본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

childcare-comparison

Compare childcare options — nursery/daycare, childminder, nanny, family, or a mix — for your family's real needs, budget, and values. Use when asked to compare childcare options, nursery vs nanny, how to choose childcare, or find the right childcare. Produces a needs-and-values profile, a side-by-side of the realistic options on cost/flexibility/socialization/control, the questions to ask and red flags to check on visits, a total-cost read (including subsidies), and a decision that fits your priorities — not a generic ranking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Childcare Comparison

Childcare is one of the biggest, most emotional decisions a family makes, and the "best" option is entirely personal — it depends on your hours, budget, values, and child. This builds a clear comparison of the realistic options against your priorities, arms you with the right questions and red flags for visits, and lands on a recommendation that fits your family rather than a one-size ranking.

What This Skill Produces

  • A needs-and-values profile — hours, budget, what matters most (socialization, flexibility, one-on-one, cost, values)
  • A side-by-side comparison — nursery/daycare vs. childminder vs. nanny vs. family/mix on cost, flexibility, socialization, sickness backup, control, and continuity
  • Visit questions & red flags — what to ask and observe (ratios, staff turnover, safety, warmth, licensing)
  • A true-cost read — full cost including any subsidies, tax help, and hidden extras
  • A fitting recommendation — the option (or combination) that best matches the family's priorities and constraints

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The need — child's age, hours/days required, start date
  • Budget — what's realistic, and awareness of any subsidies/support
  • Priorities — socialization, flexibility, one-on-one care, cost, specific values
  • Constraints — location, work schedules, backup for sick days, family nearby
  • Options considered — what's available/appealing locally

Framework: Match Options To Your Priorities

  1. Define priorities first. There's no universal best — clarify what this family most needs (cost, flexibility, socialization, control) before comparing.
  2. Compare on what matters to them. Line up the realistic options against those priorities plus the practical must-haves (sick-day backup, hours, continuity).
  3. Cost it honestly. Compare total cost including subsidies/tax support and extras (meals, deposits, agency fees, holiday pay for a nanny).
  4. Equip the visit. Give the questions to ask and red flags to watch (ratios, turnover, licensing, safety, and the hard-to-fake warmth of the place).
  5. Recommend for the family. Land on the best fit — often a combination — tied explicitly to their stated priorities, not a generic verdict.

Output Format

Childcare: child age [x] · [hours needed] · budget [y] · priorities [z]

Options side-by-side

OptionCost (total)FlexibilitySocializationSick backupControl
Nursery/daycare
Childminder
Nanny
Family/mix

On visits — ask/observe: [ratios · turnover · licensing · safety · warmth · daily routine]. True cost: include [subsidies/tax help + hidden extras]. Best fit for you: [option/combo] — because [ties to their priorities].

Quality Checks

  • Starts from the family's priorities, not a generic ranking
  • Compares realistic options on the dimensions that matter to them
  • Includes total cost with subsidies and hidden extras
  • Provides visit questions and red flags
  • Recommends a fit (often a combination) tied to their priorities
  • Accounts for practical needs (sick backup, hours, continuity)

Anti-Patterns

  • Declaring one option "best" regardless of the family.
  • Comparing headline price without subsidies/extras.
  • No visit guidance — missing the red flags that matter.
  • Ignoring practical realities like sick-day backup.
  • Overlooking a mix that might fit better than any single option.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Nursery or a nanny — which is right for us?"
  • "Help me compare childcare options for our 1-year-old."
  • "What should I ask when visiting a daycare?"
  • "How do I choose childcare on a tight budget?"
  • "We need part-time care with backup for sick days — what fits?"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고