본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ai-context-primer

Build the context an AI needs to do a task well — the background, constraints, examples, and format it can't guess — so you get a great result on the first try instead of a generic one you have to keep correcting. Use when asked why does AI give me generic answers, how do I give AI better context, my AI results are mediocre, or how do I get it right the first time. Produces the specific context this task needs (who/what/constraints/examples/format), a reusable primer you can paste ahead of the request, the difference between a starved prompt and a well-briefed one, and what to leave out — turning vague back-and-forth into a strong first result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AI-Context Primer

Generic AI answers are almost always a context problem, not a model problem — you asked for something the AI had no way to tailor, so it gave you the average of everything. The fix is priming: giving it the background, constraints, examples, and format it can't guess before you make the request. This builds that primer for your task, so the first result is close, not a starting point you spend five rounds correcting.

What This Skill Produces

  • The context this task actually needs — the who (audience, you), the what (goal, background), the constraints (must/must-not), the examples (what good looks like), and the format (structure, length, tone)
  • A reusable primer block — a clean paste-ahead of your request that briefs the AI properly, not a one-off
  • The gap it fills — what the AI was missing that made earlier answers generic, made explicit
  • What to leave out — the noise that dilutes rather than helps, so the primer stays sharp
  • Starved vs briefed, shown — a quick before/after so you feel the difference context makes
  • A primer habit — how to make briefing-before-asking your default for tasks that matter

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The task — what you want the AI to do
  • The background it can't guess — your situation, audience, goal, prior context
  • What good looks like — an example, a reference, or the standard you're holding it to
  • Constraints — must-haves, must-avoids, length, tone, format
  • What went generic before — if you've tried, what was off (points at the missing context)

Framework: Brief It Like It Knows Nothing About You

  1. Name what the AI can't know. It has no access to your situation, audience, standards, or prior work — list what it'd need to tailor the answer, because that's exactly what's missing.
  2. Assemble the five pieces. Who (audience + you), what (goal + background), constraints (must/must-not), examples (what good looks like), format (structure/length/tone) — the reliable spine of good context.
  3. Show, don't just tell. An example of the output you want, or a reference you like, teaches the AI more than a paragraph of description — include one where the task is fuzzy.
  4. Cut the noise. More context isn't better — irrelevant detail dilutes the signal. Keep what changes the output, drop what doesn't.
  5. Make it reusable. Package it as a primer block you can paste ahead of similar requests, not something you rebuild each time.

Output Format

Context primer: [the task]

Who: [audience + relevant about you]. What: [goal + the background it can't guess]. Constraints: [must-haves · must-avoids · length/tone]. Example of good: [a sample or reference — where the task is fuzzy]. Format: [structure / length / tone you want].

Paste-ahead primer:

[the assembled block, ready to put before your request]

Why earlier answers were generic: [the missing piece this fills]. Leave out: [the noise that would dilute it].

Quality Checks

  • Identifies what the AI genuinely can't know for this task
  • Assembles who / what / constraints / example / format
  • Includes an example of "good" where the task is fuzzy
  • Cuts irrelevant detail that dilutes the signal
  • Packages a reusable primer, not a one-off

Anti-Patterns

  • Blaming the model for what's really missing context.
  • A wall of irrelevant background that dilutes the ask.
  • Telling without showing — no example of what good looks like.
  • Rebuilding context from scratch every time.
  • Omitting the format and being surprised by the shape.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Why does AI keep giving me generic, mediocre answers?"
  • "How do I give AI enough context to get it right the first time?"
  • "My AI results are bland — what am I not telling it?"
  • "Help me brief the AI properly for this task."
  • "Build me a context block I can paste before my requests."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고