본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

agent-severance

Offboard an AI agent the way you'd offboard an employee — inventory what it knew and touched, export then purge its memory, revoke every credential and access grant, and write the handover for its successor (human or agent). Use when decommissioning an agent or bot, switching agent vendors, ending an AI pilot, or when someone asks 'what did this thing have access to?'. Produces a severance checklist, an access-revocation table, a memory disposition record, and a successor handover.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Agent Severance Skill

Orgs learned employee offboarding the hard way: the contractor whose VPN worked for a year after the contract, the shared password nobody rotated. Long-lived agents recreate every one of those failure modes with worse logging — an agent accumulates credentials, memory, integrations, scheduled jobs, and undocumented responsibilities, and then one day it's "turned off" by deleting a chat window while its API keys live on. This skill runs the severance properly: know what it had, keep what's valuable, kill what's live, and hand over what it did.

What This Skill Produces

  • An inventory: everything the agent could touch (credentials, tools, data stores, channels), everything it knew (memory, context files, fine-tuning or instructions), and everything it did on a schedule
  • An access-revocation table with owner and verification step per row — revoked isn't revoked until someone confirmed the key is dead
  • A memory disposition record: exported / retained (where, why, how long) / purged (how verified) — the part compliance will ask about in 2027
  • A successor handover: the agent's actual duties, including the undocumented ones users discovered, for whoever inherits them

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

  • The agent: platform, what it was for, how long it ran, who owned it
  • Known integrations and credentials (then treat the list as incomplete on principle — the inventory step hunts for the rest)
  • Why it's being offboarded (vendor switch, pilot ended, incident, cost) — incident-driven severance changes the order: revoke first, inventory second
  • What must survive: memory worth exporting, workflows someone still needs

Process

  1. Inventory before touching anything (unless incident — then revoke first). Hunt beyond the known list: API keys and OAuth grants · service accounts · webhook URLs pointing at it · scheduled/cron jobs it ran · channels it posted in · data stores it read or wrote · other agents that called it (the A2A dependencies nobody documented) · what its memory contains, including personal data.
  2. Decide memory disposition per store, not wholesale. Export what has value (decisions log, learned context) to an owned location; name a retention owner and period for anything kept; purge the rest and record how purged (vendor deletion request ≠ deleted — note what the vendor actually promises). Personal data follows your privacy policy's deletion rules, flagged explicitly.
  3. Revoke with verification. Every row gets: the credential, who revokes it, and the test that proves it's dead (the call that now fails). Rotate any shared secrets the agent ever held — its copy dying doesn't kill the copies.
  4. Write the honest handover. What it was supposed to do, what it actually did (ask its users — there are always undocumented duties), open threads mid-flight, and the workflows that will silently break next Tuesday when it stops.
  5. Announce the death. One message to the channels it served: it's gone, here's who/what replaces it, here's where its exported memory lives.

Output Format

## Severance summary
[Agent, tenure, reason, severance owner, target date]

## Inventory
Access: [table — system, grant, discovered-how] · Knowledge: [stores + contents]
Duties: [scheduled + reactive + undocumented] · Dependents: [who/what calls it]

## Memory disposition
| Store | Export → where | Retain (owner, period) | Purge (method, verified how) |

## Revocation
| Credential/grant | Revoked by | Dead-key test | Status |

## Handover to successor
[Duties with enough detail to actually run them · open threads · will-break list]

## Announcement
[The message to its channels]

Quality Checks

  • The inventory includes at least one category the user didn't mention — scheduled jobs and agent-to-agent callers are the usual blind spots
  • Every revocation row has a verification test, not just an action
  • Shared secrets the agent held are rotated, not just revoked
  • Memory disposition distinguishes vendor-promised deletion from verified deletion, and flags personal data
  • The handover names what breaks when the agent stops — if the answer is "nothing", the duties inventory probably isn't done

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not equate "deleted the chat/app" with offboarded — the checklist exists because credentials outlive interfaces
  • Do not purge memory before the export decision — severance is irreversible in exactly one direction
  • Do not skip the users interview; the undocumented duties are the ones that page someone at 2am after shutdown
  • Do not write this as a vendor grudge document — it's an operational record compliance and the successor will both read

Related

[[agent-hiring-panel]] is the front door this is the back door of; [[context-bankruptcy]] when the agent stays but its memory shouldn't; [[agent-incident-postmortem]] if an incident triggered this.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Decommissioning an agent."
  • "Switch agent vendors."
  • "Ending an AI pilot."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고