본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ai-tool-picker

Figure out which AI tool actually fits the task in front of you — chatbot, coding assistant, image model, agent, or none — instead of forcing one tool onto everything. Use when asked which AI tool should I use for, what's the best AI for, do I even need AI for this, or should I use ChatGPT or something else. Produces a match between your task and the right kind of AI tool (with why), the trade-offs that matter for your case, when the answer is a non-AI tool or plain human effort, and how to try it cheaply before committing — so you pick by fit, not by hype or habit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

AI-Tool Picker

Most people reach for the one AI tool they know and force every task through it — or freeze because there are a hundred options and endless hype. The right question isn't "what's the best AI tool," it's "what kind of tool fits this task." This matches your task to the right category of AI (or none), names the trade-offs that actually matter for your case, and shows how to try it cheaply — so you choose by fit, not by marketing.

What This Skill Produces

  • The task-to-tool match — which category of tool fits (conversational assistant, coding assistant, image/video model, research agent, automation, specialized app) and why
  • The trade-offs that matter for you — the 2–3 dimensions that actually decide it for this task (accuracy, privacy, cost, speed, integration), not a generic feature grid
  • The "you don't need AI for this" call — when a non-AI tool or plain human effort is genuinely the better answer
  • A cheap way to try it — how to test the fit with a free tier or a small task before committing time or money
  • A shortlist, not a lecture — a couple of concrete options in the right category, chosen for your constraints

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The task — what you're actually trying to get done
  • Your constraints — budget, privacy needs, where it has to fit (a workflow, a tool you already use)
  • Your current tools — what you already have access to (often the answer's already in your pocket)
  • The stakes — one-off vs recurring, low-stakes vs must-be-right

Framework: Fit The Task, Not The Hype

  1. Name the task shape. Is it generation, transformation, research, decision support, or automation? The shape points to the tool category far better than brand names do.
  2. Pick the category first. Match the shape to a kind of tool (assistant, coding, image, agent, specialized) before naming any product — categories are stable, products churn.
  3. Find the 2–3 deciding trade-offs. For this specific task, what actually decides it — accuracy, privacy, cost, speed, integration? Ignore the dimensions that don't matter here.
  4. Check if AI is even the answer. Some tasks are better done by a non-AI tool, a template, or ten minutes of human effort — say so when it's true.
  5. Recommend a cheap test. Suggest trying the fit on a small real task via a free tier before investing — fit is revealed by use, not spec sheets.

Output Format

Tool for: [the task]

Task shape: [generation / transformation / research / decision support / automation]. Right category: [conversational assistant / coding / image / research agent / automation / specialized] — because [reason]. Deciding trade-offs for you: [the 2–3 that actually matter here]. Shortlist: [a couple concrete options in that category, fit to your constraints]. Or skip AI: [when a non-AI tool / human effort is the better call — if applicable]. Try it cheaply: [free tier / small test task before committing].

Quality Checks

  • Identifies the task shape before naming tools
  • Recommends a category, not just a trendy product name
  • Names only the trade-offs that matter for this task
  • Flags when AI isn't the right answer at all
  • Suggests a cheap way to test fit before committing

Anti-Patterns

  • Defaulting to the one tool the person already knows for everything.
  • A generic feature comparison ignoring what matters for this task.
  • Recommending AI where a non-AI tool or human effort wins.
  • Chasing the hyped product over the right category.
  • No cheap test — committing before verifying fit.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Which AI tool should I use for editing my photos?"
  • "What's the best AI for summarizing research papers?"
  • "Do I even need AI for this, or is there a simpler tool?"
  • "Should I use ChatGPT for this or something more specialized?"
  • "There are too many AI tools — which one fits what I'm doing?"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고