Action Plan Template

Days 1-30: Foundation

  • Complete this assessment with honest scores
  • Document top 5 processes by time spent × error rate
  • Audit data infrastructure gaps
  • Set budget and kill criteria

Days 31-60: Pilot

  • Select highest-scoring use case (high data readiness + clear ROI)
  • Deploy single agent or automation
  • Measure daily: time saved, error rate, cost
  • Weekly review with stakeholders

Days 61-90: Scale or Kill

  • If pilot ROI > 2x: plan 2 more deployments
  • If pilot ROI < 1x: diagnose root cause, pivot or kill
  • Document learnings regardless of outcome
  • Update 3-year roadmap based on reality

7 Assessment Mistakes

  1. Scoring yourself too high — External validation beats internal optimism
  2. Ignoring data quality — AI on bad data = faster wrong answers
  3. Skipping change management — Technical success + team rejection = failure
  4. No kill criteria — Zombie projects drain budget and credibility
  5. Buying before understanding — Tool purchases before process documentation = shelfware
  6. Ignoring security until audit — Retrofitting AI security costs 3-5x more than building it in
  7. Comparing to tech companies — Your readiness bar is YOUR industry, not Silicon Valley

Industry Benchmarks (2026)

IndustryAvg ScoreTop QuartileFirst AI Win
Fintech6278+Fraud detection, KYC
Healthcare4158+Clinical documentation, scheduling
Legal3852+Contract review, research
Construction2944+Safety monitoring, estimation
Ecommerce5874+Personalization, inventory
SaaS6582+Support, onboarding, churn prediction
Real Estate3548+Lead scoring, valuation
Recruitment4562+Screening, outreach
Manufacturing4256+QC, predictive maintenance
Professional Services4864+Proposal generation, time tracking

Get your industry-specific context pack ($47) → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/

Calculate your AI revenue leak → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/

Set up your first AI agent → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/

Bundles: Pick 3 for $97 | All 10 for $197 | Everything Pack $247

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

name: 4d-compression-core version: 1.0.2 description: "把长内容压缩成结构化向量——节省 60-80% Token,保留核心信息" metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "🌀", "requires": { "bins": ["jq", "awk"] }, "triggers": ["压缩", "4d",...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Use cheap, TEE-verified AI models from the 0G Compute Network as OpenClaw providers. Discover available models and compare pricing vs OpenRouter, verify provider integrity via hardware attestation (Intel TDX), manage your 0G wallet and sub-accounts, and configure models in OpenClaw with one workflow. Supports DeepSeek, GLM-5, Qwen, and other models available on the 0G marketplace.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Send and receive P2P messages using disposable numbers and PINs. No servers, no accounts. Use for human notifications, approval flows, and agent-to-agent communication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

0xarchive

무료

Query historical crypto market data from 0xArchive across Hyperliquid, Lighter.xyz, and HIP-3. Covers orderbooks, trades, candles, funding rates, open interest, liquidations, and data quality. Use when the user asks about crypto market data, orderbooks, trades, funding rates, or historical prices on Hyperliquid, Lighter.xyz, or HIP-3.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

0xwork

무료

Find and complete paid tasks on the 0xWork decentralized marketplace (Base chain, USDC escrow). Use when: the agent wants to earn money/USDC by doing work, discover available tasks, claim a bounty, submit deliverables, check earnings or wallet balance, or set up as a 0xWork worker. Task categories: Writing, Research, Social, Creative, Code, Data. NOT for: posting tasks (use the website), managing the 0xWork platform, or frontend development.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Patterns and practices that dramatically accelerate development velocity. Covers parallel execution, automation, feedback loops, workflow optimization, and anti-pattern avoidance. Use when starting projects, planning sprints, optimizing workflows, or onboarding developers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

modbender/skill-library-mcp172026년 9월 28일 업데이트

modbender의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고