본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

body-double-session

Set up and run a body-doubling session — using another person's presence (in the room, on a call, or a chat check-in) to start and stay on the task your ADHD brain keeps bouncing off. Use when someone says 'I can't start this task', 'body double with me', 'I only work when someone's around', or has ADHD/executive-dysfunction and a task that won't begin. Produces a session plan, the exact ask to send a body-double partner, and a solo fallback for when no one's available.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Body Double Session Skill

Body doubling — working alongside another person's presence — is one of the few ADHD strategies that reliably converts "I physically cannot start this" into "it's half done." It isn't accountability or supervision; the other person does nothing but exist nearby, and somehow the task that was impossible alone becomes possible. This skill sets one up properly: pick the right task, structure the session so the doubling actually helps (there's a way to do it wrong), write the slightly-awkward ask to a partner, and — because the partner isn't always available — build the solo approximations that borrow the same mechanism.

What This Skill Produces

  • A session plan: the task cut to a startable first step, session length, the start ritual, and how breaks work so momentum survives them
  • The partner ask, ready to send: what body doubling is, what you need them to do (almost nothing), format (in person / video / audio / async check-in), and duration — de-awkwarded
  • A format pick: which kind of doubling fits this task and this person (silent video coworking vs a start-and-check-in text vs someone physically there)
  • A solo fallback: the ways to fake the presence when no one's free (a coworking stream, a "just started, will report back" text, a scheduled call at the finish line)

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

  • The task that won't start, and honestly why it's sticky (boring? ambiguous? scary? too big? all four?)
  • Who might body double (a friend, partner, an online coworking room, a coworker) and how comfortable the user is asking
  • What's worked before, if anything, and what killed past attempts (a chatty double who became a distraction is common)
  • Time available and the environment they'll do it in

Framework

  1. Cut the task to a startable atom. Body doubling starts things; it can't start a blob. Reduce the task to a first action small enough that beginning it is almost involuntary ("open the document and title it," not "write the report"). The double is the ignition; the atom is the fuel line.
  2. Pick the format by task and person. Deep silent work → silent video/in-person coworking. A dread task → someone who'll start with you then just be there. A day of scattered admin → async check-ins ("starting now" / "done, next"). The wrong format (a talker for deep work) turns a double into a distraction — match deliberately.
  3. Write the ask so it's easy to say yes to. The partner's job is tiny and the ask should say so: "I focus way better when someone's just there — can we hop on a muted video call for 45 min while we each do our own thing? You don't have to do anything." Low cost to them, easy yes. Reciprocity ("I'll double you back") makes it sustainable.
  4. Ritualize start and protect breaks. A tiny start ritual (cameras on, "starting in 3… go") flips the switch; a rule for breaks (they end, doubling resumes) keeps a pause from becoming the end. Name the finish so there's a landing.
  5. Fake the presence when you must. No partner? Approximations that borrow the mechanism: a live coworking stream/room, texting a friend "starting X, tell you when it's done," booking a call for right after the task (a soft deadline with a face attached), or working in a café. Weaker than the real thing, better than alone.

Output Format

## The session
Task, cut to its startable atom: …
Format (and why it fits): … · Length: … · Start ritual: … · Break rule: …

## The ask (send this)
[The low-cost, easy-yes message to your body double + a reciprocity line]

## If no one's available (solo fallbacks)
[Coworking room · start/finish check-in text · call-at-the-finish-line · café]

## The landing
[What "done for this session" is, so momentum has an endpoint]

Quality Checks

  • The task is cut to an atom small enough that starting is nearly involuntary
  • The format is matched to the task type, not defaulted — talkers aren't assigned to deep work
  • The partner ask is genuinely low-cost and easy to decline-or-accept, with reciprocity offered
  • A solo fallback exists — the skill still works when no human is available
  • There's a defined finish, so a session has a landing instead of trailing off

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not turn the double into a supervisor or accountability enforcer — presence is the mechanism, judgment kills it
  • Do not assign a chatty format to focus work; social doubling and deep-work doubling are different tools
  • Do not shame the user for needing this — body doubling is a legitimate, well-attested strategy, not a crutch to apologize for
  • Do not skip the atom step and double a vague blob — it'll fail and feel like the user's fault when it was the setup's
  • Do not treat inability-to-start as laziness anywhere in tone; executive dysfunction is real and the whole point

Related

[[deep-work-blocking]] for the solo-structure layer; [[task-triage-matrix]] to pick which atom first; [[masking-budget]] and [[meltdown-map]] for the ND context around it.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "I can't start this task."
  • "Body double with me."
  • "I only work when someone's around."
  • "Sit with me while I do my taxes."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고