본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

budget-tracker-design

Design a budget-vs-actuals tracker that stays alive past February — the category grain that matches real statements, the variance view that answers 'are we okay', the update ritual small enough to survive, and the honest handling of irregular expenses. Use when asked build me a budget spreadsheet, track team spend against budget, why do we always blow the budget invisibly, or design a household/project budget tracker. Produces the tracker structure, the variance logic, the irregulars ledger, and the monthly fifteen-minute ritual.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Budget Tracker Design Skill

Budget trackers die two deaths: too granular (forty categories nobody can code a coffee receipt into — abandoned by February) or too vague (three buckets that hide every overrun until it's structural). The living tracker matches its grain to how spending actually arrives (statement lines, invoices), answers one question at a glance — "are we okay, and where not?" — handles irregular expenses honestly (the annual insurance bill is not a "shock"), and costs fifteen minutes a month, because the ritual's survivability is the design's real constraint.

What This Skill Produces

  • The structure — categories at statement-grain (8–15, not 40), the month × category grid, budget column with its source
  • The variance view — actual vs. budget with the month-and-YTD dual read, conditional signals at honest thresholds
  • The irregulars ledger — annual/lumpy expenses spread as monthly accruals so they stop being surprises
  • The ritual — the fifteen-minute monthly update, sourced from statements, calendared

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The scope — household, team, or project budget; and the currency of pain ("we get surprised" vs "we can't approve spend" vs "the money just goes")
  • The spend sources — cards, invoices, payroll, reimbursements; categories must match how these report, or every update becomes archaeology
  • The budget numbers — from where (last year +X%? A plan? First-time guesses marked as guesses to be re-based at month 3)?
  • The irregulars — the annual/quarterly lumps (insurance, subscriptions (subscription-audit finds them), taxes, conferences) — listed, because the design accrues them

Framework: The Design Rules

  1. Grain follows the statement: categories are what spending arrives labeled as — if the card statement says "Software," a tracker with nine software sub-categories requires a coder, and the coder quits. 8–15 categories; anything needing more is two budgets.
  2. The dual read is the view: this-month variance (the early warning) AND year-to-date variance (the truth) — monthly noise means YTD is where "are we okay" actually lives, and trackers showing only months train panic-then-complacency cycles.
  3. Accrue the irregulars: every lumpy expense becomes a monthly twelfth in its category (the insurance is $60/month that bills annually) — the single design move that ends the "shock" pattern, because the shocks were scheduled all along. The irregulars ledger lists each lump, its month, and its accrual.
  4. Thresholds mean something: the variance signal fires at a level worth attention (±10% or a real amount, scaled to the category) — a tracker that flags $3 overruns in red teaches signal-blindness by March.
  5. The ritual is the moat: monthly, 15 minutes, from statements: fill actuals (statement-grain makes this transcription, not judgment), scan the dual read, write ONE sentence ("okay except software, +22% YTD — the new tool stack"). The sentence is the tracker's product; a tracker updated but unread is a diary, and one demanding an hour is abandoned.

Output Format

Budget Tracker: [scope] — [year]

Structure

[Categories (statement-grained) × months · budget column + source note · the guesses marked for month-3 rebase]

Variance View

[Month + YTD columns · signal thresholds per category · the one-glance "are we okay" row]

Irregulars Ledger

LumpBills inAnnualMonthly accrual

The Ritual (15 min, calendared)

[Fill from statements → scan dual read → the one sentence → done]

Quality Checks

  • Categories map 1:1-ish to how spend arrives — no receipt requires judgment to code
  • Both month and YTD variance are visible; YTD carries the verdict
  • Every known lump is accrued monthly in the ledger
  • Thresholds are set at attention-worthy levels per category
  • The ritual fits in 15 minutes and ends in one written sentence

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not build 40 categories — granularity that outruns the statements kills the tracker
  • Do not read only the current month — noise up, noise down, lesson: read YTD
  • Do not let annual bills be "surprises" — they have dates; accrue them
  • Do not alert on trivial variance — red must mean something or it means nothing
  • Do not skip the sentence — an updated tracker nobody reads is maintenance cosplay

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Build me a budget spreadsheet."
  • "Track team spend against budget."
  • "Why do we always blow the budget invisibly?"
  • "Design a household/project budget tracker."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고